155 Comments
User's avatar
Jacquie's avatar

Niki Haley is a Rino

Expand full comment
Danimal28's avatar

Tucka is right, she is a democrat. Just like W, Cheney, Powell, McCain, Grahamnesty, Cornyn, McConnell, Pauly Ryan, Dan Crenshaw, et al. The globalism never ends except in all of their bank accounts.

Expand full comment
LudicrousLife's avatar

Don’t forget the Bushes

Expand full comment
Danimal28's avatar

Absolutely, our current status is directly related to the Bush family going all the way back to Prescott doing 'business' with the Nazi's in the 1930's. I would point out that democrat Walter Duranty of the 'Newspaper of Record' was equally at fault like FDR. The UniParty.

Expand full comment
D Parker's avatar

A few million Kulaks are unavailable for comment on that observation.

Expand full comment
Jacquie's avatar

George HD Bush

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

Damn, that’s an accurate but scary list of Darth Vader spawn right there.

Expand full comment
Danimal28's avatar

Right?! Creepy at best. Now... Think about the thousands of 'appointees' of theirs who are actually adminstering our demise...

Expand full comment
Benjamin Holm's avatar

Yep she does not fit in with the new Republican Party. She wasn't the only one but most of the others have dropped out, beside Christie. I don't get how her poll numbers are that high. I would vote for Trump, Desantis or Vivek but would not ever vote for Haley. I'd vote RFK over her.

Expand full comment
Lex Rex, Esq.'s avatar

RINO. You keep saying that word. I don’t think that word Mac’s what you think it means.

That’s too long a list of major republicans to think Republicans (as a party) are anything else than warmongering globalists

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 4, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Danimal28's avatar

What is the record of presidents joining or starting wars? Wilson? LBJ? Truman? FDR? Clinton? I would argue that G W Bush and his father were never republicans in that they grew government more than almost any others.

Perhaps neo liberal is a better term for the Bush era 'republicans'.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 4, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Danimal28's avatar

Really? The national debt hasn't gone down over the last 100 years. Socially? 'Republicans' have caved for decades, hell, Mike DeWine just vetoed legislation banning medical transtesticle crap until people were 18.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 4, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
D Parker's avatar

Worse than a RINO – if that’s possible.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

Nikki the warmongering neocon.

Expand full comment
D Parker's avatar

It was enough for me when she wanted everyone to be properly identified to comment online.

Expand full comment
Matt L.'s avatar

Agreed. That said I don’t like any politician saying something is ‘crystal clear’ as Vivek does in the Tucker interview. I happen to agree w/ Vivek on Haley, but to me it’s not yet ‘crystal clear’ she is the lone surrogate for the anti-Populist donor/establishment class. That Newsome-DeSantis only debate happened for a reason? What if the play is actually to soil Haley (her words are god-awful to Trump populists so not too hard) and then Vivek has better shot at outright R nomination if Trump gets disqualified.

Expand full comment
james's avatar

Like all neocons she has no policy position other than attacking Israel's enemies. War with Iran. All of the other issues are secondary, and she just reverts to the dominant worldview. Open borders good, diversity good, massive public spending good, keynesian economics good, etc.

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

And RINO = retardican.

Expand full comment
jh's avatar

and ant-historic American demographic ! Racial, ethnic, religious bias against European people. Wants massive third world immigration to continue; our great replacement , just like Brandon.

Expand full comment
richard cunningham's avatar

Although Vivek has pretty low numbers, his message is fantastic. I think he an Pres. Trump would make the best team ever.

Expand full comment
David Glassman's avatar

how bout we assume he’s already on Team Trump

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 4, 2024
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

He’s not a proxy for anyone. The values he talks about are values he deeply believes in. He sees our society disintegrating and it horrifies him and he’s committed to doing what he can to stop it.

Expand full comment
Beeswax's avatar

I agree. He’s unique, and very intelligent.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

Seva has been all in for Vivek all year.

Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

My favorite by far. No one hits harder than Vivek. I see him as our champion of traditional values and meritocracy. Lena says Putin will emphasize traditional values and family values this year. I like Putin too. He supports traditional values and has no interest in globalism. That’s why the democrats hate him. He’s going to gain a lot of global support for BRICS though with that.

