100 Comments
User's avatar
Chris Nathan's avatar

Thanks for posting, Sasha. I rarely read/browse Twitter so it's very helpful to get these updates, and you have a talent for highlighting what really matters.

Expand full comment
David Merrifield's avatar

Democrats are too insane to pull back. They’ll kill themselves and try to take everyone with them. The Democrat Party is quickly becoming the American Nazi Party.

Expand full comment
D Parker's avatar

So far, we’ve documented over 40 commonalties between the Democrat and Nazi party, so you be the judge. It’s why we’re calling them the communazi left.

Expand full comment
David Merrifield's avatar

It really makes me reconsider the difference between the right and left. Nazi ideology fits well with democrat pseudo-morality.

Expand full comment
D Parker's avatar

In certain basic respects - a totalitarian state structure, a single party, a leader, a secret police, a hatred of political, cultural and intellectual freedom - fascism and communism are clearly more like each other than they are like anything in between.

Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., Associate Professor of History at Harvard New York Times Magazine, Sunday, April 4, 1948

https://web.archive.org/web/20190111175417/https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/00/11/26/specials/schlesinger-centermag.html

Expand full comment
Dutchmn007's avatar

Nazism/Fascism & Communism are different only by degrees; under Communism the State owns & dictates the means of production & distribution. Under Fascism the state leaves production & distribution nominally in private hands yet dictates the means of production & outcome. China - anymore - is a fascist state rather than communist. They were Communist until they decided they liked money (thanks in large part to Richard Nixon & HW Bush) so they allowed corporations to come in & set up shop. The corporations have to play the govt game otherwise the heads are deposed & bought men are installed. Benito Mussolini - the founder of Fascism - was a former communist & described fascism thus: “fascism is the melding of corporate & political power.”

Now here in the U.S. which party is in bed with Big Tech/Big Defense/Big Pharma?

Uh-huh. Now you get it. ;<)

Expand full comment
D Parker's avatar

Economist, and President of Argentina noted that ‘there are no major differences’ in the collectivist variants in his speech before the WEF in Davos:

Argentina President Javier Milei slams elites at Davos: 'the state is the problem'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DYQQf1KjYo

Jan 17, 2024 #wef2024 #davos #javiermilei

Argentina President Javier Milei Promotes Freedom at Davos 2024 (Full Speech)

https://rumble.com/v47k4in-argentina-president-javier-milei-promotes-freedom-at-davos-2024-full-speech.html

“This is how we come to the point where, by using different names or guises, a good deal of the generally accepted political offers in most Western countries are collectivist variants. Whether they proclaim to be openly communists, fascists, Nazis, socialists, social Democrats, nationalists, socialists, Democrat Christians or Christian Democrats, neo-Keynesians, progressive, populists, nationalists or globalists. At bottom, there are no major differences. They all say that the state should steer all aspects of the lives of individuals. They all defend a model contrary to that one which led humanity to the most spectacular progress in its history.”

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

When the ends justify the ends is a group is peoples justification start questioning the morality of it.

Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

This is a truly mangled sentence that makes no sense. There should be a law against doing this to the English language. You’re just torturing our beautiful language right here in public view for all the world to see. This is simply awful. How could you post such an atrocity!?

Expand full comment
D Parker's avatar

She just confirmed that was just an attempt to blame both sides.

Sadly, she can’t accept that it’s the communazi left that is the author of that kind of abject immorality.

Look back through history, it’s the left that confiscates guns, suppresses free speech, locks people up in concentration camps and stacks corpses like cordwood.

Who said the following: "I appeal to the chemists to discover a humane gas that will kill instantly and painlessly. In short - a gentlemanly gas deadly by all means, but humane, not cruel."

Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

I think it’s a male and I think he’s a regular who often posted in the past using different names. The mangled grammar and the “both sides bad” constant claim are very familiar.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

The point is people justify cruelty and BS when it benefits them in the end. Both parties do it today and please dont deny it.

Expand full comment
D Parker's avatar

Only one side LIED about Biden's condition - The Left.

Do you Communazis ever tell the truth about anything?

Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

“dont” is not a word.

Expand full comment
Matt L.'s avatar

We will find out for sure if they are insane on July 11th. That is now the next watershed moment. Sasha, I believe we entered climax stage of this 4th Turning Crisis and it may continue into next several years.

Expand full comment
D Parker's avatar

All for something they’re having difficulty describing.

Expand full comment
Faith's avatar

Sooooooo, what do we do about that?

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

Blaming the staff, as the Biden family seems to be doing is going to produce leaks. First one is already on the street. Biden is only mentally functional from 1000 to 1600. Anyone who has dealt with dementia suffers knows this is sundowning.

Expand full comment
Susan G's avatar

Thanks for the tweets, as I am not on X. Just read (in the NY Sun) that the DNC is considering nominating Biden now, rather than the nomination already planned for later this month to achieve Biden ballot access in Ohio. They think a nomination now will end all discussion of replacing Biden on the ticket. I am speechless, but not surprised.

