111 Comments
User's avatar
Sasha Stone's avatar

That was a great speech. He said everything. It was so good.

Expand full comment
Suzie's avatar

He didn’t technically “drop out”.

He suspended his campaign and will remain in the ballot in select states where his name can presumably do more damage to Harris than Trump.

But he most definitely endorsed Trump and basically accepted a position in his administration when he wins.

It was an excellent speech - one of the best.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

The point is he is not trying to win anymore. That’s why he didn’t drop out of all states, solely to help Trump and hurt Harris. He’s been very strategic with all of this, right down to his timing.

Expand full comment
Texyz's avatar

Amen to the timing. RIGHT after DNC Convention, and JUST in time for this weeks Sunday shows....

Bwahahaha. Bury the Dem-twits!

Expand full comment
Messenger17's avatar

A long game move. Setting things up to win when it is possible, and create the conditions for victory, which would be imperiled by a Harris selection (sic) victory.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

His entire election was hurting the democrats 2024 in some ways I think even he knew he was a prop for Trump.

Expand full comment
Pacificus's avatar

HL3, had the Dems had an honest, open primary, RFK might have won, and even had he lost, almost certainly would have supported the Dem nominee. But, like in 2016 and 2020, they had a rigged primary instead designed to stifle, not heed, the will of the people. The consequence of that evil act is a de-facto Trump-RFK unity party.

Come out of the echo chamber you inhabit and get educated.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

So why the money from GOP during the primary you're doing dirty moves while crying foul.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

HL3, I was donating to both campaigns!! Even during the primaries. 🤣🤣 And there was no sneaky dirty moves about it. Lol I was torn. I loved both of them for very different reasons and was undecided even though I am a certified republican! People can donate based on wanting to help someone be able to be heard, to help it be a fairer race where the really good candidates have a chance. Any GOP donation would have been done in that spirit.

Expand full comment
Ben Dandebairen's avatar

I'm glad he did not drop out, so I can still vote for him In California.

Expand full comment
Dena's avatar

He won’t be on the ballot in the battleground states.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

So like his DNC primary where he was funded by GOP MAGA donors?

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

See my reply to you above

Expand full comment
Dena's avatar

Awesome speech. Interesting how the networks, CNN, MSNBC all cut away as he went after the Democratic Party- censored him just as he charged in his speech.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

Yep. They still don’t want America to hear the truth because they are complicit in the deception of the American people.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

Awesome how he laughed when he was pointing out how even after the judge recently found in his favor over the censorship, just two days later Facebook still attached warning labels to an online petition calling ABC to include him in the upcoming debate. He laughed as he said “they said that violates their community standards, um … <laughs>” 🤣

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

I LOVE how much he hits on the censorship. That alone should give Democrats something to think about.

Expand full comment
Thoughtful Reader's avatar

Democrats don’t *think* about anything. They’re not allowed. They reflect received feelings, they don’t think. The party that’s held the presidency (and much of the Congress and the media) for 12 of the past 16 years can’t really allow much independent thought. They demand unquestioned obedience and message parroting, or they’re shunned, sued, silenced and stopped. Even listening to RFK is a disloyalty, let alone considering what he says. They hate whom they’re told to hate, believe what they’re told to believe, vote for whom they’re told to vote, they repeat the words they’re told to trust, they feel the feelings they’re told to feel.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

Dems depend on local/state/federal government 24/7 for everything from cradle to grave. Should call them Dependsocrats

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

Love that. Dependocrats!

Expand full comment
David White's avatar

One freedom that Demos certainly do not believe in is freedom of speech.

There seem to be only two freedoms that Demos believe in these days: freedom to have 9-month abortions, and freedom (for non-Whites) to "migrate".

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

Free speech as long as I agree with it to be honest that is what our media system has "evolved" into.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

He gave the most lucid explanation about the war in Ukraine that anyone has ever given all year. And he was right.

The sad part is unless the American people seek out to watch this interview uninterrupted they will never hear it. And they NEED to hear it. MSM kept switching over to “expert” guests and putting RFK silently in the background so you couldn’t hear him, or switching to Trump then did the same thing to Trump! Even Fox News did this. They STILL don’t want America to hear the truth. Get a link to the video from RSBN and share it with everyone you know, explaining it is unedited and necessary to hear.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

You mean the same truth he tried to hide GOP support during the Democrat primaries they were right to boot him out and fast.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

🤣 🤣 omg, you’re like a dog with a hollow bone that has no marrow. Easy to walk away from and get bored with. Bye

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

Truth hurts when it goes against your echo chamber

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

🤣🤣 I have no pain my dear. I DO have truth though. And I sleep like a baby.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

Truth only when it benefits you

Expand full comment
Messenger17's avatar

Brilliant chess move. The knight sacrifing himself to trap the opposition (of liberty and health) queen and set up the checkmate.

