As a man who used to follow Tucker, pay for his content, and root for his success, I can say with absolute certainty that I have not changed, Tucker has. He is now a tool for the same globalist parasites he used to rage against. Tucker has zero credibility and it’s really disappointing because he could have been a powerful force for good.
Ditto. Actually, Mega-dittos. I was also an admitted fan and defender of Tucker Carlson right up until about 2 or 3 months ago when I finally grew too weary of his abandonment of President Trump's courageous battle against the financially powerful Globalist Establishment and Tucker's (naive? calculated?) willingness to embrace narratives that were so painfully obvious as "MAGA-splitter" themes. Disgusted, I canceled my membership from his platform and stopped following him on X, besides not watching any of his interviews since then. He'll deny it profusely but he allowed his latent narcissism to rise and then dominate his entire approach and perspectives.
I agree. The really sad part is that Megyn could have been a strong voice against the propaganda of the left, which is drowning out all of great accomplishments achieved by the Trump Administration over the past year.
I was done finally with Megyn when she became the 24/7 Nancy Guthrie True Crime Channel. She's a click-baiter who comes from the mainstream "news" world where getting eyeballs is all that matters. Whatever you have to do to get them, that's what you do this week.
OMG!! me too. It was so damn boring. Good grief- a full two weeks of shows dedicated to all of that. Then she had Joe Kent on. Nope. I'm done. She finally did have Victor Davis Hanson on last week. He was gracious to do it.
Looks like a lot of us feel the same way. Megyn is going for cheap shoddy thrills, using her law degree to pretend she can tell crime stories like an insider, and alternate them with stupid girly fashion/gossip insider guests. I expect she's losing fans. I get that she doesn't approve of another Middle East war, but this one literally is the one that will end all of them. Iran has been stirring up the differences in the region for decades, and Trump is the only one who can unite them. Megyn is too impressed with herself.
It was how she and Tucker refused to condemn the horrific treatment of Ericka Kirk by Candace (along with Tucker featuring “brilliant” historians like Darryl Cooper who claimed Churchill was a war criminal) that lost both for me.
It is sad when such folks reveal their true motives as nothing more than $$, especially when both Tucker and Megyn were eager to ride the Trump train during the 2024 election, merely to bask in reflected glory. A type of stolen valor, actually.
Megyn Kelly baffles me. She seems so loyal to Tucker even though she is constantly saying she "has her own mind". She should know better. She finally had Victor Davis Hanson on this past week. That was a good move. I don't know why she went off the rails though. It's annoying.
She acted like she had no clue that VDH has been respectfully critical of both Tucker and herself. VDH is always a gentleman. Even when he is critical.
I see Megyn somewhat differently. Tucker seems indifferent (if not insanely eager) to the GOP's potential loss of control at the midterms, while Megyn seems (justifiably, I would say) terrified of that happening, pointing to the schism that Trump's support of Israel has caused. The venom with which she says the words "Israel" and "Netanyahu" is pretty shocking. Both my wife (who Megyn helped leave the Left, for which I am forever grateful) and I have stopped listening to her very often (it used to be daily), ESPECIALLY on the "true-crime" Fridays. I'm guessing a lot of people have stopped, which may have been the reason for her having the refreshingly sane VDH on as a guest recently. On to Triggernometry!!
1000% sad to see all of these supposed lovers of the American way and American democracy suddenly pretend like we have lost our way because the only man left on earth able to stand up against the machine couldn’t be bought as easily as they were.
The “America First” crowd does not know history very well. They don’t understand that the huge problem with NGO fraud had its origins in the same idea.
When the Soviet Union collapsed, people were giddy about the supposed “peace dividend”. We could use that money to solve hunger, and homelessness, and give everyone health care. It will be great! And better yet, let’s give all that money to private charities, who will surely use it wisely to solve all our problems.
Forty years later, we are drowning in more of the same problems, along with unaccountable NGOs who have defrauded America on a scale earlier grifters couldn’t even dream of. Yet there are still those who believe we can use all of that money to solve America’s problems. Just give us the money!
The problem is unaccountable government giving taxpayer money (nothing they earned) to another class of unaccountable parasites, NGOs. When private wealth funds NGOs there is a somewhat better chance of accountability, though it is not assured. We know that from all the stupid billionaire trusts who funded BLM and NPLC among many other fraudulent "charities". People need to be more critical of where they give their money. Too many are corrupt and anti-American
It's easy to sit in your little cozy studio and yap but it's the big man, Superman President Trump who has the cojones to stand up against anyone and anything for the good of the future of this country and our grandchildren etal. I guess many people are just too stupid to understand there IS someone like that in this world unlike those (insert names) that have/do nothings like Biden and Harris etal. Not only sad; it's VERY scary for all of us.
One man IS the machine. Trump has pocketed billions since coming into office. He isn't a president so much as the Trump fam operate as a crime syndicate. He said himself yesterday... he doesn't care about the average american or cost of living. Look at what he's doing. starting a war to distract from the Epstein files. and focusing on a ball room, putting his face on the $100 bill, gold statues of himself, forcing his face into our passports... he is the epitome of the malignant narcissist & fooled his followers to think he's for 'draining the swamp' and fighting for the little guy.
That’s me as well and just don’t understand the total schism. I can understand being anti war and hurt by the appearance of a broken promise but Tucker has gone bonkers.
Seconded. Don’t forget that during Trump 1.0 Glenn Beck went around the bend, becoming a never-trumper but he came back around to sanity. Will it happen to TC? Who knows? Time will tell. I was with him all the way - actually haven’t watched FNC since they sandbagged him - until recently. Canceled my subscription. Don’t understand his reasoning; is Trump perfect? Not hardly! But you’re going to put faith in the stupid - STUPID - Republicans? The only thing they seem intent on doing is losing “gracefully”. We’re not on the field of Waterloo & it’s not 1815; The Marquess of Queensbury Rules don’t apply nor should they. This is a barroom brawl with the two sides lacking testosterone; one side suffers from it more than the other thankfully.
Why Tucker lost his way? Judging from his fixation on demons and such about a year and a half ago, I seriously think he's on something. He IS a recovering alcoholic; maybe he's found a new drug or something. No question that he's become unhinged.
How does he do it? I knew that he's got slippery techniques and is expert at it. There was an exchange in late 23 or 24 where an Aussie journalist came at him during a Q&A and he destroyed her; so he's a black belt, but just how does he do it? ....
Well, here's a fantastic analysis of just how these types (TC, Owens, Jones...) do it. It's incredibly powerful. It's about a half-hour and is worth its weight in gold.:
There have been indications that he’s off the wagon, either with alcohol, and/or drugs. While I don’t want to fall into the trap of un-named sources, I have to give some credence to this theory, particularly because the source I heard it from is in the rehab community and has had lots and lots of experience in the addiction treatment world. And, one needs to consider his behavior. Tucker is doing a lot of damage to the MAGA movement and to the Republican Party as a whole, as are the individuals mentioned above.
While follow the money won’t explain his motivation, I’m past giving a rats ass about his motivation. I do care about who is funding his “opinion”. So yes, FOLLOW THE MONEY!
I’m not so sure. Just last week I learned that Tucker has sued his stepsister for a share of her inheritance, even though the will excludes Tucker and his brother. Obviously, he has way more money than I do, but ironically, being rich has never stopped anyone from being endlessly greedy for more money.
You can be off the wagon and still hold the same beliefs you held prior to your fall. This is a guy desperate for money. Who has likely fallen into some blackmail with the Arabs to boot.
Agree. Something is motivating him, whether it’s blackmail, money, MK Ultra, meh feelings hurt, whatever. Probably a combo. Either way, he doesn’t give a shit what he’s doing to the conservatives!
I don't think it's drugs. I think it's money... I think Qatar owns Tucker now.
Thanks for sharing that vid, it's a good one! I never heard of Jeremy Boreing before, but I already added him to my podcasts list. He did a great job of describing Tucker's tactics, but he didn't even mention that stupid fake laugh that Tucker uses... He uses it in such a condescending way, it has always pissed me off... even back I agreed with what he was saying.
The very crazy laugh jolts me in a very uncomfortable way and a big part of my disdain for him and his attempts at whatever schtick he's trying to ;pull off...I never did understand the excitement over him and just watched the interview by the woman journalist and it was like watching a horror movie.
Yeah Vicki, even back when I liked the angle he was pushing, I always hated that stupid fake laugh. It made me embarrassed before my own self to think that I somehow like this guy.. It's like he thinks he's talking to retards... He often uses it in an ass-kissing sychophantic way too, trying to encourage his guest to say more about whatever the topic is.
You do realize that Pam Bondi had to register FARA working for Qatar, right?
Might want to check out evidence coming out that Epstein's legal team is suing Candace Owens for Bryan Harpole. Wonder what it means when Dillon is working for a foreign agent while keeping one of their principles in the US Attorney General's office.
Curiously all of these "off the rails" and "who's he paid by" types never want to confront his arguments. I'm 100% open to the idea that TC is wrong but his haters want to focus on everything but what he's addressing. Reminds me of when Matt Taibbi started calling out authoritarian/woke/censorship culture and he was met with a flood of "what happened to you?" critiques
You’re a one trick pony dude. Most of us have been following Tucker for a decade+. You’re just here because you hate Joos. Trite, bro. At least be honest about your bias.
Question; Is being against war with Iran "joo hatred"? Whats the inverse of that? That being anti-war is anti-joo? Are you suggesting that joos are innately war mongers? Sounds to me like you're the anti-semite bro. Implying that jews just support warfare innately. I'm confused.
You as a human support warfare innately. You might not understand that anymore because you can very nearly order Cheetos through “telepathy,” but to have gotten to that point required warfare.
It was never optional. There is no world where peace exists in which the only blood spilled was through your menstruations.
You stating you’re flatly against something doesn’t register as enlightened. Without any reasons given it sounds hollow and extremely gay af. Technically speaking.
Iran - by their own admission - has enriched uranium well past the point of fueling power plants. It’s weapons grade. Here’s some logic, nobody should want Iran to have a nuclear weapon because Iran will actually use a nuclear weapon. Why, do you suppose, none of Irans allies have ever sold them nukes? Or just given them a few like the BFFs they claim to be?
