45 Comments
User's avatar
Mark Marshall's avatar

The beginning of the video gets right to the problem. We are not just giving the okay to use our missiles; we practically have to launch them ourselves. Putin can say with some justification that it is the U. S. directly attacking Russia. This is a reckless escalation!

Expand full comment
AncientViking's avatar

Which is why it was done--this almost green lighting Russia to retaliate. It is so far beyond reckless, I can't even find the words to describe it. All so they can hand Team Trump a shitshow...

Expand full comment
Dena's avatar

Yep - we have to give them the coordinates. Otherwise they hit apartment buildings.

Expand full comment
Marilyn F's avatar

I love all of Tucker’s interviews, but there’s nothing better than Tucker & Greenwald together. And this was the best one yet.

Thanks again for featuring all of Tucker’s interviews.

I suggest people also watch Tucker interviewing Russ Vought (Trumps last & hopefully next OMB director). He’s a very thoughtful conservative, who explains our budget problems in an understandable & interesting way. He’s had 4 years to formulate solutions. I anticipate his ability to finally get things done

https://x.com/tuckercarlson/status/1858640384643002751?s=46

Expand full comment
AncientViking's avatar

Yes--that interview with Russ was great. Not only does he know volumes--he knows how to separate what is needed and necessary from all the noise.

Expand full comment
Dena's avatar

Vought was officially named OMB Director Friday. It was an eyeopening interview, you’ll learn the importance of the OMB & how the deep state bullies the ones in charge.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Holm's avatar

They're discussing the nuclear threat. And yeah it's crazy how flippant people are about it. The people who will say that Putin is basically Hitler and is a power mad dictator seeking to conquer Europe will then turn around and act like there's no worries about him using a nuke. Trust in his restraint. It's a completely schizophrenic position.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

We should immediately stop poking the Russian bear at the behest of Ukraine, Zelensky and his bankers.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Holm's avatar

I think we're doing it out of self interest, imperialism and because we're maybe a little bit afraid of China.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

I think both parties have deranged views on Putin and its not clear cut on either spectrum.

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

The bigger problem is if Putin EVER uses a nuke we will be obligated to respond even if it is Ukraine and not a NATO country. We are the counter to Russia with nukes. Everything in Europe is ours. Any use of nuke force by Russia will quickly escalate into a global nuclear holocaust.

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

No we aren't. We should act in our national interest, period.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

I agree with you. As an aside, it seems others still believe in General Jack D. Ripper’s remit to protect our precious bodily fluids.

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

Our precious bodily fluids would be OK. It's Zelensky's precious bodily fluids that create the problem.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

With Allie’s like him, who needs enemies

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

Pretty much the same for every head of government in NATO except Orban.

Expand full comment
D Parker's avatar

Just imagine where we would be if Communazi Kamala had won?

Joe Biden's handlers would not only have lit the fuse for WWIII, but they would have been cheering on nuclear destruction.

How's that for "Saving the planet"?

Look up the subject of nuclear winter and see how that would square with 'being green.'

Expand full comment
kristin's avatar

So aggravating listening to people fear monger world war 3. The only reason that I can see that we are even involved was that our Gov needed a place and excuse to funnel all kinds of money over to Ukraine and then right back into their greedy hands. They don't give a shit about Vlad or Ukraine. Just another grandiose scene created to siphon money for themselves. I cannot see any other reason for this bizarre Ukrainian situation.

Expand full comment
D Parker's avatar

This is how you know the fascists of the far-left are complete frauds.

They keep on the drum beat of proof by repetition in calling President-elect Trump 'Hitler' and all manner of pejoratives, when he wants to do the opposite of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei collectivists.

Specifically, dismantling the deep state and limiting government – this is how you know they are consummate liars.

Expand full comment
DavidK's avatar

Russia could launch a nuclear warhead at Martha's Vineyard and this would stop, I suppose.