“BRICS Massive Expansion: Russia Is Chair In 2024, New Strategic Members, Focus Areas For New Year.” (9 min)

Lena Petrova. Jan 2, 2024

https://youtu.be/0W_ihJeZkhY?si=Ms1qjj5HjRtMoXMX

Expand full comment
Kristin's avatar

Vivek is awesome. But only one, quick, smart talking man.

I love to Love Vivek.

Just doesn’t seem to settle right.

Here we go.

Kickin it up a notch. Election Season.

Expand full comment
Kristin's avatar

Also. He’s given us all so much. Just by participating in this race for President.

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

They're already a team. Vivek clearly operates as a surrogate for Trump. He's not running for president; he's running for a senate seat out of Ohio or a cabinet position. I think this is obvious.

Expand full comment
Matt L.'s avatar

It’s not obvious to me. That is one possibility (that he’s a Trump surrogate). The other is Trump is for one reason or another not in the race (crooked justice system, not allowed on swing state ballots, or dies). In this event, Vivek is situated to gobble up the Populist vote himself. Vivek, IMO, is setting up as Populist choice #1 after Trump passes away, whenever that happens. Trump is getting older, he’s 77 now. Many of us have experience w/ our friend/family when they hit their 80’s.

Expand full comment
Thoughtful Reader's avatar

I think that Trump dying is fairly likely - but not because he's 77 years old... TDS afflicted will literally stop at nothing. If the extraordinary banana republic tactics to keep him off the ballots don't stop him, something else will. We are well past anything like a society of laws.

Expand full comment
R H's avatar

Nailed it. The deep/administrative/unelected/global cabal/etc. can under NO circumstances allow Trump to serve 4 years as President. Their very survival depends on it.

Expand full comment
Burnt taco's avatar

Hence they prop up Haley as a hedge against the dems tripping over old Joe’s dick

Expand full comment
james's avatar

I'd watch out for him. He's saying a lot of things that are endearing him to the 'right', but look at his history. Something doesn't add up. His success was far too easy for someone with relatively weak credentials in a scientific field. (A BSc in biology barely qualifies you to clean up a laboratory, it certainly doesn't get you to research level).

Expand full comment
RonJ's avatar

I disagree. I don’t think he is a poser or a plant. I think he is something we are not used to: intelligent.

Expand full comment
Danimal28's avatar

"Vivek smacking around the media is the greatest thing ever."

No kidding. No kidding.

For about 30 years now I have marveled at how pusillanimous republicans have been toward the 'media'. And then you see either the fear or outright cowardice when the media accuses them of all the fake stuff they repeat until people accept it. Or blackmail...

When Trump pointed at them and said "You are fake news!" our fists raised in joy. It is so obvious I am amazed and kind of creeped out folks can't or won't see it.

Expand full comment
Thoth's avatar

I know. Did you see Biden's Christmas message? Think of all the work that went into it. The script writers. The teleprompers. Wardrobe. Gaffers.

And after watching it what do we know? Dear leader likes pasta and oh yeah, ice cream.

But the country is terribly in debt. Who got the money? Why didn't I get any? Questions left unanswered.

Expand full comment
Danimal28's avatar

He is going back to Philly to deliver another communist 'democracy is under attack by MAGA republicans' with the two Marines bathed in red lighting like Sept 2022...

Expand full comment
GabeReal's avatar

That was so atrocious! I can’t believe anyone supported him after that. But I shouldn’t be surprised, all my liberal Bay Area friends/family didn’t even notice...

Expand full comment
Stan's avatar

Did you see trump’s Christmas message - the rot in hell one?

Expand full comment
Thoth's avatar

I don't see Trump's messages because I'm a busy guy. But rot in hell is my favorite.

Expand full comment
Jacquie's avatar

You didn’t get any money because you didn’t launder money for Biden , PELOSI, Kerry, the Mormon guy.

Expand full comment
Kurt's avatar

Vivek knocked the ball out of the park!

Out of sight!

Out of orbit!

Out of the solar system!

Vivek for President!

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

Now that I've heard him at least mention vaccine injury, I trust him a lot more. Before that, I didn't trust him at all.