I’ll tell you why, because Iranian Islamist extremists (the regime) are fucking crazy. They don’t even operate on your deranged leftist frequency. They’re on another plane of existence where self-annihilation is a welcome reward.
Try answering my question before I indulge your "the only real world is one where blood is spilled through the sword" mentality.
By your logic I'm " technically gay"? LOL. Us Americans are not really into tribal blood feud, Are Iranians crazy? Wow. Prove it. Otherwise you're full of shit.
I would love to be educated on how Iran was a nuclear threat- according to Trump- despite the fact that Trump claims he "obliterated" their nuclear facilities. And that Tulsi Gabbard said Iran wasn't pursuing a nuke. And that Iran said there was a FATWA in Iran against nukes. Please, Help me understand why Iran is Evil!
I can understand not wanting war. It’s normal to have an aversion to war. But help you understand why Iran is evil?? What part of theocratic 7th century death cult mullahs don’t you understand?
I'm pretty sure I'm wasting my time; however, I used to be a strong supporter of TC, pre Fuentes/WW 2 revisionism/ and, of course the demon dogs in his bed... So what's below is in hope of showing you a more coherent take than from some trust fund recovering alcoholic:
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been a leading public voice defending the U.S. strikes on Iran, framing them as necessary, preemptive, and limited in scope. His statements emphasize preventing Iran from ever acquiring nuclear weapons, degrading its conventional military capabilities (especially missiles that could shield a nuclear program), and protecting U.S. forces and allies.
Key Themes from Rubio's Statements (Early–Mid 2026)Preemptive Self-Defense and Timing:Rubio described the U.S. action as preemptive to protect American personnel. Intelligence showed Israel was preparing strikes, and Iran would likely retaliate against U.S. bases/forces. Acting first minimized U.S. casualties.
"Why now?": Diplomacy failed; Iran rejected offers for a peaceful nuclear program and was building a "conventional shield" (missiles, drones, navy) to deter intervention in its nuclear ambitions.
Core Objectives:Destroy Iran's ballistic missile production and launchers, navy, and air force capabilities. This prevents Iran from using conventional weapons to "hide behind" and pursue nuclear weapons unchecked.
"We’re going to destroy their navy, destroy their air force. We are going to basically destroy their ability to make missiles and drones... so they can never hide behind these things to get a nuclear weapon."
No ground troops needed; operations are on/ahead of schedule and achievable from the air.
Nuclear Red Line:"There is no way in the world that this terroristic regime was going to get nuclear weapons, not under Donald Trump's watch." Iran has repeatedly rejected peaceful nuclear energy deals and seeks weapons. A nuclear Iran under "radical Shia clerics with an apocalyptic vision" is unacceptable.
Any future deal must permanently prevent sprinting to a bomb. Rubio has signaled skepticism toward Iranian offers (e.g., on the Strait of Hormuz), calling the strait an international waterway and Iran's control an "economic nuclear weapon."
Broader Context:Rubio has noted the mission could reach a "finish line" in weeks (not months) and reiterated no regime change by U.S. ground forces—change should come from within Iran if at all.
He has pushed back on criticism, stressing clear objectives from day one and coordination with allies (while criticizing some NATO partners for limited support).
Rubio's messaging aligns closely with President Trump's but often provides more detailed policy explanations in press briefings, interviews (e.g., Fox News), and congressional appearances. He has consistently tied the operation to long-standing U.S. policy against Iranian nuclearization while expanding it to conventional threats. These positions reflect the administration's view that decisive action was required after years of sanctions, diplomacy, and prior limited strikes proved insufficient.
**********
Rubio has consistently and tirelessly explained the above.
Do you want me to now discuss how the regime's political foundation is an eschatological framework? And how neatly nukes and this orientation fit together in a terrifying manner?
Thats a lot of text without addressing any of the counter points I made. Is Tulsi Gabbard full of shit or not? Were the facilities "obliterated" or not?
Also it's not a good look to cite Rubio telling us that Israel was going to do whatever it wanted and we had to react lest US service members be killed. That sounds like a tail wagging the dog to anyone with a functioning brain.
Jeremy Boreing is conflating anti-Israel with anti-Semitism. That's the same slippery technique to shut down criticism of DEI ("racist"!), sexualizing / transing children ("--phobic!"), and wanting informed consent for medical decisions ("anti-science!").
When we can see what Isreal does, we don't need the influence of anyone else.
Raping prisoners is wrong. Raping prisoners with dogs is wrong. Donating obscene amounts to nearly Every US congressperson is wrong. Blowing up entire buildings is wrong. https://x.com/AlanRMacLeod/status/2049723243595280554 - Netanhayu posted this on his Twitter. Celebrating blowing up buildings.
And the problem is Tucker and Candace (and Baron Coleman, and others) noticing that this is actually demonic? No, the problem is doing the demonic things.
Exact same tactic as demonizing those who criticize trans surgeries for children.
Shooting children trying to get food when there is no "terrorist activity" within sight is wrong.
And conflating having a problem with all this - and that our taxes fund it - with hating all Jews, is a technique to shut down thought.
Um, why is blowing up entire buildings wrong when those buildings are harboring Hamas missiles which are aimed at your country?
Candace is the worst example you could use of any kind of moral arbiter. She did a sympathetic profile of predator Harvey Weinstein. She accuses Erika Kirk of being complicit in her own husband's assassination. She is odious.
Sasha, Tucker has become poisonous. Stop talking about him. We all used to watch and listen to him on CNN and Fox. He made sense at one time. Now he has a screw loose and is illogical and unreasoned. Like Candace Owens, he poisons his own well
Yup. Just think of all the amazing things that the Trump Administration has achieved (see Coffee & Covid Substack by Jeffery Childers) over the past year and Tucker could have been a loud voice standing against the left wing news media and their lies. A tragedy of epic proportions.
Sasha should NOT apologize for posting his videos before. He had a reasonable voice that made a big difference and woke many sleeping people up. She is handling this right. When he stopped being reasonable and selfless he became toxic to this country. Both can be true for the time each happened.
I commend her for showcasing him and then seeing what she is now seeing and choosing to speak out against it.
I have NEVER been a fan of Tucker and I saw him in person speaking to a small gathering. To me he is just an annoyance and now he's sealed his fate for me. I am surprised at Megyn although her talk has gotten more crude for my taste. What's the point of that Candace Owens, period? Why are these people getting press?
Who is he really and where does he come from and what makes him an expert on anything? It's all a mystery to me...he talks to fast and that crazy laugh....I can't take him, never could. I don't get the fascination with him or Candace and those types.
As a true indication of his character. After following him for years and an annual subscriber, I sensed a change a few months ago. He became more shrill, more ego, so I complained. But having several months left on the subscription, he would not refund the balance. His is a voice for one thing. Money.
There are obviously other forces at work here that he’s simping for the globalists — he has his bunker, he’ll be fine but the hellscape that we inhabit will only get worse and worse
We in California know this first hand
The assembly only worries about lining their pockets cheating to win elections
Might be easier to address what you feel he is lying about. Please tell us where he is wrong. Just one thing. Maybe something he said talking with Huckabee?
You won’t lose me, Sasha. As one of the people who suggested that you not platform him, I see you as that rare person in the media who will report what is true, as and when you see it.
Totally agree with you, JMAC. Sasha, you can count on us conservative, critical thinkers to continue following/subscribing. Even when we may not always agree, we loyalists won't pout and flounder out. We're in this together with you!
Totally agree with JMAC and Beth, you won't lose me Sasha. You write and voice what I'm thinking and feeling so well that I feel I know you and we’d be besties in RL.
Something has gone tragically wrong in Tucker’s brain—I can only sum it up to a personal vendetta against Trump and MAGA and I find it sad and stupid.
Sasha you’re right on about Tucker. I watched him nightly on Fox, followed him as a paid subscriber in order to support his new venture. The last interview I watched was with Mike Huckabee, even though I had unsubscribed last fall with his platforming of Fuentes & Ian Carroll. He seemed completely unhinged with Huckabee; he even did a 15 minute intro into that discussion attempting to sway viewers by controlling the narrative before given a chance to watch it. Tucker seemed to change, at least publicly, after his father’s death. One common thread with all these woke reich, now leftists, is their hatred for Israel & therefore Trump. Nobody with a functioning brain wants war, but with Iran it was necessary imo. Otherwise you end up with another nuclear power like N. Korea because you waited too long to deal with it. Though because Iran is controlled by a crazy Theocracy that hates Israel & the US, it makes them even more dangerous if armed. Just ask the other ME countries why they support Trump on this. Your instincts are spot on with Tucker & the rest of that group - all you have to recognize is who loves him now - the NY Times & other individuals & institutions with severe TDS & antisemitic discourse. I’d venture a guess most of your readers are savvy enough to recognize these changes & agree with you.
You are 💯 correct. Tucker has gone off the rails. He claims to be a Christian, but as you said, his rhetoric is likely to harm millions of average Americans who don’t have the nearly unlimited resources he has to shield himself and his family. Very narcissistic and childish behavior, IMHO.
Pastor Josh Howerton took on Carlson in a recent podcast showing just how much he does not understand Christianity. It was a gold level podcast. Carlson has become irrelevant. I have no idea who his followers are, but he is prepping for a fall from grace where they are concerned.
There was a wall of support for Tucker that held up far too long after he went off the rails. It started crumbling slowly and now quickly. Those of us with very high expectations for J.D. becoming our next President are hoping he will have the courage to take on Tucker as well.
Isn't he already? All his enemies now are the same as for the Progressives. He is almost completely aligned with the Far Left. Megyn Kelly is headed the same direction as is Candace Owens. Glad for them. Let them join their totalitarian anti-American, Hamas and Iran-loving comrades
JD’s misplaced loyalty to Tucker Qatarlson has really soured me on him. Now I’m hoping that the GOP can find someone else to run for president, with better looks/charisma (important, since we live in an ever more superficial society) and better values.
I watched the interview, it seemed to me that he is subtly trying to influence Vance to come out against Trump. None of us can say exactly where Vance’s head is in all of this but Tucker was definitely trying to hitch his wagon onto Vance’s. Surprisingly I don’t bought the NYT lady did an excellent job asking all the right questions politely and pushing back on his often vague or Kamala type answers.