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

Very unpopular to be a truth-teller today. I remember when the mob was assassinating journalists who were ratting them out in the mid-70s, including Don Bolles here in Phoenix. This is no better and maybe worse since it is nationwide and not just a few individuals.

Expand full comment
Amr Marzouk's avatar

A good and interesting combo. Amr Australia

Expand full comment
Carl Fasbinder's avatar

Hoping that all investigators will spend full time determining who is making these provocative decisions and exposing them. There’s no way it can be Biden. Appear to be the same intelligence agencies which are being implicated in the assassination of President Kennedy.

Expand full comment
K Barrera's avatar

Isn’t the interest in Ukraine due to the fact that the Sorrros - influenced Deep State had made Ukraine something like their headquarters? The objective, I think, was to bring down Russia to allow the WEF to bring in the NWO? I haven’t heard the whole interview yet, so maybe that will come up.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

Greenwald is fantastic

Expand full comment
Andras Boros-Kazai's avatar

Greenwald was an established professional who moved to South America and there (after ingesting whatever substance?) chose a 19-year-old Communist thug to be his "spouse."

This makes the provocative chats he dispenses . . . just . . . funny.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

He has integrity and courage.

Expand full comment
Roberta L's avatar

Not if he defends the ‘wrong’ side. If so, he must be called out as a drug-addled, communist, gay pedophile - which is major admirable if you defend the ‘right’ side - which is ‘Left.’ Got it?

Makes perfect sense to me.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

I really don’t know about his sex life; I would not defend a pedophile though. I hope he is not one.

Expand full comment
Roberta L's avatar

If his "spouse" is 19, he is legally a consenting adult. But the liberals will grasp at any straw to take down the enemy, even those that are celebrated among themselves.

Expand full comment
Andras Boros-Kazai's avatar

Greenwald may be "celebrated" as an entertainer.

But never as a serious commentator.

What possesses you, Tucker, to keep inviting this chatter-box?

Expand full comment
Half's avatar

That's why we need to build a base on mars so when the nuclear winter comes Trump can catch a Space X special to Mars and escape the holocaust. Only Trump and the biggest donors will make that flight.

Expand full comment
Luke's avatar

Thanks for posting. We’re in trouble. We need a coup NOW, bloody or not!

Expand full comment
AncientViking's avatar

Great interview. I would say the most important thing for Team Trump to immediately, right away do: Unleash our energy and start selling it to Europe and bankrupt Russia. Two problems: 1.) We may not have enough time to get this going, as we have been slow-walking into this mess in a way that most are now completely unaware of the danger. 2.) We're kind of bankrupt ourselves.

I suspect we are too far down the road, given the utter destructive nature (especially last few days) of the present administration. This has been done intentionally...

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

Agree about energy but Russia does not need to be our enemy. They are Christians and as good or better than many of our so called Allie’s.

Expand full comment
AncientViking's avatar

Yes, they do not 'need' to be our enemy--but, given their form of authoritarian govt, it makes them antithetical to what we are ostensibly supposed to be as Representative Republic--thus a natural enemy. Now--they abandon that way of governing, they can decouple from having that relationship. It's big ask.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

Their form is no worse than what Democrats just did for 8 years of lawfare, impeachments, J6 show trials, CIA assassinations, FBI infiltration and turning of innocent civilians, youth castrations and mandatory injections. Let’s fix our own house before thinking we’re better than Russia or other foreign countries.

Expand full comment
AncientViking's avatar

I don't deny those bad things you mention. But, as the saying goes: two wrongs don't make a right. Where we diverge, is I believe in American exceptionalism. Assuming it is not being polluted by the those things you mention. This is why we need to fully unleash Team Trump and do some serious house cleaning--to what has become a very dirty house...

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

Meanwhile, the UK is going big into non-crime hate incidents, imprisoning dissidents and attacking farming. The French are ignoring elections. Both of them and the Poles are beating the war drums which means we fight the Russians. Germany is working up to just ban the AfD.

Expand full comment