Even after the humiliating beatdown for covering up Biden's cognitive decline, the Times is still working overtime to protect the Democrats and go to war on Trump.
“The New York Times not only missed the story of Biden’s cognitive decline”…
They didn’t MISS anything. They worked deliberately to cover for him and his administration, and shamelessly disparage and mock anyone and everyone who even attempted to point it out.
As for the Russia plot, one outlet yesterday claimed that all the newly released documents were created by Russia! I mean, good God help us!
Just wait til they find out Epstein was inextricably linked to the Clinton Foundation! Always follow the money.
It’s all blowing up in their faces, the Dems, the media, all their globalist cronies.
Sad part is, I’ll betcha no one goes to jail for any of it.
Sasha, 5:30pm PST Friday and Bari Weiss & The Free Press still have not covered this story, either. TFP used to be my go to each AM to ‘get both sides’. But not any longer. I think when the ‘Toadie’ (what Bari called Tulsi Gabbard) is behind the drip, drip, drip of the Russiagate story, and Nellie’s lifelong love affair with Hillary - prevents TFP from doing any real journalism on this important subject.
I dropped my subscription to TFP— it’s become the NYT
And as soon as the NYT subscription runs out, it’s going away
Like Sasha I keep hoping for better but it’s just not happening
I don’t know how this ends
And she’s right they don’t know how to talk to people. They have absolutely no interest in serving the truth. They only serve the people in their bubble who they know are their loyal subscribers, and I’m done.
“Many of the senior officials in Trump’s own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations. I would know. I am one of them.”
- Bari Weiss 3:49 pm 05 Sep. 18
I should cancel my fp subscription as well but am still seeing signs of the Turn.
Weiss is seriously corrupted by her politics. She has been the whole time she has been a journalist. She has spent several years sneering and deriding the disillusioned faction of the Democrat party and utterly hates conservatism. People are just fooled by her because she couldn't stand by and watch WaPo turn into a an LGBTQ intersectional kindergarten. But that doesn't make her an honorable journalist, only one with a veneer of principles. Her position on the Gabbard Harris dust-up and subsequent dismissal of Gabbard as a person was a perfect example of my point.
Yes, it’s that veneer that bugs me. And why I won’t re up my subscription when it runs out. If Bari sells to Skydance (CBS parent company) I’ll not give them another click. That seems to be in the works now:
Seriously? I didn't know that, but I also don't read NYT and am woefully uninformed in the Sky dance buyout beyond that it all makes Trump look the egotist that he is. Fortunately, his massive ego seems to be matched by an actual interest in the country thriving which is a hell of a kit better than any President I can remember. Even Reagan was puppetre by his intelligence services.
So true. I yearn for a media outlet that will have both sides on a podcast and I thought Bari would be that but still only read and watch her free stuff. Now glad I never did a paid sub.
The New York Times credibility has descended from merely being partisan to full blown yellow journalism. For example:
The NYT frequently used phrases like “people familiar with the matter” in its Russiagate stories, appearing over 1,000 times between 2016 and 2021. Critics, including former NYT reporter Jeff Gerth, argued this vagueness obscured potential biases in sourcing, a hallmark of yellow journalism’s lack of transparency.
NYT’s Russiagate coverage aligns with yellow journalism in several ways:
Sensational Headlines: Articles like “Trump Campaign Aides Had Repeated Contacts With Russian Intelligence” used dramatic language to imply wrongdoing, even when evidence was thin.
Exaggerated Narratives: The paper’s portrayal of the Steele dossier and unverified claims as credible fueled a narrative of conspiracy, similar to Hearst’s exaggerated Spanish-American War stories.
Bias and Agenda: The NYT’s focus on anti-Trump narratives, as admitted by Baquet, mirrors the partisan slant of 19th-century yellow journalism, where papers pushed political agendas (e.g., Hearst’s anti-Spanish stance).
Lack of Accountability: The refusal to fully retract or reflect on discredited stories parallels historical yellow journalism’s tendency to prioritize circulation over truth.