Howerton isn't afraid of anything. He's also willing to talk about politics and sees that as part of his calling. As he often says, when good people (Christians )don't speak up, bad people (Satan) will fill the gap.
And he doesn’t know the Bible like he thinks he does. He twists books like Esther to fit his perspective & narrative that Israel has a history of genocide, by retelling half the story & deliberately taking it out of context. His ego is now being pumped up with talk of him running for President.
if you lose subscribers because you're willing to express your frustration with tucker, they weren't worth keeping. well, except for that money thing. ;) you're the best sasha!
Tucker is just an egomaniac who cares only about himself and money. He threw it all away. He has zero integrity and credibility. Who gives a damn what he thinks.
Unfortunately, many people do. That’s the rub. How does someone like Candace Owen have such a large following when all she does is spew hate and nonsense? There are a lot of gullible people around!
The change has left me feeling sad, too… like losing a comrade in arms. I was incensed on his behalf when FOX dumped him - and in so underhand a way, the day following a disgusting hit piece by 60 Minutes timed so he wouldn’t have an opportunity to answer. Only two things really bugged me about Tucker’s show was that, at least initially, he had less-than-compelling guests; some just weren’t terribly bright. That, and his manner of breaking into forced laughter, a habit or tic that is off putting but not disastrous. A year ago I defended him vigorously to family members who had given up and believed his train had derailed, and I still feel strongly that he stood up for unpopular, but in my view true, perspectives and beliefs that society had all but disallowed. But now I struggle to see how I could have considered Tucker (and Candace, too) intelligent and brave, their “on-air personas” are so radically different today.
I've been watching some docs on Netflix on cults. I think I should have been a sociologist. There are so, so many who fall prey to the cultish mindset. In one doc of the twin sisters was pulled in and is still there. The nature and nurture of her life was the same as the twin, for all intents and purposes. So, these are people who love cult of conspiracy theories and theorists.
Tucker is and always has been "the useful idiot". He and Hannity were nothing more than controlled opposition for the Pravda MSM media. Never forget his dad worked for the CIA. He is basically an MK Ultra Psyop.
You don’t have to apologize for this war with Iran, Sasha. It’s easily the most justified, competent, efficient war effort of our lifetimes, and as far as competency and efficiency, in all of history.
Iran is London and London is behind every bad foreign policy muck of the past 3 centuries. Trump is the guy that is doing something about it, on MANY fronts.
I will plug Promethean Action for their brilliant reporting on this.
Yeah. I am very upset with Trump over his decision to launch the Iran War, but the idea that questionable move should prompt a complete rejection of Trump and his entire agenda is rather suspicious.. Something smells fishy to me... I think a rather large sum of money has changed hands.
Our new podcasting utopia, in which individual voices get to speak unhindered by unseen corporate masters, has crashed on the shores of ego and ambition.. It's not about "truth," it's about getting the clicks.. Everybody wants to be a YouTube star.. sigh...
Look up Promethean Action. I think they will help make the war make more sense to you. They put things in a historical context that is unique and revealing, at least it has been to me!
Truth be told, I'm pretty aware of the historical context of the Iran War, starting with the CIA overthrow of Mossadegh in 1953... Yes, Iran is a threat, no a full scale attack at this moment was not the answer.. But maybe Trump can stick the landing, fingers crossed.
Yep, the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company convinced the CIA that Mossadegh was going Commie.. Hence, the overthrow of a democratically elected leader, replaced by a military guy who cosplayed as Shah. See, anti-semites, it isn't just Israel that manipulates US foreign policy, our other great ally GB has been doing it since at least the 1890s.
Finally remembered the title of a solid book on the US, GB and Iran in the early 50s: Mary Anne Heiss, Empire and Nationhood: The US, GB, and Iranian Oil, 1950-1954,
It was now or never. This was the best moment for a full scale attack. We saw what decades of leadership did with it at the expense of our pocketbooks. Trump only has four years to do what should have been done by all of them. He had to move fast. Frankly with him in the White House it was the perfect time.
And as far as anyone not in the room knows, they DID have intelligence of what Iran was doing to make future defense from them near impossible.
Some argue that Allen Dulles was behind this operation in Iran in 1953 in order to protect his oil friends because Mossadegh was going to Nationalize Iranian oil. Thoughts ?
The great battle of civilization is between dysrationality (pathological irrationality) and rationality. The latter is a requirement for civilization. The former arises with entitlement. It also causes tribalism. It has killed every single civilization since Adam and Eve.
There are those on the left and right who are tribal (dysrational). Tucker is one.
Free will (SELF-control) is required to escape it.
The major problem is that you need more than a majority of conservatives if you intend to win the midterms. Thats why Trump was so great, he could energize other groups that nobody else could.
Not sure last attempt posted. Right there with you Sasha for the reasons you articulate so well. And because I believe, the best is still ahead. Blessing!
Tucker - pffft. He’s the principled conservative bill Kristol, who has jettisoned every one of his conservative principles because he hates Trump so much, of the preening pontificating podcast world.
And does he still live in Maine? I thought he was a qatarian now. He’s chosen the mohammedan side. What a guy.
Wholeheartedly support you on this Sasha. Tucker lost credibility with me a long time ago. God is bigger than anything or anyone. This interview is just one of the many demonic attacks on our republic. May 17th we are dedicating our nation back to God. The demons and trolls are out in full force. They are already defeated. Let's continue to stand together and with one voice for our nation and for President Trump.
And Chatsworth's mother was always surprised when she examined currency. She would hold up a twenty dollar bill and say "Hmm... I didn't know they were still making money in such small denominations!" 😂
You forgot the part when Trump went live, and said he didn’t want us anymore: the portion of the MAGA movement who was against pedophilia, pro America first, for rebuilding America, before we start meddling and overseas affairs. Trump from the campaign Trail and whatever is going on in the Trump White House now bears no resemblance to each other. Our entire foreign policy revolves around Israel and seizing oilfield. The cost of living for everyday Americans to skyrocketed under Trump and he has trashed the Marjorie Taylor greens, Thomas Massey‘s, and many others who are true loyal supporters. As soon as someone disagrees with one word of what king Trump says we are slimy leftist traders Democrats in his warped mind.
Trump betrayed himself and America. That’s why Tucker et al. have Broken with him.
Well said and the tip of the iceberg. Notable that the only resistance you face in replies is ad hominem. Also noteworthy how vast majority of comments here are turning into ad hominem.
What comes in coming days will only open minds in proportion to what minds will hear. Look forward to hearing from Candace Owens, Baron Coleman, DenksterIntel, BayesisBased, AllisonTopFiles, Lionel, ValhallaVFT and a growing list of youtubers in coming days.
Bryan Harpole just sued Owens for ruining his security career. As if letting his biggest customer die in front of the world did not wreck his career.
More important: turns out Harpole's attorney is Dillon. The same Dillon that has Trump's pick for #3 in Attorney General's office. The same Dillon that had Dershowitz, Ken Starr and others working for Epstein. The same Dillon working for registered foreign agents Israel.
If memory serves, this is Carlson's main issue with Trump. He is MakeIsraelGreatAgain not MAGA now.
Agreed. And if standing against wars in the Middle East is going to split the Republican party, so be it. It is likely something similiar may happen to the Democrats.
The 2 most important things on which Trump campaigned, and his most important achievements, are in the areas of immigration and energy. He closed the borders, and has forcibly deported or encouraged the self-deportation of large numbers of illegal immigrants, despite persistent opposition from activist judges and activist interference in and resistance to ICE. He has also reversed policies aimed at discouraging the extraction and use of oil and gas and displacing these energy sources with electricity generated using intermittent 'green' energy technologies such as solar and wind. Everywhere the latter energy technologies have been widely deployed (see Western Europe), the result has been skyrocketing electricity prices and less reliability electric grids. If you want to take your ball and go home because you didn't get what you wanted in other areas, you will deserve what you get -- open borders and expensive and unreliable energy. You will also get more crime, more DEI, more gender ideology, and so forth. One more thing -- Trump shut down USAID. Good riddance.
There is no evidence that Epstein was a pedophile. The definition of a pedophile is an adult who is sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children. None of the women who claim to have been Epstein 'survivors' fit this profile. None of the teenage girls who gave Epstein 'sexual massages' were kidnapped or otherwise forced to come to his home. No, they went to his home voluntarily because their girlfriends told them Epstein would pay them $200 each for a massage. The youtube channel Soft White Underbelly has interviewed several of these self-proclaimed teenage 'victims,' and they all acknowledged going to Epstein's home because they wanted to make a quick buck. I'm not sympathetic with their stories. The idea that some organized pedophile rape ring plays some significant role in the US political system is a baseless conspiracy theory peddled by internet shysters to losers.
Influencers who oppose Trump's foreign policy in Iran, Venezuela or elsewhere fall into 2 categories: morons and traitors. The morons are people who believe that if we focus exclusively on domestic problems, the rest of the world will live us in peace. That's not the way the world works. It's the same as believing that the schoolyard bully will leave you alone if you leave him alone. Sorry, no. Once in a while you have to use 'hard power', i.e. kick some ass, to send the message 'don't eff with us.' You have to demonstrate that your military is powerful and effective. Message delivered in Venezuela and Iran. The traitors are those who believe in and support the idea of a multipolar world -- that the world would be better off if other world powers, especially China and Russia, displaced the United States as the leading superpower, or that the United States should share power to a greater extent with these other world powers. Tucker seems to be firmly in the traitor camp. MTG appears to be just a moron, but you never know. Her net worth certainly went up sharply during her stint in Congress.
But you go ahead, sit in your basement listening to conspiracy-peddling influencers, and stew about pedophiles or the Mossad blackmailing US politicians. Wack away.
You probably can’t stick your head much further in the sand that it already is, and I don’t even know if it’s possible to extract at this point, but if you gave even a cursory view to the tiny little bit that Was released from the Epstein documents, there are thousands and thousands of references to sexual acts with children well beneath the 17 year old Age range that you are claiming
Are all these claims credible?