Expand full comment
Chris Nathan's avatar

I always used to wonder at the self-delusion of the Soviet commissars. I don't wonder any more.

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

The plan is to invent a Time Machine and then travel back at least a decade to before Joe started to lose it and then record a Time Fake video where Joe talks about the 2024 election and sounds mostly OK because it is 2006 Joe speaking. The rest of the plan just follows logically from there…

Expand full comment
Chris Nathan's avatar

I find it hard to believe that Judge Merchan would be so reckless as to sentence Trump - a 78 year old first time non-violent felon - to actual jail time. The move would assure Trump's election and discredit the US judicial system across the globe for a generation or more.

The prospect makes me think of Talleyrand's great comment: "It would be worse than a crime; it would be a mistake."

Expand full comment
ElJefeCabron's avatar

How often, over the past 8 years, have you found yourself saying to yourself “I have a hard time believing they will go THAT far”? You may consider preparing for all outcomes.

Expand full comment
Faith's avatar

They'll put him in jail for 10 days so he misses the convention to humiliate him - or try too, they hate him that much for which I question their sanity to hate ANYONE that much....it's a small amount of time for a first time offender they'll say,

Expand full comment
Chris Nathan's avatar

Perhaps. I can see it happening. But even so: a mistake. Trump in chains is an image that will delight his enemies, outrage his fans, and at the same time wake up the sleepy agnostics who say things like: “I want a President I can be proud of.” It will suddenly be obvious to them that “I want a country I can be proud of” is more important than whether their president is vulgar, uses orange tanning lotion, once said something mean about Rosie O’Donnell etc. Americans do not jail their political opponents over criminal charges so ambiguous that no one - possibly even the jury - even knows what the crime was.

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

Adams, Lincoln and Wilson did in fact jail their political opponents. The charges were clearer but the precedent is there.

Expand full comment
Chris Nathan's avatar

I knew Adams had because of the famous "Alien and Sedition Acts". I wasn't aware of Lincoln and Wilson. I looked up Wilson and learned about Eugene Debs' jailing in 1918 - Sedition Act again! Interestingly, President Harding commuted Debs' sentence about three years later, suggesting that for at least some people the entire thing reeked of tyranny. Thanks for the correction!

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

Couple of Congresscritters were prosecuted during CW1. Not sure if they were actually imprisoned though I think at least one was exiled.

Expand full comment
Susan Vonder Heide's avatar

It would, of course, not make rational sense, but people with TDS are not known for their rational sense.

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

Often attributed to Talleyrand but it was probably Joseph Fourche, the head of Napoleon's secret police.

The US judicial system is already discredited so what do they have to lose.

Expand full comment
Chris Nathan's avatar

"Convicted" is not the same as "imprisoned." It makes a difference.

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

On the surface, they are acting as if “he had a bad day” is going to hold and everything will reset to pre debate status quo ante.

I cannot see them just going back as if nothing happened. There have to be demands for cognition tests, for the audio from SC, for some kind of transparency. This issue does not go away as long as Joe is alive.

If whoever is making the decisions had complete control we’d have resolved this already. The fact it is lingering tells me they were hoping to avoid it coming to this and don’t really have a plan B that is without risk to the plotters.

Expand full comment
Mac's avatar

The clock is ticking and I must say its probably picked a bit after Brandon went live today for 4 minutes reading from a telepromter, bad mouthing the Supreme Court and then without hesitation saying...end qoute.

Somebody better get a broom and dust pan to sweep this mess up... he's finished.

Expand full comment
Liz LaSorte's avatar

Why would we be surprised that Obama and Co. would throw Biden under the bus? A lot of democrats suffer from cognitive dissonance. They can’t separate the fact that their party, that used to represent the little guy, is corrupt and has been for a long time. The GOP was always represented as the rich douche nozzle who cares only about money and even making money as a war profiteer.

But, the reality that we have an “uniparty” and they are both parties corrupt (and making big $$ on our dime) is sinking in now. And, then comes Donald Trump. Plato said, “Those who speak the truth will be hated.” Is Trump the Gray Champion that Howe and Strauss predicted would save the day?

Expand full comment
HAVUK's avatar

Biden isn’t that much more afflicted by dementia than he was in the first debate. The difference is the Dems are willing to get rid of him now that Republicans are gaining traction, that the bogus Trump charges are failing, that people don’t trust media. Thanks to X and Musk we have one way to communicate truth. And now there’s Rumble and Substack.

Expand full comment
Ben Dandebairen's avatar

the debate was the little boy who said out loud he was naked. everyone who kept saying what great beautiful clothes he was wearing, and yes, that includes my man Gavin and my man Ro, were lying. 'but at least he's not a lying braggart' is not a relevant argument. Also, since now Joe adds he has a 6 handicap, that part is not even true anymore either. He IS a liar as well as senile.