Eventually, even those that live in the "bubble" will recognize the yellow journalism for what it is - Sensational lying that tries to destroy political opponents!
Unfortunately, that includes the Wall Street Journal. The editorial side has a political mix but the news side is just another example of a MSM echo chamber. I cancelled my subscription and would rather support sources like Sasha Stone.
Having sensational titles goes as far back as the first newspaper. On the Internet, it's called "click bait". The purpose of the sensationalized title is to get us to read articles.
There was a newspaper that decided to print only feel good articles. After a month, it lost so many subscribers that they thought they would have to close. They decided to go back using sensationalized heading and articles. Their newspaper began to flourish again.
They CAN’T cover the truth because they were complicit in the conspiracy all along and conspired with the democrats and the deep state. They agreed to do their part in the hoax. They have to double down and deny right now because ANYthing else will implicate them and expose that they are criminals too.
For our MSM to ever be trusted again they would have to admit the truth and come clean. They would have to show remorse and shame. Without that we will NEVER trust them again.
The Holodomor was a deliberate famine-genocide in Ukraine, killing millions under Stalin’s policies. The NYT’s coverage, led by Walter Duranty, downplayed the crisis, echoing yellow journalism’s bias and manipulation, much like critiques of its Russiagate reporting for exaggerating unverified claims. Both cases highlight how media can shape narratives at the expense of truth, eroding trust.
My leftie friends are all losing their minds on Trump hate. Non-stop, no slight too small, no story too crazy, no spin too spun. The NY Times sells subscriptions to these people and will feed them. That is basically it. They don't care about accuracy, they don't care about balance. That has all left the building.
I could enjoy watching lefties completely lose their minds over Trump even just being a feature in the zeitgeist let alone a President who they hate. But unfortunately, most of my family and friends are lefties who have little time for rational discussions about important matters. It's ad hominem, appeal to authority, blind adoration, false assumption, and pea brain explanations of the world.
It would be lovely to magic into existence a purely liberal state for them all to live in and then watch them leave it like rats fleeing a sinking ship under stupid pretenses rather than the obvious truth - progressivism and dogmatic atheism together make a giant bag of shit that nobody really wants.
They, along with the mainstream media outlets, ran that Palestina mother photo with her supposed starving baby when in fact he was suffering from a few health issues like cerebral palsy if I recall.
But that didn't stop the NYTIMEs from running the photo and the narrative.
Oh yeah they retracted the lie but the damage was done. They do this ALL the time.
That story from the NYT is so outrageous! That they would use the unfortunate circumstances of that mother and her son's medical condition as fodder for their inflammatory agenda of "starvation and genocide" is truly preditory and perverted. The cropping out of the healthy son only reinforces the deception. Unwittingly, what they managed to accomplish is the complete undermining of the "starvation" talking point. Supposedly "20,000" starving childern and the story they ran had absolutely nothing to do with "starvation". And their completely lame "correction" was as vile as the manipulated story itself. Only fools would continue to read a paper that still proves itself to be propagandized trash.
Turley's piece seems to say that even more evidence will be coming out that that foreign sources knew of the plan, above and beyond the classified annex which came out this week. He writes:
"Reports indicate that the CIA is about to declassify material showing that foreign sources were also in on the trick. The information reportedly indicates that foreign sources were aware of the move to create a Russian collusion scandal and expected that the FBI would play a role in the plan. "
Yes they have a lot more they will be releasing. The left behaves as if they showed everything they have - they haven’t. And I love the left’s typical premature reactions and accusations that will leave them all with egg on their faces. They have been doing that all year. They just want their beliefs about Trump to be true so badly they can’t help themselves.
When Nixon was taken down, the ‘tapes’ was the straw that broke the camels back, and those were only released after many months of negative press lead up. Could we bring seeing a similar story? If so we are still in the early chapters. And many from the Left will be lawyering up.
The problem the people of NYT have is the same problem genocidal maniacs, third-world dictators, islamists, and communists have. They suffer from ignorance of self and objectify all people to turn them into things. If people are things then they don't really matter. Such dehumanizing conversions are fundamental lies about our identities before the Creator.