Probably not. But, one of the signature promises of the Trump campaign was that everything was going to be released come what made. That hasn’t happened. As more than one person‘s pointed out, if there’s nothing to hide, why the tens of thousands of redactions? Just answer that one question please why redact something that doesn’t exist. There are dozens and dozens of women who have gone on the record over and over again saying that they were trafficked and they weren’t 17 years old.
Just answer that one question please why redact something that doesn’t exist. There are dozens and dozens of women who have gone on the record over and over again saying that they were trafficked and they weren’t 17 years old.
Regardless of whether you think Trump‘s foreign policies is good or not, it stands in direct contradiction to what he promised over and over and over and over again. Trump 2.0 is a complete betrayal of what he promised. Maybe you think that’s a good thing, but it doesn’t change the fact that he lied and he continued to lie and his sabotaging a few good patriots left in this country like Thomas Massey and Marjorie Taylor Greene.
You’re calling anyone who actually stands at the American constitution a traitor says a lot about where your true true loyalties lie. Trade her to whom? Trader to Israel, Israel? Yes Tucker and I in many hundreds of thousands of other people are definitely treasonous if you think our loyalty should lie with those scumbags and Tel Aviv. But we are not traders to our own country. Many of us have worn the uniforms and been sent overseas on these bullshit missions for bullshit special interest. So just fess up and put in your bio where your loyalty is truly lie. It sure as hell isn’t with America. I have a sneaking suspicion. You would vote for Netanyahu for president if you could.
If you think the age at which girls reach puberty is 17, you are more of a moron than your rant suggests. Michael Tracey has looked at the available records, and he found no evidence of 'thousands and thousands of references to sexual acts with children.' According to Tracey, the tens of thousands of redactions were made at the request of the shyster lawyers working (i.e. chalking up big bucks in lawyers' fees) working on behalf of the so-called survivors, and the redactions were implemented to protect their identities. A 14 year old girl is not a child. The word 'trafficked' implies that someone was physically kidnapped or otherwise forced to participate in some sexual act with Epstein, and there is no evidence of that type of activity. If you are 14 years old and you go to Epstein's house because you were told that you can earn $200 for giving him a massage, don't pretend that you are a victim of sexual abuse if he asks you engage in some additional sexual acts. By the time a girl is 14, she should know better than to put herself in the position of being alone with an adult male, or even a boy her age, if she doesn't want to engage in sexual acts with him.
Trump didn't promise over and over again not to use military intervention against Iran. During his first administration, he retracted Obama's deal on nuclear enrichment with Iran, and he ordered the assassination of Iranian military officer Soleimani. You have only yourself to blame if you are too stupid to read Trump correctly. See Michael Tracey on Trump's views on Iran.
MTG is a whore, and Massey is just another demagogue politician trying to exploit the fog surrounding Epstein, in collaboration with lefty Ro Kanna, who is one of the politicians responsible for the destruction of California. And I think it stinks that he married a former congressional staffer (of Rand Paul) only 16 months after his first wife's death. Maybe that's why Massie is so interested in the Epstein thing -- he wants to distract the attention of gullible fools like you from all the hanky panky he and other Congressman are engaging in with the whores who staff congress. You know what they say about sex and politics.
I disagree with your thesis about Tucker, but would never unsubscribe because I happen to disagree with you on this. During these very rocky times among conservatives, I love reading and listening to people on the other side of this issue, to see if I am missing something in my own analyses and positions. I listen to his podcasts and I listen to Tucker's guests, and I do my own research through source documents or listening to other podcasters' guests (who, TRUE, may also have the same "bent", have been in government or research or some other "insider" information), and I tend to agree with his analyses and his positions. I really don't think he is a shill or is out for vengeance against Fox or anyone by telling lies - after all, the best vengeance is to be proven CORRECT! I DO agree with you that Tucker's openness about what he thinks is happening with Trump, TPUSA, the MAGA movement, etc. is harmful to our unity and our ability to maintain the House and Senate in the midterms. Personally, I can agree with Tucker, et al., and set that aside to know that we have a binary choice in our elections (at least for now) and as sure as God made little green apples, the Democrats are the existentially worse choice. Hands down. However, I would love to see more Marjorie Taylor Greene- and Thomas Massie-like Republicans running for office.
Personally, I don't think MTG is anti-Semitic. I think questioning other country's governments motives is healthy - we criticize other nations without being called anti-name the country. Why is Israel exempt from that criticism or questioning? We ABSOLUTELY criticize and actually demonize (maybe not all of us, but I will speak for myself and many of my likeminded friends) Islam, which I guess makes me Islamophobic, but in the U.S., that Islamophobia seems to be celebrated. After all, isn't that why we are at war with Iran?????? I know, I know, the current acceptable government trope is that we are at war with Iran because they have (which they didn't) nuclear weapons, but we all know the truth: we are at war with Iran because we have been indoctrinated into believing that all Palestinians and all Iranians and all Lebanese are supporting Muslim extremists and they send their proxy terrorists to destroy Israel. Perhaps, it has been the other way around for the last 40 or so years? I don't know, I'm just asking the question. Is it wrong to ask the question, or to posit the theory? I will tell you this, my world was just rocked when I recently learned of the IMMENSE cumulative wealth held by American Jews, (it's actually quite amazing when you look at the Forbes 400 list and see that a HUGE, (like maybe 75%) percentage of American Jews are on that list) and learn how that wealth has been used to pay for political lobbying. That's just a fact, one can draw whatever conclusion they want from that. Oh, and by the way: why IS Israel the only country in the middle east that is allowed to have nuclear weapons? Oops, I'm sorry, I forgot. They don't "officially" have nuclear weapons. They just have their "wink, wink, nod, nod" nuclear arsenal.
My post was about her 2018 now infamous FB post she later removed, in which she suggested that California wildfires were caused by a "space solar generator" linked to the Rothschild family. I simply thought she was too crazy for Congress. We have enough crazies there already.
You can try fooling yourself that this is just about “questioning other country's governments motives”. But then you go and count wealthy Jews on the Forbes list! I can tell you one possible reason why Israel is “allowed” to have nuclear weapons: because Israeli do not scream “death to America” and do not burn American flags and effigies of American presidents in the streets. Iranians do. But you know that. Everyone does.
Thank you for your post. It helped me understand that the mental rot is much wider spread and much deeper than I thought when I posted about space lasers as a joke. It will also open eyes of many who still bury their heads in the sand about how much it is “rotten in the state of Denmark”.
As a man who used to follow Tucker, pay for his content, and root for his success, I can say with absolute certainty that I have not changed, Tucker has. He is now a tool for the same globalist parasites he used to rage against. Tucker has zero credibility and it’s really disappointing because he could have been a powerful force for good.
Ditto. Actually, Mega-dittos. I was also an admitted fan and defender of Tucker Carlson right up until about 2 or 3 months ago when I finally grew too weary of his abandonment of President Trump's courageous battle against the financially powerful Globalist Establishment and Tucker's (naive? calculated?) willingness to embrace narratives that were so painfully obvious as "MAGA-splitter" themes. Disgusted, I canceled my membership from his platform and stopped following him on X, besides not watching any of his interviews since then. He'll deny it profusely but he allowed his latent narcissism to rise and then dominate his entire approach and perspectives.
And I'm feeling exactly the same about Megyn Kelly.
Do either of them consider the consequences of Trump not doing what he does?
A nuclear Iran? A Kamala Harris or Gavin Newsom president?
Neither MK or TC seem to have ever heard the truism 'don't let perfect be the enemy of good'
I agree. The really sad part is that Megyn could have been a strong voice against the propaganda of the left, which is drowning out all of great accomplishments achieved by the Trump Administration over the past year.
My feelings exactly. She's a bit of a king maker and it's dangerous. She is creating RINOS instead of dedicated conservatives.
🎯🎯🎯
I was done finally with Megyn when she became the 24/7 Nancy Guthrie True Crime Channel. She's a click-baiter who comes from the mainstream "news" world where getting eyeballs is all that matters. Whatever you have to do to get them, that's what you do this week.
OMG!! me too. It was so damn boring. Good grief- a full two weeks of shows dedicated to all of that. Then she had Joe Kent on. Nope. I'm done. She finally did have Victor Davis Hanson on last week. He was gracious to do it.
Yeah, that’s the trajectory that killed it for me
Looks like a lot of us feel the same way. Megyn is going for cheap shoddy thrills, using her law degree to pretend she can tell crime stories like an insider, and alternate them with stupid girly fashion/gossip insider guests. I expect she's losing fans. I get that she doesn't approve of another Middle East war, but this one literally is the one that will end all of them. Iran has been stirring up the differences in the region for decades, and Trump is the only one who can unite them. Megyn is too impressed with herself.
That did me in too. It was a final straw, seemed desperate.
Megan Kelly is a rump swab for Tucker, My wife and I stopped listening on the morning drives to babysit the grand kids. Buh bye Megan.
It was how she and Tucker refused to condemn the horrific treatment of Ericka Kirk by Candace (along with Tucker featuring “brilliant” historians like Darryl Cooper who claimed Churchill was a war criminal) that lost both for me.
It is sad when such folks reveal their true motives as nothing more than $$, especially when both Tucker and Megyn were eager to ride the Trump train during the 2024 election, merely to bask in reflected glory. A type of stolen valor, actually.
Megyn Kelly baffles me. She seems so loyal to Tucker even though she is constantly saying she "has her own mind". She should know better. She finally had Victor Davis Hanson on this past week. That was a good move. I don't know why she went off the rails though. It's annoying.
I heard VDH on a Miranda Devine podcast and both briefly touched on how bizarrely Tucker and Megyn are behaving. Maybe Megyn heard that, idk.
That said, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. I’m done with both of them.
She acted like she had no clue that VDH has been respectfully critical of both Tucker and herself. VDH is always a gentleman. Even when he is critical.
I see Megyn somewhat differently. Tucker seems indifferent (if not insanely eager) to the GOP's potential loss of control at the midterms, while Megyn seems (justifiably, I would say) terrified of that happening, pointing to the schism that Trump's support of Israel has caused. The venom with which she says the words "Israel" and "Netanyahu" is pretty shocking. Both my wife (who Megyn helped leave the Left, for which I am forever grateful) and I have stopped listening to her very often (it used to be daily), ESPECIALLY on the "true-crime" Fridays. I'm guessing a lot of people have stopped, which may have been the reason for her having the refreshingly sane VDH on as a guest recently. On to Triggernometry!!