Expand full comment
james's avatar

Be careful, it's an easy ploy to lend support to someone because they share one or two major concerns. I think he's questionable. Simply look at where he went to school, his business connections for his rather suspicious startup, etc. He was surrounded by left-liberals and his success is curious, to say the least.

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

Right, anyone who suddenly got very rich in pharma should be suspect. But at least he finally mentioned jab problems.

Now that I think about it, maybe he's the real reason for my latest ban from Twitter, because I every chance I got I would reply to any Tweet of Vivek's asking why he never talks about the millions of deaths from the jab.

Expand full comment
james's avatar

Interesting, you could be on to something. However, it might be an automated ban by Twitter itself.

My suspicion about him is that he is a mere BSc in biology. I've worked around a lot of people in biotech, and a BSc is considered barely above a janitor. To have any cred in biotech you need a PhD, even an MSc won't cut it. Even the project managers at the big Pharma firms have PhDs in many cases.

And yes, he went to Yale. That's nice. I've been around a lot of patent lawyers who do pharma work. Any patent lawyer in biotech who is under 35 almost HAS to have a PhD.

In short, his credentials would be highly questionable in the Pharma/Biotech world, yet he managed to succeed and become rich. Extremely suspect.

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

Once Vivek himself mentioned that for all we know, the Federal Reserve could be crediting the bank accounts of certain people or businesses for political reasons.

Maybe he slipped up there and told a truth he isn't supposed to.

Expand full comment
Stephen Flanagan's avatar

Vivek is one incredible breath of fresh air. America could use him at the helm. Why is it that in order to run for office you have to be able to qualify for "The Villages"

Expand full comment
John Bates's avatar

I love Tucker, but I cannot believe he thinks "Joe Biden" will lose. Not after the blatant steal of 2020. Or has he (and so many others) forgotten about the truckloads of ballots at 3 am? Or the ballot counts moving backwards for Trump?

Structurally, very little has changed, and not only has no one been held accountable for the numerous irregularities of 2020, those who have protested have been thrown into the DC Gulag. The media and 90+% of the GOP tell us 2020 was the fairest, most secure election in our history. What will stop them from running the same playbook?

Until that can be answered, I will never believe for a second Trump can win. I pray he does, but it will indeed take Divine intervention for it to happen.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth's avatar

It will take us to mobilize and stand up to election officials who think they can tweak and change voting procedures at the last minute. We need to volunteer to be poll watchers, election clerks and deputy registrars on Election Day. We need to expose shenanigans on the spot. We didn’t question all of the voting irregularities because we were told they were emergency measures due to the “so called pandemic. Our elections should be fair and we should never cede our voting rights again. We need to be bold and stand like vultures in every polling place in the country. Stay strong John and don’t lose hope.

Expand full comment
Matt L.'s avatar

In many 2nd & 3rd world nations, voting is only done, in person. Your thumb is also dipped in ink when voting and ink remains for over 72 hours, to help prevent cheating by voting 2x, or vote by the dead.

https://tricitytimes-online.com/2020/12/23/25-countries-mark-voters-with-ink/

We should consider the same in USA. Without this we will remain ever fractured as a nation, and distrustful of results, because 1/2 of us won’t trust ‘who is doing the counting’. We should also require ID at voting booth.

These are Populist ideas. And therefore not supported by our Uniparty Establishment. Ask yourself where you stand on this?

Expand full comment
Jim Lane's avatar

Dead people won’t miss their thumbs. Apparently they vote. 👍🏻

Expand full comment
james's avatar

"Without this we will remain ever fractured as a nation"

Hate to lecture, but the USA is not a 'nation'. A nation is a group of people who share language, culture, and common descent. That's why the various Native American tribes call themselves Nations. That's why the Jewish people use the term 'nation'.

The USA is now a multicultural mess like Brazil or India. It is not a nation state. You complain about it being 'fractured', but that's what you get with multicultural societies. Lee Kuan Yew (the founder of Singapore) said it best when he said that people organize politically by race and religion.

Expand full comment
Jacquie's avatar

I agree. We must demand voter ID and paper ballots. Be poll watchers.

Expand full comment
Stan's avatar

Preach sister.

Expand full comment
Susan G's avatar

I agree 100%. Joe Biden isn't worried. Those worried Democrats, like Axelrod, are putting on a show. The infrastructure built with Zuckbucks and progressive 503(c)s is only stronger. And now they added lawfare.