The times won a pulitzer for their being completely wrong about the Russian potemkin village scam that the times brought hook line and sinker about the communist utopia almost a century ago.
Sasha, I love your reporting - but it's way past time to drop your subscription to the NYT. I dropped my 25+ year subscription at least 10 years ago when it became obvious the gray lady was nothing more than a consciously biased and disingenuous mouthpiece for the Democrat left and their narratives in its reporting. This bias became fully manifest when Bari Weiss left her formerly esteemed position with the Times due to disillusionment over the deterioration of the paper's reporting.
I stopped believing MSM a long time ago. Anything I read or see in a paper or on TV news I take with a grain of salt. It's been reasonably easy to find sources that will tell the other or both sides of the story, you being one of them.
They'll beat the Epstein story to death to keep our eyes off Hillary and Barry, the DOJ, the FBI, and the corrupt intelligence services. If they had anything on Trump in the Epstein files, wouldn't it seem they'd use it? They threw everything including the kitchen sink, they wouldn't have withheld sex crimes if they had them.
You should always treat any news source today with the same standard. Almost all media today has an ulterior motive and most likely its a political party agenda.
I freely admit to subscribing to the Times for the last year. I find personal value in the overtly jaundiced reporting and I refuse to stay ignorant in an echo chamber. I feel obligated to know and witness how these “elite” reporters and editorialists choose to manipulate their base.
Yesterday they printed an article about a taco shop in California. Do New Yorkers, or Memphians like me for that matter, intend to travel LA to try a recommended taco? Please. It was an immigration editorial wrapped in a fake restaurant review. I was jogging down the street and laughing out loud. But then, there is one more reason for my five bucks a month…
Haha! We have a subscription to the Chicago Tribune for much the same reason. It has turned into a liberal rag, mirroring much of the NYT articles. They fired all their conservative columnists over the past few years. We maintain the subscription purely for the sports section. And I guess also to see what stories the Communist agenda is pushing. I assume this is why Sasha needs to keep her subscription. You can’t really criticize the paper on hearsay.
The list of NYT dishonesty, misdirection and political bias is long. Just this week, the NYT used a cropped photo of a Gazan child with debilitating muscular dystrophy and claimed he was suffering from malnutrition to reinforce their false narrative about Palestinian "starvation."
To bolster their report, the NYT relies on a terrorist death cult, Hamas, and a collection of corrupt NGOs as their sole information sources. They tap into an avid readership of delusional true believers to pay the bills.
In news story after news story, the NYT’s arrogant disregard for the truth is obvious. Now a garbage publication, the NYT is dishonest and untrustworthy. It has become a bad leftist joke.
The times has never been respectable, check out their Moscow Chief in the 1930s, one Walter Durante, an apologist for Stalins famines. He got a Pulitzer then, nothing has changed at. The Slimes.
What Sedition and if it was why didn't Biden pardon him? Being a traitor does not make you immune from the law Nixon taught us that. MAGA have the critical thinking skills of a minion because if they actually did they would see Trump just hyping constantly. This drip feed constantly feeding of anger has numbed the minds.
What are you talking about "hyping constantly"? Obama has some immunity and Biden knew that and Biden also knewTrump's DOJ probably won't go after him (after talking so much about how a president was NEVER INDICTED in the history of our country), even though he's the most corrupt pres we've ever had.....well, maybe Wilson is worse.
Not an ounce of creativity. Take someone else's comment, change a few words, and call it your own....Liberal Plagiarism. That's what got Joe Biden where is is today....a washed-up has-been thief. You're pathetic.
Look at Mamdani - he is a communist and he's running as a Democrat-aligned candidate. Dems are a gazillion times more like communists than Reps are Nazis. In fact, Reps are, in no way, aligned or 'like' Nazis.
I haven't listened to anything Trump has said in a week or two. What I just commented is what I SAID and what I BELIEVE and I BELIEVE what I BELIEVE by way of listening to Mamdani and Republican politicians.