As well as principles over personalities. There are many who cannot put the founding principles over the current personality in the WH.
Same
War in Iran.
1000% sad to see all of these supposed lovers of the American way and American democracy suddenly pretend like we have lost our way because the only man left on earth able to stand up against the machine couldn’t be bought as easily as they were.
The “America First” crowd does not know history very well. They don’t understand that the huge problem with NGO fraud had its origins in the same idea.
When the Soviet Union collapsed, people were giddy about the supposed “peace dividend”. We could use that money to solve hunger, and homelessness, and give everyone health care. It will be great! And better yet, let’s give all that money to private charities, who will surely use it wisely to solve all our problems.
Forty years later, we are drowning in more of the same problems, along with unaccountable NGOs who have defrauded America on a scale earlier grifters couldn’t even dream of. Yet there are still those who believe we can use all of that money to solve America’s problems. Just give us the money!
Some people never learn.
The problem is unaccountable government giving taxpayer money (nothing they earned) to another class of unaccountable parasites, NGOs. When private wealth funds NGOs there is a somewhat better chance of accountability, though it is not assured. We know that from all the stupid billionaire trusts who funded BLM and NPLC among many other fraudulent "charities". People need to be more critical of where they give their money. Too many are corrupt and anti-American
It's easy to sit in your little cozy studio and yap but it's the big man, Superman President Trump who has the cojones to stand up against anyone and anything for the good of the future of this country and our grandchildren etal. I guess many people are just too stupid to understand there IS someone like that in this world unlike those (insert names) that have/do nothings like Biden and Harris etal. Not only sad; it's VERY scary for all of us.
One man IS the machine. Trump has pocketed billions since coming into office. He isn't a president so much as the Trump fam operate as a crime syndicate. He said himself yesterday... he doesn't care about the average american or cost of living. Look at what he's doing. starting a war to distract from the Epstein files. and focusing on a ball room, putting his face on the $100 bill, gold statues of himself, forcing his face into our passports... he is the epitome of the malignant narcissist & fooled his followers to think he's for 'draining the swamp' and fighting for the little guy.
Take your SSRIs because I know for a fact you’re on them, then dawdle on back to the cesspit you came from. I don’t tolerate TDS in any form.
Roger that!!👍🏼
Mega-dittos to that!
Love that we are still continuing on with Rush's mega dittos here and many other places!
Mega dittos!!!!
MAGA dittos.
Mega-dittos indeed!
Haha! Chatsworth Osborne Jr. has become the parody Rush used to tease him with.
I forgot that name Rush used for Tucker! Good memory!
Agree. The Iran conflict wasn’t the plot twist I was expecting but I’m very disappointed in those who sabotage our country.
Tom Friedman
Same
I also followed but never paid for his content.
Gave up on him end of 2025.
Unsure what happened in 2026, but I won't watch any Tucker videos.
Please don't watch any Tucker. We want to win.
That’s me as well and just don’t understand the total schism. I can understand being anti war and hurt by the appearance of a broken promise but Tucker has gone bonkers.
Seconded. Don’t forget that during Trump 1.0 Glenn Beck went around the bend, becoming a never-trumper but he came back around to sanity. Will it happen to TC? Who knows? Time will tell. I was with him all the way - actually haven’t watched FNC since they sandbagged him - until recently. Canceled my subscription. Don’t understand his reasoning; is Trump perfect? Not hardly! But you’re going to put faith in the stupid - STUPID - Republicans? The only thing they seem intent on doing is losing “gracefully”. We’re not on the field of Waterloo & it’s not 1815; The Marquess of Queensbury Rules don’t apply nor should they. This is a barroom brawl with the two sides lacking testosterone; one side suffers from it more than the other thankfully.
Why Tucker lost his way? Judging from his fixation on demons and such about a year and a half ago, I seriously think he's on something. He IS a recovering alcoholic; maybe he's found a new drug or something. No question that he's become unhinged.
How does he do it? I knew that he's got slippery techniques and is expert at it. There was an exchange in late 23 or 24 where an Aussie journalist came at him during a Q&A and he destroyed her; so he's a black belt, but just how does he do it? ....
Well, here's a fantastic analysis of just how these types (TC, Owens, Jones...) do it. It's incredibly powerful. It's about a half-hour and is worth its weight in gold.:
https://youtu.be/MYrvBO7gukE?si=x1a10H6v0TnU_rxX
There have been indications that he’s off the wagon, either with alcohol, and/or drugs. While I don’t want to fall into the trap of un-named sources, I have to give some credence to this theory, particularly because the source I heard it from is in the rehab community and has had lots and lots of experience in the addiction treatment world. And, one needs to consider his behavior. Tucker is doing a lot of damage to the MAGA movement and to the Republican Party as a whole, as are the individuals mentioned above.
Who is paying him to do this? We know all these issues boil down to, follow the money.
While follow the money won’t explain his motivation, I’m past giving a rats ass about his motivation. I do care about who is funding his “opinion”. So yes, FOLLOW THE MONEY!
Qatar
He recently said he's buying property in Doha. I'll bet he gets a bargain price!
In Tucker's case he doesn't need the money and isn't influenced by it.
I’m not so sure. Just last week I learned that Tucker has sued his stepsister for a share of her inheritance, even though the will excludes Tucker and his brother. Obviously, he has way more money than I do, but ironically, being rich has never stopped anyone from being endlessly greedy for more money.
That's CRAAAAAZZZZZYYYY!
99% of the world is influenced by money no matter how much they have. that is always the bottom line, the $$$$$$$$$
You can be off the wagon and still hold the same beliefs you held prior to your fall. This is a guy desperate for money. Who has likely fallen into some blackmail with the Arabs to boot.
Agree. Something is motivating him, whether it’s blackmail, money, MK Ultra, meh feelings hurt, whatever. Probably a combo. Either way, he doesn’t give a shit what he’s doing to the conservatives!
I don't think it's drugs. I think it's money... I think Qatar owns Tucker now.
Thanks for sharing that vid, it's a good one! I never heard of Jeremy Boreing before, but I already added him to my podcasts list. He did a great job of describing Tucker's tactics, but he didn't even mention that stupid fake laugh that Tucker uses... He uses it in such a condescending way, it has always pissed me off... even back I agreed with what he was saying.
The very crazy laugh jolts me in a very uncomfortable way and a big part of my disdain for him and his attempts at whatever schtick he's trying to ;pull off...I never did understand the excitement over him and just watched the interview by the woman journalist and it was like watching a horror movie.
Yeah Vicki, even back when I liked the angle he was pushing, I always hated that stupid fake laugh. It made me embarrassed before my own self to think that I somehow like this guy.. It's like he thinks he's talking to retards... He often uses it in an ass-kissing sychophantic way too, trying to encourage his guest to say more about whatever the topic is.
That ridiculous laugh is why I could never watch him for long when he was on FOX, and generally supported what he was saying. Oh my God, really?
You do realize that Pam Bondi had to register FARA working for Qatar, right?
Might want to check out evidence coming out that Epstein's legal team is suing Candace Owens for Bryan Harpole. Wonder what it means when Dillon is working for a foreign agent while keeping one of their principles in the US Attorney General's office.
Curiously all of these "off the rails" and "who's he paid by" types never want to confront his arguments. I'm 100% open to the idea that TC is wrong but his haters want to focus on everything but what he's addressing. Reminds me of when Matt Taibbi started calling out authoritarian/woke/censorship culture and he was met with a flood of "what happened to you?" critiques
You’re a one trick pony dude. Most of us have been following Tucker for a decade+. You’re just here because you hate Joos. Trite, bro. At least be honest about your bias.
Question; Is being against war with Iran "joo hatred"? Whats the inverse of that? That being anti-war is anti-joo? Are you suggesting that joos are innately war mongers? Sounds to me like you're the anti-semite bro. Implying that jews just support warfare innately. I'm confused.
You as a human support warfare innately. You might not understand that anymore because you can very nearly order Cheetos through “telepathy,” but to have gotten to that point required warfare.
It was never optional. There is no world where peace exists in which the only blood spilled was through your menstruations.
You stating you’re flatly against something doesn’t register as enlightened. Without any reasons given it sounds hollow and extremely gay af. Technically speaking.
Iran - by their own admission - has enriched uranium well past the point of fueling power plants. It’s weapons grade. Here’s some logic, nobody should want Iran to have a nuclear weapon because Iran will actually use a nuclear weapon. Why, do you suppose, none of Irans allies have ever sold them nukes? Or just given them a few like the BFFs they claim to be?
I’ll tell you why, because Iranian Islamist extremists (the regime) are fucking crazy. They don’t even operate on your deranged leftist frequency. They’re on another plane of existence where self-annihilation is a welcome reward.
Try answering my question before I indulge your "the only real world is one where blood is spilled through the sword" mentality.
By your logic I'm " technically gay"? LOL. Us Americans are not really into tribal blood feud, Are Iranians crazy? Wow. Prove it. Otherwise you're full of shit.
Which one do you need some edumication on, pal?
I would love to be educated on how Iran was a nuclear threat- according to Trump- despite the fact that Trump claims he "obliterated" their nuclear facilities. And that Tulsi Gabbard said Iran wasn't pursuing a nuke. And that Iran said there was a FATWA in Iran against nukes. Please, Help me understand why Iran is Evil!
I can understand not wanting war. It’s normal to have an aversion to war. But help you understand why Iran is evil?? What part of theocratic 7th century death cult mullahs don’t you understand?
Are you avoiding his question about Iran's proven lack of nuclear threat? Proven as by Trump's own words?
I'm pretty sure I'm wasting my time; however, I used to be a strong supporter of TC, pre Fuentes/WW 2 revisionism/ and, of course the demon dogs in his bed... So what's below is in hope of showing you a more coherent take than from some trust fund recovering alcoholic:
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been a leading public voice defending the U.S. strikes on Iran, framing them as necessary, preemptive, and limited in scope. His statements emphasize preventing Iran from ever acquiring nuclear weapons, degrading its conventional military capabilities (especially missiles that could shield a nuclear program), and protecting U.S. forces and allies.