The Red Wave of 2022 didn't happen, and Trump 47 won't happen.

Expand full comment
Stan's avatar

Abortion and trump craziness and all it entails (from the d side, so you can imagine) and the undeniably booming economy and all the bills passed vs the the current R controlled house which is accomplishing nothing, and god knows what else (trumps criminal behavior exposed and shockin?)… will help dems.

Expand full comment
Stan's avatar

Why were these “truck loads of ballots” not evidence in court to elicit a win”?

Expand full comment
Matt L.'s avatar

Stan, to me the primary reason for J6 and shouts of a ‘rigged election’ was due to the massive change to mail in voting that occurred in 2020 vs. previous elections. Almost doubled the amount of mail in for 2020 vs. ‘18 & ‘16. You can see Pew Research article here:

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/10/13/mail-in-voting-became-much-more-common-in-2020-primaries-as-covid-19-spread/

Mail in vote for ‘CV safety’ means also mail in vote COUNT also performed under ‘CV safety’. This is why we all went to bed on ‘20 election night w/ Trump ahead, based on votes cast in person that day and therefore counted in near real time. But we awoke the next AM to Biden ahead after mail in votes counted. There is lack of trust in near 1/2 population of this country that the 2020 COUNT was done fairly, and without corruption, especially in swing states. State executive administrations usurped State Constitutional power that belonged to the legislatures - and unilaterally changed from in person and over to mail in vote under guise of its ‘for CV safety’. This change opens up greater potential for cheating. Our SCOTUS at the time abdicated their authority by not intervening (most notably Pennsylvania) and allowing this to continue.

Expand full comment
Stan's avatar

Yeah, but that has all been explained. AND… I checked stats awhile back and mail in were used similarly in R and D winning states. So unless it made it easier for dems to vote who otherwise weren’t motivated to travel to vote, it’s still a valid vote. Mails obviously required some time to be tallied and we were told which states counted these later in the process and generally speaking, would increase Biden’s counts once counted. We were also told that trump would use this delay in tallying to show he won, then didn’t. So…? Pls tell me you didn’t fall for the bs…

Expand full comment
Matt L.'s avatar

Stan, the point is that no explanation will convince 1/2 the country the mail in vote wasn’t ginned up. You or others can say it’s been ‘explained’ until you’re blue in the face, but 1/2 the voters don’t accept/believe the explanation.

How do you feel about allowing several days for voting, but it must all be done in-person?

I personally feel our country is lost until there is again trust in the vote & count. IMO, we have to go back to old school voting procedures, in order for our country to move forward. Without this, civil war/disobedience is our likely future.

Expand full comment
Stan's avatar

I’m ok with mail in voting if it’s accessible. Maybe fox and trump should pay for the added cost of in-person voting since they’ve undermined the trust in the alternative. But there are sufficient checks and balances with mail in voting to make it secure. Because trump lost because of it, he told his cult members not to trust it, even though he used it previously. Did he not care then? Lol!

You maga apologists…

Expand full comment
Matt L.'s avatar

I think Trump told his supporters not to use (mail in vote) because of concerns over how the COUNT would be done (behind closed door, and at a ‘CV safe’ distance from each partisan observer). While in-person vote is auto tabulated in real time, and not behind closed door. That’s my take.

Expand full comment
Thoth's avatar

We liv in a bribe-ocracy.

Expand full comment
Danimal28's avatar

Sorry to double up on comments, but...

What if... In 1998(or so) a republican looked at a reporter and said "You are soooo full of shit." and then backed it up like Vivek just did, and Trump before him? Think we would have had two 20 year wars? What if a democrat or republican looked at Bush and his team and said "You are sooo full of shit on this Patriot Act; it will eventually be used against the 'other party' not to mention the most important group of all - The People? You?

You think we would be here now? On the verge of chaos due to 10 million illegals invading our cities right now among other major problems.

Expand full comment
Thoth's avatar

Everything is a boat. What's important about boats is balance. If you go back in history it's a study in balance. You have to balance stupid, dumb slaves and peasants with the elite to get honorable mention in the chronicles.

So you cam see it now. With the university system we have a surfeit of elites. Biden attempts to create ballast with desparate open border chaos.