I think many woman are attractive and most of the time its their behavior not their looks. Skin deep aspect is why both males and females have become so shallow and ugly character wise no wonder why we have such a low marriage rate.
“The New York Times not only missed the story of Biden’s cognitive decline”…
They didn’t MISS anything. They worked deliberately to cover for him and his administration, and shamelessly disparage and mock anyone and everyone who even attempted to point it out.
As for the Russia plot, one outlet yesterday claimed that all the newly released documents were created by Russia! I mean, good God help us!
Just wait til they find out Epstein was inextricably linked to the Clinton Foundation! Always follow the money.
It’s all blowing up in their faces, the Dems, the media, all their globalist cronies.
Sad part is, I’ll betcha no one goes to jail for any of it.
Sasha, 5:30pm PST Friday and Bari Weiss & The Free Press still have not covered this story, either. TFP used to be my go to each AM to ‘get both sides’. But not any longer. I think when the ‘Toadie’ (what Bari called Tulsi Gabbard) is behind the drip, drip, drip of the Russiagate story, and Nellie’s lifelong love affair with Hillary - prevents TFP from doing any real journalism on this important subject.
So true
I dropped my subscription to TFP— it’s become the NYT
And as soon as the NYT subscription runs out, it’s going away
Like Sasha I keep hoping for better but it’s just not happening
I don’t know how this ends
And she’s right they don’t know how to talk to people. They have absolutely no interest in serving the truth. They only serve the people in their bubble who they know are their loyal subscribers, and I’m done.
A tweet from Bari:
Bari Weiss
“Many of the senior officials in Trump’s own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations. I would know. I am one of them.”
- Bari Weiss 3:49 pm 05 Sep. 18
I should cancel my fp subscription as well but am still seeing signs of the Turn.
Weiss is seriously corrupted by her politics. She has been the whole time she has been a journalist. She has spent several years sneering and deriding the disillusioned faction of the Democrat party and utterly hates conservatism. People are just fooled by her because she couldn't stand by and watch WaPo turn into a an LGBTQ intersectional kindergarten. But that doesn't make her an honorable journalist, only one with a veneer of principles. Her position on the Gabbard Harris dust-up and subsequent dismissal of Gabbard as a person was a perfect example of my point.
Yes, it’s that veneer that bugs me. And why I won’t re up my subscription when it runs out. If Bari sells to Skydance (CBS parent company) I’ll not give them another click. That seems to be in the works now:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/11/business/free-press-skydance-acquisition-talks.html
Seriously? I didn't know that, but I also don't read NYT and am woefully uninformed in the Sky dance buyout beyond that it all makes Trump look the egotist that he is. Fortunately, his massive ego seems to be matched by an actual interest in the country thriving which is a hell of a kit better than any President I can remember. Even Reagan was puppetre by his intelligence services.
To be honest, I like Trump's ego. It's well deserved because he rarely gets credit for the things he has done for Americans.
Yes, Trump has a massive ego. So did America in its previous glory days. Let’s run it back.
LOL. I enjoyed that
Oops, NYT not WaPo. Typing too quickly
So true. I yearn for a media outlet that will have both sides on a podcast and I thought Bari would be that but still only read and watch her free stuff. Now glad I never did a paid sub.
Correct !
The New York Times credibility has descended from merely being partisan to full blown yellow journalism. For example:
The NYT frequently used phrases like “people familiar with the matter” in its Russiagate stories, appearing over 1,000 times between 2016 and 2021. Critics, including former NYT reporter Jeff Gerth, argued this vagueness obscured potential biases in sourcing, a hallmark of yellow journalism’s lack of transparency.
NYT’s Russiagate coverage aligns with yellow journalism in several ways:
Sensational Headlines: Articles like “Trump Campaign Aides Had Repeated Contacts With Russian Intelligence” used dramatic language to imply wrongdoing, even when evidence was thin.