Key Themes from Rubio's Statements (Early–Mid 2026)Preemptive Self-Defense and Timing:Rubio described the U.S. action as preemptive to protect American personnel. Intelligence showed Israel was preparing strikes, and Iran would likely retaliate against U.S. bases/forces. Acting first minimized U.S. casualties.
"Why now?": Diplomacy failed; Iran rejected offers for a peaceful nuclear program and was building a "conventional shield" (missiles, drones, navy) to deter intervention in its nuclear ambitions.
Core Objectives:Destroy Iran's ballistic missile production and launchers, navy, and air force capabilities. This prevents Iran from using conventional weapons to "hide behind" and pursue nuclear weapons unchecked.
"We’re going to destroy their navy, destroy their air force. We are going to basically destroy their ability to make missiles and drones... so they can never hide behind these things to get a nuclear weapon."
No ground troops needed; operations are on/ahead of schedule and achievable from the air.
Nuclear Red Line:"There is no way in the world that this terroristic regime was going to get nuclear weapons, not under Donald Trump's watch." Iran has repeatedly rejected peaceful nuclear energy deals and seeks weapons. A nuclear Iran under "radical Shia clerics with an apocalyptic vision" is unacceptable.
Any future deal must permanently prevent sprinting to a bomb. Rubio has signaled skepticism toward Iranian offers (e.g., on the Strait of Hormuz), calling the strait an international waterway and Iran's control an "economic nuclear weapon."
Broader Context:Rubio has noted the mission could reach a "finish line" in weeks (not months) and reiterated no regime change by U.S. ground forces—change should come from within Iran if at all.
He has pushed back on criticism, stressing clear objectives from day one and coordination with allies (while criticizing some NATO partners for limited support).
Rubio's messaging aligns closely with President Trump's but often provides more detailed policy explanations in press briefings, interviews (e.g., Fox News), and congressional appearances. He has consistently tied the operation to long-standing U.S. policy against Iranian nuclearization while expanding it to conventional threats. These positions reflect the administration's view that decisive action was required after years of sanctions, diplomacy, and prior limited strikes proved insufficient.
**********
Rubio has consistently and tirelessly explained the above.
Do you want me to now discuss how the regime's political foundation is an eschatological framework? And how neatly nukes and this orientation fit together in a terrifying manner?
Thats a lot of text without addressing any of the counter points I made. Is Tulsi Gabbard full of shit or not? Were the facilities "obliterated" or not?
Also it's not a good look to cite Rubio telling us that Israel was going to do whatever it wanted and we had to react lest US service members be killed. That sounds like a tail wagging the dog to anyone with a functioning brain.
Why did the Obama admin want to curtail Irans nuclear ambitions?
Sure would like to know how The One planned to curtail something he was helping fund ... with US taxpayer-sourced cash money.
Tucker defends Sharia law. That's not an "argument" I care to entertain.
I am watching it concurrently with this, so I agree you should also. https://www.facebook.com/share/18f2TKsyVb/
Uhhh... I clicked the link...what doe Iran's nukes have to to with defibs in PA?
Jeremy Boreing is conflating anti-Israel with anti-Semitism. That's the same slippery technique to shut down criticism of DEI ("racist"!), sexualizing / transing children ("--phobic!"), and wanting informed consent for medical decisions ("anti-science!").
When we can see what Isreal does, we don't need the influence of anyone else.
Pictures here - https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/here-is-what-is-happening-right-now-in-gaza?utm_source=publication-search
Raping prisoners is wrong. Raping prisoners with dogs is wrong. Donating obscene amounts to nearly Every US congressperson is wrong. Blowing up entire buildings is wrong. https://x.com/AlanRMacLeod/status/2049723243595280554 - Netanhayu posted this on his Twitter. Celebrating blowing up buildings.
And the problem is Tucker and Candace (and Baron Coleman, and others) noticing that this is actually demonic? No, the problem is doing the demonic things.
Exact same tactic as demonizing those who criticize trans surgeries for children.
Shooting children trying to get food when there is no "terrorist activity" within sight is wrong.
And conflating having a problem with all this - and that our taxes fund it - with hating all Jews, is a technique to shut down thought.
Um, why is blowing up entire buildings wrong when those buildings are harboring Hamas missiles which are aimed at your country?
Candace is the worst example you could use of any kind of moral arbiter. She did a sympathetic profile of predator Harvey Weinstein. She accuses Erika Kirk of being complicit in her own husband's assassination. She is odious.
I'm not joking when I say that I genuinely feel sorry for you.
Sasha, Tucker has become poisonous. Stop talking about him. We all used to watch and listen to him on CNN and Fox. He made sense at one time. Now he has a screw loose and is illogical and unreasoned. Like Candace Owens, he poisons his own well
Yup. Just think of all the amazing things that the Trump Administration has achieved (see Coffee & Covid Substack by Jeffery Childers) over the past year and Tucker could have been a loud voice standing against the left wing news media and their lies. A tragedy of epic proportions.
Agree!
Sasha should NOT apologize for posting his videos before. He had a reasonable voice that made a big difference and woke many sleeping people up. She is handling this right. When he stopped being reasonable and selfless he became toxic to this country. Both can be true for the time each happened.
I commend her for showcasing him and then seeing what she is now seeing and choosing to speak out against it.
I have NEVER been a fan of Tucker and I saw him in person speaking to a small gathering. To me he is just an annoyance and now he's sealed his fate for me. I am surprised at Megyn although her talk has gotten more crude for my taste. What's the point of that Candace Owens, period? Why are these people getting press?
Who is he really and where does he come from and what makes him an expert on anything? It's all a mystery to me...he talks to fast and that crazy laugh....I can't take him, never could. I don't get the fascination with him or Candace and those types.
If you listen to what they say instead of how they say it, you might be better equipped to call them out as the liars you see them as.
How does your ‘2 Minutes of Hate’ feel, VICKI?
As a true indication of his character. After following him for years and an annual subscriber, I sensed a change a few months ago. He became more shrill, more ego, so I complained. But having several months left on the subscription, he would not refund the balance. His is a voice for one thing. Money.
Same here.
I believe Tucker didn't change, it's just that now his mask has fallen.
There are obviously other forces at work here that he’s simping for the globalists — he has his bunker, he’ll be fine but the hellscape that we inhabit will only get worse and worse
We in California know this first hand
The assembly only worries about lining their pockets cheating to win elections
Carlson is telling the truth!
Exactly what truth is that?
Might be easier to address what you feel he is lying about. Please tell us where he is wrong. Just one thing. Maybe something he said talking with Huckabee?
I did the same. Paid, and now no more. Tucker has lost it.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1660685781911465/?fs=e&fs=e. What the heck happened … lost for words …
You won’t lose me, Sasha. As one of the people who suggested that you not platform him, I see you as that rare person in the media who will report what is true, as and when you see it.
Totally agree with you, JMAC. Sasha, you can count on us conservative, critical thinkers to continue following/subscribing. Even when we may not always agree, we loyalists won't pout and flounder out. We're in this together with you!
Totally agree with JMAC and Beth, you won't lose me Sasha. You write and voice what I'm thinking and feeling so well that I feel I know you and we’d be besties in RL.
Something has gone tragically wrong in Tucker’s brain—I can only sum it up to a personal vendetta against Trump and MAGA and I find it sad and stupid.
Sasha you’re right on about Tucker. I watched him nightly on Fox, followed him as a paid subscriber in order to support his new venture. The last interview I watched was with Mike Huckabee, even though I had unsubscribed last fall with his platforming of Fuentes & Ian Carroll. He seemed completely unhinged with Huckabee; he even did a 15 minute intro into that discussion attempting to sway viewers by controlling the narrative before given a chance to watch it. Tucker seemed to change, at least publicly, after his father’s death. One common thread with all these woke reich, now leftists, is their hatred for Israel & therefore Trump. Nobody with a functioning brain wants war, but with Iran it was necessary imo. Otherwise you end up with another nuclear power like N. Korea because you waited too long to deal with it. Though because Iran is controlled by a crazy Theocracy that hates Israel & the US, it makes them even more dangerous if armed. Just ask the other ME countries why they support Trump on this. Your instincts are spot on with Tucker & the rest of that group - all you have to recognize is who loves him now - the NY Times & other individuals & institutions with severe TDS & antisemitic discourse. I’d venture a guess most of your readers are savvy enough to recognize these changes & agree with you.
So glad to see I am not the only one to feel this way!
You are 💯 correct. Tucker has gone off the rails. He claims to be a Christian, but as you said, his rhetoric is likely to harm millions of average Americans who don’t have the nearly unlimited resources he has to shield himself and his family. Very narcissistic and childish behavior, IMHO.
Pastor Josh Howerton took on Carlson in a recent podcast showing just how much he does not understand Christianity. It was a gold level podcast. Carlson has become irrelevant. I have no idea who his followers are, but he is prepping for a fall from grace where they are concerned.
There was a wall of support for Tucker that held up far too long after he went off the rails. It started crumbling slowly and now quickly. Those of us with very high expectations for J.D. becoming our next President are hoping he will have the courage to take on Tucker as well.
So he's crashing now, is he!!!! If JD can take on "Martha," he's likely to take on Tuckee too! JD will be another remarkable president.
I expect Tucker to come full around and become a fascist progressive anytime now. He has shown he doesn't have a solid foundation at his core.
Isn't he already? All his enemies now are the same as for the Progressives. He is almost completely aligned with the Far Left. Megyn Kelly is headed the same direction as is Candace Owens. Glad for them. Let them join their totalitarian anti-American, Hamas and Iran-loving comrades
He may have already become a lefty and I'm just unaware of it.
JD’s misplaced loyalty to Tucker Qatarlson has really soured me on him. Now I’m hoping that the GOP can find someone else to run for president, with better looks/charisma (important, since we live in an ever more superficial society) and better values.
Rubio. And not for his good looks.
I could go with that.
IF JD blows it for himself, it will be Rubio. No doubt about that.