Expand full comment
Faith's avatar

Yes he's a liar and had to leave the 1988 race because he lied, how quickly people forget, if they even knew ....

Expand full comment
Sally DiMartino's avatar

Not only has he been caught plagiarizing twice, but they were from speeches that were familiar to alot of people - one was (I think) RFK, and the other was a British PM. So he's actually a not-to-bright plagiarer.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

You mean echo chamber nothing different than what Democrats do with MSM

Expand full comment
HAVUK's avatar

When every single media source halts free speech to suit their agenda, all while refusing open discourse, it's not media. X allows for free speech as does Rumble. Try that on Reddit and you'll be banned or at the very least shadow banned. It may seem like an echo chamber but when it's the only place to post honest opinions without being called names you will find it loaded with those whose voices were shut down every where else.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

Yep... Twitter users dont call you names and shut you down... yep...

Expand full comment
HAVUK's avatar

If they call you names, big deal. On other sites it’s not allowed, not reported, or shadow banned. Call me names, it’s what free speech is all about but banning is censorship. Like the Hunter Biden laptop, I tried posting on Reddit and got kicked off. We now know it was real.

Expand full comment
Heyjude's avatar

Always falling back on the “both sides do it” argument is not a lot different from an echo chamber. It is just a circular cul-de-sac with no way out. How does that help anything?

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

Because if the shoe fits it works. The very fact is we have a hyper partisan echo chamber party who are willing to overlook their BS to win.

Expand full comment
Faith's avatar

Sh*t! I trust Tucker. His podcast with Jeffrey Sachs about a month ago was unbelienvably revealing about how our gov't is playing games with the world and our lives with their constant war mongering because "they can". I highly suggest you watch it, all who haven't.

These tweets are telling. God bless Tucker and Sasha and ALL of the honest brokers out there.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

The problem of Tucker is only honest when it benefits his ideology.

Expand full comment
Faith's avatar

Actually that's not true either.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

Really? His comments on democrats after the midterms showed a different take and he only puts on fringe democrats that only want to trash the party what a shock.

Expand full comment
Faith's avatar

Not sure what he said about Dems after the midterms, though I do know he only puts people on that interest him and who he respects.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

Which is ironically only when they praise his ideology stances

Expand full comment
Danimal28's avatar

Biden was done years ago; voters rejected him soundly twice before. He has always been 'off'.

I can't believe I am posting a 2020 video of Biden yelling at union workers from Cenk, but..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUaphcsb3Os

Expand full comment
Kate Cahill's avatar

Thanks for the video clip-he's such an a-hole!!

Expand full comment
Kate Cahill's avatar

Thanks for these you-tube clips! A good reminder that the people who voted him in because he was a "sweet old grandfather" and would be a "calming influence" on our nation- were TOTALLY delusional!!

Expand full comment
Danimal28's avatar

Your welcome and I could post several more. The guy has been a lying, cantankerous, segregationist ass his entire life.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Holm's avatar

Yes I agree. Saying it's totally up to Biden is nuts. Biden was clearly chosen by the power brokers behind the scenes in 2020, when it looked like Bernie would win. Those same people can remove him, whether he agrees to go along quietly or not.

Expand full comment
D Parker's avatar

The communazi left seems bent on provoking something.

Expand full comment
Sherri Sager's avatar

Bill O’Reilly said the same thing yesterday on Glenn Beck.

I’ve read so much the last few days that I can’t remember where I read it and I have no idea if it’s even true but, I read that money raised by Joe can’t go to someone else that people that donated donated to him. I also read that several states, I think it was 3 won’t allow the candidate to be switched on the ballot after the primary process except by death of the candidate or the 25th Amendment. I wonder, if true if this will make a difference.

Jill doesn’t want to give up her power.

Expand full comment
John Bates's avatar

"Otherwise you risk destroying the system completely and forever".

That's the point. I'm surprised Tucker doesn't see it.

Expand full comment
heidi's avatar

A hilarious crack at cackling kamala, God forbid we end up with that useless donkey in charge, excellent 1 min video; "Join us as we delve into the fascinating evolution of the North American “cackling dingus” in the swamps of our nation’s capital. Despite possessing a so-called “Room Temperature IQ,” this remarkable creature may transcend traditional ranks and even ascend to the highest office in the world. Watch as we explore how this “diversity hire” could astonishingly be entrusted with the “Nuclear football.” Narrated in the iconic style of David Attenborough, this journey uncovers the extraordinary potential of the cackling dingus. ~

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsScXI57yRI&t=6s

Expand full comment
Orenv's avatar

It makes a lot of sense for Biden to resign and Kamala take over. If he isn’t fit to run, nor stand trial, how is he fit to continue?

Expand full comment