Expand full comment
Stan's avatar

Why isn’t the r controlled house doing anything to solve the poroblem? Answer… they want it to look bad to help trump. It’s all such bull shit.

Expand full comment
Matt L.'s avatar

Do you know what the Uniparty is? That is why shit doesn’t get done. All talk, little action to help the common man/woman.

Expand full comment
Danimal28's avatar

Exactly, the UniParty loves cheap labor and control of the population. There are only a handful of republicans and maybe two democrats who support this country and their oath.

Expand full comment
Matt L.'s avatar

Yes, Danimal. And those handful of minority voices in both D and R parties are often vilified and otherwise made out to be unhinged to discredit them. There is also an unusual overlap between non-congressional voices who expose the Truth and those voices then being publicly accused of 'he said/she said' rape, pedophilia, or other charge. The Establishment propaganda organ is really good at creating caricatures and villains for those that step outside the 'control' narrative.

Expand full comment
Ruth H's avatar

Vivek is spot on describing the neocons and military industrial complex all in for Haley. They can prop her up and fund her campaign, but she’s disliked by many and won’t win in her own accord. The election will be fraught with every fraud they hood to pull off, but we must overcome and prevail. Trump 2024🇺🇸

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

Buckle up, Ruth. Gonna be bumpy ride.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

Vivek is so intelligent and articulate. We need him engaged. And he clearly explained how Nikki Haley is funded and controlled by the NYC Globalist Elites as he mentioned like Larry Fink, Hoffmann, Jamie Diamond and others like Bill Ackerman. Scary times that they have put Nikki as a Trojan Horse in the Republican Party.

Expand full comment
Stephen Flanagan's avatar

Ms. Randhawa is cut from the same mold as "Dubya", Obama and the Docile Mannequin that presently occupies in name only the Oval Office. All are supreme war mongers that do not care for the "great unwashed" in their own country, just their neocon buddies and the military industrial complex that has greatly damaged America. Hey, Nikki, give me a break about Putin, what total hogwash. As dumb as George W. and Sleepy Joe are, she has the IQ of a dehydrated house plant, The woman would be most dangerous if she ever got the keys for 1600 Penn. Ave.

Expand full comment
Gusdad's avatar

Actually, she is very smart. Cunning may be an apt description of her.

Expand full comment
Marsha's avatar

This guy hits the nail on the head with his take on the MEDIA. All they do is LIE. And Nikki .....spot on! Keep her the hell away from DC!

Expand full comment
Thoth's avatar

They're (the media) not your friends. Why would they do anything but lie to you maliciously? People get this idea in their head that they need to be informed and then they reach out for a pill with a three or more recently four letter acronym. I shouldn't say it but I will. It's the human condition. Actually AI said it for me, as it happened. Cheers.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

Ahoy; that was more clear than your previous comment.

Expand full comment
Thoth's avatar

In two party system powerful oligarchs put eggs both baskets.

-Confucious

Expand full comment
Ruth H's avatar

Thank you for posting these. Always appreciated.

Expand full comment
David Glassman's avatar

she is, in a word... disgusting, always has been🤮

Expand full comment
Thoth's avatar

Natural born veep.

Expand full comment
Robert  Ferguson's avatar

I never trusted Nikki but I didn't know she said this. Now I really don't trust her

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

I find it bewildering that Tucker conflates neoliberalism in a market sense, comprised of free markets, minimal government intervention in the economy, and reduced regulations, to contemporary liberal ideology. Democrats by design want more governmental control over markets, redistributive tax policies, and increased public expenditures, which contrasts significantly with the tenets of neoliberalism. I find it misleading how he conflates the two.

Expand full comment
GabeReal's avatar

Yeah I noticed that too, and it had me SMH. But I also disagree with your take on neoliberalism, it’s a hideous policy that has led to much of our country’s problems.

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

I didn't offer my perspective on the efficacy of neoliberalism, I just offered an observation pertaining Tucker's use of the term. Also, while being more market-oriented than the rest of the West, the United States functions as a mixed economy, not a fundamentally neoliberal one.

Expand full comment
GabeReal's avatar

Ok I may have misinterpreted, I thought you were approving of neoliberalism.

Expand full comment