I watched the interview, it seemed to me that he is subtly trying to influence Vance to come out against Trump. None of us can say exactly where Vance’s head is in all of this but Tucker was definitely trying to hitch his wagon onto Vance’s. Surprisingly I don’t bought the NYT lady did an excellent job asking all the right questions politely and pushing back on his often vague or Kamala type answers.
His followers are pretty much those with TDS & hate for Israel.
Yes, I'd like to hear that interview very much.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoRXihmGg_M
Please note that it wasn’t an interview; Howerton did a great analysis of Carlson's own words.
Thank you, Mary Ann!
Thank you for sharing; I look forward to listening to the podcast.
Howerton isn't afraid of anything. He's also willing to talk about politics and sees that as part of his calling. As he often says, when good people (Christians )don't speak up, bad people (Satan) will fill the gap.
Thanks for the tip. Will look for this interview.
Howerton didn't interview Carlson, he reacted and analyzed him. Here's the entire podcast:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoRXihmGg_M
Thanks.
And he doesn’t know the Bible like he thinks he does. He twists books like Esther to fit his perspective & narrative that Israel has a history of genocide, by retelling half the story & deliberately taking it out of context. His ego is now being pumped up with talk of him running for President.
if you lose subscribers because you're willing to express your frustration with tucker, they weren't worth keeping. well, except for that money thing. ;) you're the best sasha!
Except for that money thing. 😂
Tucker is just an egomaniac who cares only about himself and money. He threw it all away. He has zero integrity and credibility. Who gives a damn what he thinks.
Unfortunately, many people do. That’s the rub. How does someone like Candace Owen have such a large following when all she does is spew hate and nonsense? There are a lot of gullible people around!
When I became awake around 2020 I really enjoyed Candace and Tucker. It saddens me to see where they have gotten to.
Same! Huge, huge disappointment!
The change has left me feeling sad, too… like losing a comrade in arms. I was incensed on his behalf when FOX dumped him - and in so underhand a way, the day following a disgusting hit piece by 60 Minutes timed so he wouldn’t have an opportunity to answer. Only two things really bugged me about Tucker’s show was that, at least initially, he had less-than-compelling guests; some just weren’t terribly bright. That, and his manner of breaking into forced laughter, a habit or tic that is off putting but not disastrous. A year ago I defended him vigorously to family members who had given up and believed his train had derailed, and I still feel strongly that he stood up for unpopular, but in my view true, perspectives and beliefs that society had all but disallowed. But now I struggle to see how I could have considered Tucker (and Candace, too) intelligent and brave, their “on-air personas” are so radically different today.
Candace has never been a draw for me
She’s nutty and everything is a conspiracy— !!
Me neither! She's a climber and was clear from the get go!
I've been watching some docs on Netflix on cults. I think I should have been a sociologist. There are so, so many who fall prey to the cultish mindset. In one doc of the twin sisters was pulled in and is still there. The nature and nurture of her life was the same as the twin, for all intents and purposes. So, these are people who love cult of conspiracy theories and theorists.
i hear you! unfortunately, these are the things that sell & get you the clicks in our world: hate & nonsense.
...and many of them are motivated, cause-driven voters.
Tucker is and always has been "the useful idiot". He and Hannity were nothing more than controlled opposition for the Pravda MSM media. Never forget his dad worked for the CIA. He is basically an MK Ultra Psyop.
BINGO, R H!
You don’t have to apologize for this war with Iran, Sasha. It’s easily the most justified, competent, efficient war effort of our lifetimes, and as far as competency and efficiency, in all of history.
Iran is London and London is behind every bad foreign policy muck of the past 3 centuries. Trump is the guy that is doing something about it, on MANY fronts.
I will plug Promethean Action for their brilliant reporting on this.
Rick,
Yes, Promethean Action has shown me angles I wasn’t aware of…
Today’s update.
Wow 😮.
https://www.prometheanaction.com/the-saturday-wrap-up-buried-the-trump-putin-agreement-the-media-completely-hid-may-2-2026/
Yup, I watch all of their videos.
Great analysis.
I love Promethean Action!
And also "escape key" here on Substack.
Absolutely correct.
What the US War Fighters are accomplishing is nothing short of truly amazing.
I completely agree with you, Sasha. I followed the same path as you. I’m in total disbelief about what Tucker is saying now. He has become a tool.
The good news is, I think his numbers are extremely low and people like you and me are much more in number.
Not so fast. I asked Grok was his numbers are today vs one year ago and it's 56M to 1M.
This is exactly why he's doing what he is doing. All for the $$. Greed and pride are two of the 7 deadly sins.
Yeah. I am very upset with Trump over his decision to launch the Iran War, but the idea that questionable move should prompt a complete rejection of Trump and his entire agenda is rather suspicious.. Something smells fishy to me... I think a rather large sum of money has changed hands.
Our new podcasting utopia, in which individual voices get to speak unhindered by unseen corporate masters, has crashed on the shores of ego and ambition.. It's not about "truth," it's about getting the clicks.. Everybody wants to be a YouTube star.. sigh...
Look up Promethean Action. I think they will help make the war make more sense to you. They put things in a historical context that is unique and revealing, at least it has been to me!
Truth be told, I'm pretty aware of the historical context of the Iran War, starting with the CIA overthrow of Mossadegh in 1953... Yes, Iran is a threat, no a full scale attack at this moment was not the answer.. But maybe Trump can stick the landing, fingers crossed.
Yes, but they tie it to the UK in ways that were new to me. Perhaps you are already aware, but I wasn't!
Yep, the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company convinced the CIA that Mossadegh was going Commie.. Hence, the overthrow of a democratically elected leader, replaced by a military guy who cosplayed as Shah. See, anti-semites, it isn't just Israel that manipulates US foreign policy, our other great ally GB has been doing it since at least the 1890s.
Finally remembered the title of a solid book on the US, GB and Iran in the early 50s: Mary Anne Heiss, Empire and Nationhood: The US, GB, and Iranian Oil, 1950-1954,
It was now or never. This was the best moment for a full scale attack. We saw what decades of leadership did with it at the expense of our pocketbooks. Trump only has four years to do what should have been done by all of them. He had to move fast. Frankly with him in the White House it was the perfect time.
And as far as anyone not in the room knows, they DID have intelligence of what Iran was doing to make future defense from them near impossible.
Some argue that Allen Dulles was behind this operation in Iran in 1953 in order to protect his oil friends because Mossadegh was going to Nationalize Iranian oil. Thoughts ?
That's pretty much what I think is the consensus understanding of what happened.
Thank you. There is so much propaganda on this subject that it’s difficult sometimes to find reality.
The great battle of civilization is between dysrationality (pathological irrationality) and rationality. The latter is a requirement for civilization. The former arises with entitlement. It also causes tribalism. It has killed every single civilization since Adam and Eve.
There are those on the left and right who are tribal (dysrational). Tucker is one.
Free will (SELF-control) is required to escape it.
And humility. I used to think he had that but the past year shows he is fresh out of it
And the irony is that this the exact thing TC would have wanted to discuss in the before days!
Majority of conservatives are tuning out Tucker, MTG, Owens and Jones. They have lost the plot big time.
The major problem is that you need more than a majority of conservatives if you intend to win the midterms. Thats why Trump was so great, he could energize other groups that nobody else could.
That's all over, of course.
All over...I don't bet against Trump.
Not sure last attempt posted. Right there with you Sasha for the reasons you articulate so well. And because I believe, the best is still ahead. Blessing!
Tucker - pffft. He’s the principled conservative bill Kristol, who has jettisoned every one of his conservative principles because he hates Trump so much, of the preening pontificating podcast world.
And does he still live in Maine? I thought he was a qatarian now. He’s chosen the mohammedan side. What a guy.
Nice alliteration!
“Preening” indeed.
Wholeheartedly support you on this Sasha. Tucker lost credibility with me a long time ago. God is bigger than anything or anyone. This interview is just one of the many demonic attacks on our republic. May 17th we are dedicating our nation back to God. The demons and trolls are out in full force. They are already defeated. Let's continue to stand together and with one voice for our nation and for President Trump.
Hear hear!
Chatsworth Osborne Jr is a grifter. Nothing less, nothing more.
There was a reason Rush didn’t designate him as his successor.
I about lost it when I learned his brother is named Buckley. Can you get more regal, Tucker and Buckley? I mean break out the ascots boys!
And Chatsworth's mother was always surprised when she examined currency. She would hold up a twenty dollar bill and say "Hmm... I didn't know they were still making money in such small denominations!" 😂
You forgot the part when Trump went live, and said he didn’t want us anymore: the portion of the MAGA movement who was against pedophilia, pro America first, for rebuilding America, before we start meddling and overseas affairs. Trump from the campaign Trail and whatever is going on in the Trump White House now bears no resemblance to each other. Our entire foreign policy revolves around Israel and seizing oilfield. The cost of living for everyday Americans to skyrocketed under Trump and he has trashed the Marjorie Taylor greens, Thomas Massey‘s, and many others who are true loyal supporters. As soon as someone disagrees with one word of what king Trump says we are slimy leftist traders Democrats in his warped mind.
Trump betrayed himself and America. That’s why Tucker et al. have Broken with him.
Completely agree, Joe.
You're not a slimy leftist trader Democrat, but you are a traitor.
Nope. You aren’t gonna get away with that. If I’m gonna get called names, I want the whole moniker.
It's amazing, isn't it? "Baby and the bath water". Clearly someone who wants to sink the ship.
Well said and the tip of the iceberg. Notable that the only resistance you face in replies is ad hominem. Also noteworthy how vast majority of comments here are turning into ad hominem.
What comes in coming days will only open minds in proportion to what minds will hear. Look forward to hearing from Candace Owens, Baron Coleman, DenksterIntel, BayesisBased, AllisonTopFiles, Lionel, ValhallaVFT and a growing list of youtubers in coming days.
Bryan Harpole just sued Owens for ruining his security career. As if letting his biggest customer die in front of the world did not wreck his career.
More important: turns out Harpole's attorney is Dillon. The same Dillon that has Trump's pick for #3 in Attorney General's office. The same Dillon that had Dershowitz, Ken Starr and others working for Epstein. The same Dillon working for registered foreign agents Israel.