Exaggerated Narratives: The paper’s portrayal of the Steele dossier and unverified claims as credible fueled a narrative of conspiracy, similar to Hearst’s exaggerated Spanish-American War stories.
Bias and Agenda: The NYT’s focus on anti-Trump narratives, as admitted by Baquet, mirrors the partisan slant of 19th-century yellow journalism, where papers pushed political agendas (e.g., Hearst’s anti-Spanish stance).
Lack of Accountability: The refusal to fully retract or reflect on discredited stories parallels historical yellow journalism’s tendency to prioritize circulation over truth.
Eventually, even those that live in the "bubble" will recognize the yellow journalism for what it is - Sensational lying that tries to destroy political opponents!
And you could say that designation applies to pretty much the entirety of the legacy media, as well.
Unfortunately, that includes the Wall Street Journal. The editorial side has a political mix but the news side is just another example of a MSM echo chamber. I cancelled my subscription and would rather support sources like Sasha Stone.
Having sensational titles goes as far back as the first newspaper. On the Internet, it's called "click bait". The purpose of the sensationalized title is to get us to read articles.
There was a newspaper that decided to print only feel good articles. After a month, it lost so many subscribers that they thought they would have to close. They decided to go back using sensationalized heading and articles. Their newspaper began to flourish again.
RUSKI! RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA!😹👺
Exactly - A feature not a bug.
The Times won a Pulitzer for gaslighting the US over Holomodor. Says it all.
They CAN’T cover the truth because they were complicit in the conspiracy all along and conspired with the democrats and the deep state. They agreed to do their part in the hoax. They have to double down and deny right now because ANYthing else will implicate them and expose that they are criminals too.
For our MSM to ever be trusted again they would have to admit the truth and come clean. They would have to show remorse and shame. Without that we will NEVER trust them again.
At least the Corporation for Public Broadcasting announced its shut down today. Doors close Sep 30 ‘25.
https://www.npr.org/2025/08/01/nx-s1-5489808/cpb-shut-down-public-broadcasting-trump
So good. They were wayyyyy too biased to one side to expect the taxpayer to fund them. Their refusal to represent us all was their undoing.
Yippee!
I had to look Holomodor up (Good example)-
The Holodomor was a deliberate famine-genocide in Ukraine, killing millions under Stalin’s policies. The NYT’s coverage, led by Walter Duranty, downplayed the crisis, echoing yellow journalism’s bias and manipulation, much like critiques of its Russiagate reporting for exaggerating unverified claims. Both cases highlight how media can shape narratives at the expense of truth, eroding trust.
And that was almost 100 years ago
The regularly receive them for works of fiction. Why would they stop? This sort of coverage is feeding the vitriol that will get them another one.
NYT readers have no brains. MSM propagandists are also flooding into substack. Their subscriber numbers are suspicious and the comments are hilarious: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/trump-derangement-substack-correspondents-dinner
Well done. heather Richardson writes the same column over and over. Uses big words so her readers think they are smart.
Subscribing to you. Please consider subscribing to The Common Bridge.
My leftie friends are all losing their minds on Trump hate. Non-stop, no slight too small, no story too crazy, no spin too spun. The NY Times sells subscriptions to these people and will feed them. That is basically it. They don't care about accuracy, they don't care about balance. That has all left the building.
Trump hatred is akin to anti Semitism. Each is a retrovirus of the mind which the host can never get rid of.
I could enjoy watching lefties completely lose their minds over Trump even just being a feature in the zeitgeist let alone a President who they hate. But unfortunately, most of my family and friends are lefties who have little time for rational discussions about important matters. It's ad hominem, appeal to authority, blind adoration, false assumption, and pea brain explanations of the world.
It would be lovely to magic into existence a purely liberal state for them all to live in and then watch them leave it like rats fleeing a sinking ship under stupid pretenses rather than the obvious truth - progressivism and dogmatic atheism together make a giant bag of shit that nobody really wants.
Of course they have no shame.
They, along with the mainstream media outlets, ran that Palestina mother photo with her supposed starving baby when in fact he was suffering from a few health issues like cerebral palsy if I recall.