If memory serves, this is Carlson's main issue with Trump. He is MakeIsraelGreatAgain not MAGA now.
Agreed. And if standing against wars in the Middle East is going to split the Republican party, so be it. It is likely something similiar may happen to the Democrats.
There is no "Wow" emoji offered, so I will just have to say "Wow!".
I would give it a thumbs down. The usual buzzwords are boring and unserious.
This is an interesting take on why the war is actually happening. I also recommend reading Escape Key on Substack.
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/the-imec-corridor-and-the-war-on?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=7caok
The 2 most important things on which Trump campaigned, and his most important achievements, are in the areas of immigration and energy. He closed the borders, and has forcibly deported or encouraged the self-deportation of large numbers of illegal immigrants, despite persistent opposition from activist judges and activist interference in and resistance to ICE. He has also reversed policies aimed at discouraging the extraction and use of oil and gas and displacing these energy sources with electricity generated using intermittent 'green' energy technologies such as solar and wind. Everywhere the latter energy technologies have been widely deployed (see Western Europe), the result has been skyrocketing electricity prices and less reliability electric grids. If you want to take your ball and go home because you didn't get what you wanted in other areas, you will deserve what you get -- open borders and expensive and unreliable energy. You will also get more crime, more DEI, more gender ideology, and so forth. One more thing -- Trump shut down USAID. Good riddance.
There is no evidence that Epstein was a pedophile. The definition of a pedophile is an adult who is sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children. None of the women who claim to have been Epstein 'survivors' fit this profile. None of the teenage girls who gave Epstein 'sexual massages' were kidnapped or otherwise forced to come to his home. No, they went to his home voluntarily because their girlfriends told them Epstein would pay them $200 each for a massage. The youtube channel Soft White Underbelly has interviewed several of these self-proclaimed teenage 'victims,' and they all acknowledged going to Epstein's home because they wanted to make a quick buck. I'm not sympathetic with their stories. The idea that some organized pedophile rape ring plays some significant role in the US political system is a baseless conspiracy theory peddled by internet shysters to losers.
Influencers who oppose Trump's foreign policy in Iran, Venezuela or elsewhere fall into 2 categories: morons and traitors. The morons are people who believe that if we focus exclusively on domestic problems, the rest of the world will live us in peace. That's not the way the world works. It's the same as believing that the schoolyard bully will leave you alone if you leave him alone. Sorry, no. Once in a while you have to use 'hard power', i.e. kick some ass, to send the message 'don't eff with us.' You have to demonstrate that your military is powerful and effective. Message delivered in Venezuela and Iran. The traitors are those who believe in and support the idea of a multipolar world -- that the world would be better off if other world powers, especially China and Russia, displaced the United States as the leading superpower, or that the United States should share power to a greater extent with these other world powers. Tucker seems to be firmly in the traitor camp. MTG appears to be just a moron, but you never know. Her net worth certainly went up sharply during her stint in Congress.
But you go ahead, sit in your basement listening to conspiracy-peddling influencers, and stew about pedophiles or the Mossad blackmailing US politicians. Wack away.
Great post. glad to see someone pointing out basic real life common sense facts.
You are out there, way out there, but, whatever.
You probably can’t stick your head much further in the sand that it already is, and I don’t even know if it’s possible to extract at this point, but if you gave even a cursory view to the tiny little bit that Was released from the Epstein documents, there are thousands and thousands of references to sexual acts with children well beneath the 17 year old Age range that you are claiming
Are all these claims credible?
Probably not. But, one of the signature promises of the Trump campaign was that everything was going to be released come what made. That hasn’t happened. As more than one person‘s pointed out, if there’s nothing to hide, why the tens of thousands of redactions? Just answer that one question please why redact something that doesn’t exist. There are dozens and dozens of women who have gone on the record over and over again saying that they were trafficked and they weren’t 17 years old.
Just answer that one question please why redact something that doesn’t exist. There are dozens and dozens of women who have gone on the record over and over again saying that they were trafficked and they weren’t 17 years old.
Regardless of whether you think Trump‘s foreign policies is good or not, it stands in direct contradiction to what he promised over and over and over and over again. Trump 2.0 is a complete betrayal of what he promised. Maybe you think that’s a good thing, but it doesn’t change the fact that he lied and he continued to lie and his sabotaging a few good patriots left in this country like Thomas Massey and Marjorie Taylor Greene.
You’re calling anyone who actually stands at the American constitution a traitor says a lot about where your true true loyalties lie. Trade her to whom? Trader to Israel, Israel? Yes Tucker and I in many hundreds of thousands of other people are definitely treasonous if you think our loyalty should lie with those scumbags and Tel Aviv. But we are not traders to our own country. Many of us have worn the uniforms and been sent overseas on these bullshit missions for bullshit special interest. So just fess up and put in your bio where your loyalty is truly lie. It sure as hell isn’t with America. I have a sneaking suspicion. You would vote for Netanyahu for president if you could.
If you think the age at which girls reach puberty is 17, you are more of a moron than your rant suggests. Michael Tracey has looked at the available records, and he found no evidence of 'thousands and thousands of references to sexual acts with children.' According to Tracey, the tens of thousands of redactions were made at the request of the shyster lawyers working (i.e. chalking up big bucks in lawyers' fees) working on behalf of the so-called survivors, and the redactions were implemented to protect their identities. A 14 year old girl is not a child. The word 'trafficked' implies that someone was physically kidnapped or otherwise forced to participate in some sexual act with Epstein, and there is no evidence of that type of activity. If you are 14 years old and you go to Epstein's house because you were told that you can earn $200 for giving him a massage, don't pretend that you are a victim of sexual abuse if he asks you engage in some additional sexual acts. By the time a girl is 14, she should know better than to put herself in the position of being alone with an adult male, or even a boy her age, if she doesn't want to engage in sexual acts with him.
Trump didn't promise over and over again not to use military intervention against Iran. During his first administration, he retracted Obama's deal on nuclear enrichment with Iran, and he ordered the assassination of Iranian military officer Soleimani. You have only yourself to blame if you are too stupid to read Trump correctly. See Michael Tracey on Trump's views on Iran.
MTG is a whore, and Massey is just another demagogue politician trying to exploit the fog surrounding Epstein, in collaboration with lefty Ro Kanna, who is one of the politicians responsible for the destruction of California. And I think it stinks that he married a former congressional staffer (of Rand Paul) only 16 months after his first wife's death. Maybe that's why Massie is so interested in the Epstein thing -- he wants to distract the attention of gullible fools like you from all the hanky panky he and other Congressman are engaging in with the whores who staff congress. You know what they say about sex and politics.
I disagree with your thesis about Tucker, but would never unsubscribe because I happen to disagree with you on this. During these very rocky times among conservatives, I love reading and listening to people on the other side of this issue, to see if I am missing something in my own analyses and positions. I listen to his podcasts and I listen to Tucker's guests, and I do my own research through source documents or listening to other podcasters' guests (who, TRUE, may also have the same "bent", have been in government or research or some other "insider" information), and I tend to agree with his analyses and his positions. I really don't think he is a shill or is out for vengeance against Fox or anyone by telling lies - after all, the best vengeance is to be proven CORRECT! I DO agree with you that Tucker's openness about what he thinks is happening with Trump, TPUSA, the MAGA movement, etc. is harmful to our unity and our ability to maintain the House and Senate in the midterms. Personally, I can agree with Tucker, et al., and set that aside to know that we have a binary choice in our elections (at least for now) and as sure as God made little green apples, the Democrats are the existentially worse choice. Hands down. However, I would love to see more Marjorie Taylor Greene- and Thomas Massie-like Republicans running for office.
Completely agree and wish we could clone Massie and MTG.
As a Jew controlling space lasers, I respectfully disagree about cloning MTG.
What’s the point about you controlling space lasers? Seems like an implied threat. Is that what you intended? Why else mention it?
If you believe MTG’s antisemitic fantasies, feel free to interpret it as a treat LOL.
Personally, I don't think MTG is anti-Semitic. I think questioning other country's governments motives is healthy - we criticize other nations without being called anti-name the country. Why is Israel exempt from that criticism or questioning? We ABSOLUTELY criticize and actually demonize (maybe not all of us, but I will speak for myself and many of my likeminded friends) Islam, which I guess makes me Islamophobic, but in the U.S., that Islamophobia seems to be celebrated. After all, isn't that why we are at war with Iran?????? I know, I know, the current acceptable government trope is that we are at war with Iran because they have (which they didn't) nuclear weapons, but we all know the truth: we are at war with Iran because we have been indoctrinated into believing that all Palestinians and all Iranians and all Lebanese are supporting Muslim extremists and they send their proxy terrorists to destroy Israel. Perhaps, it has been the other way around for the last 40 or so years? I don't know, I'm just asking the question. Is it wrong to ask the question, or to posit the theory? I will tell you this, my world was just rocked when I recently learned of the IMMENSE cumulative wealth held by American Jews, (it's actually quite amazing when you look at the Forbes 400 list and see that a HUGE, (like maybe 75%) percentage of American Jews are on that list) and learn how that wealth has been used to pay for political lobbying. That's just a fact, one can draw whatever conclusion they want from that. Oh, and by the way: why IS Israel the only country in the middle east that is allowed to have nuclear weapons? Oops, I'm sorry, I forgot. They don't "officially" have nuclear weapons. They just have their "wink, wink, nod, nod" nuclear arsenal.
Of course, you don’t think MTG is antisemitic!
My post was about her 2018 now infamous FB post she later removed, in which she suggested that California wildfires were caused by a "space solar generator" linked to the Rothschild family. I simply thought she was too crazy for Congress. We have enough crazies there already.
You can try fooling yourself that this is just about “questioning other country's governments motives”. But then you go and count wealthy Jews on the Forbes list! I can tell you one possible reason why Israel is “allowed” to have nuclear weapons: because Israeli do not scream “death to America” and do not burn American flags and effigies of American presidents in the streets. Iranians do. But you know that. Everyone does.
Thank you for your post. It helped me understand that the mental rot is much wider spread and much deeper than I thought when I posted about space lasers as a joke. It will also open eyes of many who still bury their heads in the sand about how much it is “rotten in the state of Denmark”.