But that didn't stop the NYTIMEs from running the photo and the narrative.
Oh yeah they retracted the lie but the damage was done. They do this ALL the time.
Also CNN calling the Manhattan shooter white. Clearly he wasn’t & they knew it, but the damage was done- as was the goal.
Yes. Exactly!
That story from the NYT is so outrageous! That they would use the unfortunate circumstances of that mother and her son's medical condition as fodder for their inflammatory agenda of "starvation and genocide" is truly preditory and perverted. The cropping out of the healthy son only reinforces the deception. Unwittingly, what they managed to accomplish is the complete undermining of the "starvation" talking point. Supposedly "20,000" starving childern and the story they ran had absolutely nothing to do with "starvation". And their completely lame "correction" was as vile as the manipulated story itself. Only fools would continue to read a paper that still proves itself to be propagandized trash.
It's par for the course with the NYY
Turley's piece seems to say that even more evidence will be coming out that that foreign sources knew of the plan, above and beyond the classified annex which came out this week. He writes:
"Reports indicate that the CIA is about to declassify material showing that foreign sources were also in on the trick. The information reportedly indicates that foreign sources were aware of the move to create a Russian collusion scandal and expected that the FBI would play a role in the plan. "
Yes they have a lot more they will be releasing. The left behaves as if they showed everything they have - they haven’t. And I love the left’s typical premature reactions and accusations that will leave them all with egg on their faces. They have been doing that all year. They just want their beliefs about Trump to be true so badly they can’t help themselves.
When Nixon was taken down, the ‘tapes’ was the straw that broke the camels back, and those were only released after many months of negative press lead up. Could we bring seeing a similar story? If so we are still in the early chapters. And many from the Left will be lawyering up.
The problem the people of NYT have is the same problem genocidal maniacs, third-world dictators, islamists, and communists have. They suffer from ignorance of self and objectify all people to turn them into things. If people are things then they don't really matter. Such dehumanizing conversions are fundamental lies about our identities before the Creator.
Sad.
The times won a pulitzer for their being completely wrong about the Russian potemkin village scam that the times brought hook line and sinker about the communist utopia almost a century ago.
The NYT is a daily compendium of gaslit swamp propaganda and woke Marxist garbage. In other words, irrelevant.
Just like conservative news commentary has turn into?
Sasha, I love your reporting - but it's way past time to drop your subscription to the NYT. I dropped my 25+ year subscription at least 10 years ago when it became obvious the gray lady was nothing more than a consciously biased and disingenuous mouthpiece for the Democrat left and their narratives in its reporting. This bias became fully manifest when Bari Weiss left her formerly esteemed position with the Times due to disillusionment over the deterioration of the paper's reporting.
Make the NYT pay you to read their main stream misinformation.
I stopped believing MSM a long time ago. Anything I read or see in a paper or on TV news I take with a grain of salt. It's been reasonably easy to find sources that will tell the other or both sides of the story, you being one of them.
They'll beat the Epstein story to death to keep our eyes off Hillary and Barry, the DOJ, the FBI, and the corrupt intelligence services. If they had anything on Trump in the Epstein files, wouldn't it seem they'd use it? They threw everything including the kitchen sink, they wouldn't have withheld sex crimes if they had them.
You should always treat any news source today with the same standard. Almost all media today has an ulterior motive and most likely its a political party agenda.
We can now unfortunately add Substack authors to the list of sources who, by default, are not objective sources of truth; This one included.
I freely admit to subscribing to the Times for the last year. I find personal value in the overtly jaundiced reporting and I refuse to stay ignorant in an echo chamber. I feel obligated to know and witness how these “elite” reporters and editorialists choose to manipulate their base.
Yesterday they printed an article about a taco shop in California. Do New Yorkers, or Memphians like me for that matter, intend to travel LA to try a recommended taco? Please. It was an immigration editorial wrapped in a fake restaurant review. I was jogging down the street and laughing out loud. But then, there is one more reason for my five bucks a month…
… those fantastic recipes! Mmmmm… GOOD! 🤷🏻♂️😶😜😜😜
Haha! We have a subscription to the Chicago Tribune for much the same reason. It has turned into a liberal rag, mirroring much of the NYT articles. They fired all their conservative columnists over the past few years. We maintain the subscription purely for the sports section. And I guess also to see what stories the Communist agenda is pushing. I assume this is why Sasha needs to keep her subscription. You can’t really criticize the paper on hearsay.
Well if they didn't cover whether the hot sauce was adobo or tomatillo, I'd cancel my subscription
The list of NYT dishonesty, misdirection and political bias is long. Just this week, the NYT used a cropped photo of a Gazan child with debilitating muscular dystrophy and claimed he was suffering from malnutrition to reinforce their false narrative about Palestinian "starvation."
To bolster their report, the NYT relies on a terrorist death cult, Hamas, and a collection of corrupt NGOs as their sole information sources. They tap into an avid readership of delusional true believers to pay the bills.
In news story after news story, the NYT’s arrogant disregard for the truth is obvious. Now a garbage publication, the NYT is dishonest and untrustworthy. It has become a bad leftist joke.
The times has never been respectable, check out their Moscow Chief in the 1930s, one Walter Durante, an apologist for Stalins famines. He got a Pulitzer then, nothing has changed at. The Slimes.
The democrats/leftists/media, but I repeat, are using Epstein as a distraction from the perfidy and sedition of the Obama.
What Sedition and if it was why didn't Biden pardon him? Being a traitor does not make you immune from the law Nixon taught us that. MAGA have the critical thinking skills of a minion because if they actually did they would see Trump just hyping constantly. This drip feed constantly feeding of anger has numbed the minds.
What are you talking about "hyping constantly"? Obama has some immunity and Biden knew that and Biden also knewTrump's DOJ probably won't go after him (after talking so much about how a president was NEVER INDICTED in the history of our country), even though he's the most corrupt pres we've ever had.....well, maybe Wilson is worse.
Because Trump told you? God you follow his every word so much no questions nothing.
I haven't heard what Trump has said for the last week or two. I'm talking about Trump's DOJ and speculating what they'd do.
“My political advice to Democrats is continue to tell everyone who thinks Sydney Sweeney is attractive is a NAZl.”
-VP JD Vance, today
Just like MAGA calls all democrats Communists...
If you look like a duck, act like a duck, swim like a duck, quack like a duck, smell like a duck, but are really a communist, you're a communist duck.
Act like a cultist, talk like a cultist, think like a cultist, defend like a cultist guess what that makes you?
Act like an ass, talk like an ass, think like an ass, squawk like an ass, I guess that makes you an ass.
Not an ounce of creativity. Take someone else's comment, change a few words, and call it your own....Liberal Plagiarism. That's what got Joe Biden where is is today....a washed-up has-been thief. You're pathetic.
Look at Mamdani - he is a communist and he's running as a Democrat-aligned candidate. Dems are a gazillion times more like communists than Reps are Nazis. In fact, Reps are, in no way, aligned or 'like' Nazis.
You believe every word Trump says... I feel sorry for you.
I haven't listened to anything Trump has said in a week or two. What I just commented is what I SAID and what I BELIEVE and I BELIEVE what I BELIEVE by way of listening to Mamdani and Republican politicians.
Which Democrats have been called “Communists “?
Look at BB, Fox, PJmedia, American Thinker even posters on here they paint the entire party as Communists
Do you think Sydney Sweeney is attractive?
HL3 is neither man, nor woman, nor human. It is an AI troll placed here for artificial attention. Please don't feed it.
I think many woman are attractive and most of the time its their behavior not their looks. Skin deep aspect is why both males and females have become so shallow and ugly character wise no wonder why we have such a low marriage rate.
AOC, Jamaal Bowman, Corey Bush, Bernie Sanders, Mamdani - they currently are Democrat Socialists or in the past, voted for Democrat Socialists.
And today’s Progs think that is so cool.