Expand full comment
GabeReal's avatar

“Nothing would be more glorious than if he is the one who ends up losing the election for the Democrats.”

Wouldn’t that be something! Talk about Social Justice!

Expand full comment
Paul Scofield's avatar

And then have Trump appoint him to head the CIA. Talk about exploding Deep State heads.

Expand full comment
GabeReal's avatar

Word!

Expand full comment
Greg's avatar

And, as Jason Whitlock suggested, both JFK Jr and Trump becoming assassination targets for said CIA.

Expand full comment
Paul Scofield's avatar

Yeah, I heard that, as well.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

Uhh, it’s not “become” when they’ve already taken several shots at your head.

Expand full comment
D Parker's avatar

Shouldn’t this tell everyone that the true threat to our Constitutional Republic is the Un-Democratic party and the National Socialist Media?

Expand full comment
Claudia's avatar

God bless RFK Jr for using his platform to address the elephant in the room, and offering to help Trump make the changes needed.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

I have goosebumps. Watching it now. So happy

Expand full comment
Texyz's avatar

Am I wrong, or did he give that entire amazing speech without a teleprompter ??

Expand full comment
Connect The Dots's avatar

He's the only one who knows how to speak clearly and eloquently for long periods of times. No filler, no sensationalism, no mudslinging… He stays on point and puts his heart into it

Expand full comment
Connect The Dots's avatar

The only one of the candidates I should clarify

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

He did have teleprompters. But he’s just really good at only needing them to stay on point. He doesn’t read nonstop from them. He refers to them yes, but he knows his content well enough to use them the way they were meant to be used before the Mickey Mouse club turned politics into theater.

Expand full comment
Texyz's avatar

Just a lucid, smart mind, and exact opposite of the idiot Kamala.

Expand full comment
Art's avatar

Stunning. Informed and intelligent, the polar opposite of what the vacuousness that the Harris campaign has delivered. Every American should watch that speech, unfiltered by the corporate media who spin everything into their narrative of lies.

Expand full comment
Thoughtful Reader's avatar

Democrats aren’t allowed to watch anything like that.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

RFK Jr. just filed paperwork in Pennsylvania asking that his name be taken off the ballot and endorsed President Trump in writing.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13773619/robert-f-kennedy-trump-endorsement-drop-presidential-race.html

Expand full comment
D Parker's avatar

Okay, so who’s ready for a few years of plain, refreshing SANITY!

Where we don’t have to be on a freaking roller coaster of emotion, and we can just live our lives in peace?

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

We still need to remain vigilant and vote.

Expand full comment
D Parker's avatar

Yes, we do.

And we get EVERYONE we can out to vote with us.

Because the lesson we’ve learned is that keeping leftist insanity at bay means eternal vigilance.

Expand full comment
Esaite's avatar

The best speech of the week. Far more genuine, principled and consistent than so much of the BS we heard at the DNC. He's a patriot.

Expand full comment
Pacificus's avatar

Yes, RFK's remarks had an unmistakable air of authenticity about them. The Dems are crapping bricks right about now.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

Well said.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

RFKJr speaking about Harris, “Instead of showing us her substance and character, the DNC and its media organs engineered a surge of popularity for VP Harris based upon …uhh, well, nothing!”

He says no policy, no debates, no interviews, only smoke and mirrors, and balloons at a Chicago circus. Who needs a policy when you have Trump to hate?

Love it

Expand full comment
Pacificus's avatar

"Who needs a policy when you have Trump to hate?" Maybe the best line of RFK's speech.

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

The Democrats were like a flock of starlings all changing direction at the same time.

Expand full comment
Thoughtful Reader's avatar

Perfect analogy.

Expand full comment
Eccentrik's avatar

people have their beef with each man, which is totally understandable

but I can't help but see this as a win-win for the Medical Freedom community (or whatever you wanna call it)

will the TRUTH of "vaccines" finally get the greater spotlight it's always needed?

https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/trump-rfk-jr-and-vaccines-its-complicated

Expand full comment
Dena's avatar

Interesting that it was Callie Means, who Tucker recently had on his podcast with sister Casey, who got RFK & Trump to meet.

Expand full comment
Chana's avatar

Excellent address. I loved it. I was very likely going to vote for him because… California.

I’ve been an independent all my life and voted third-party almost all the time

RFK is the first that had a chance and is someone I could actually get behind.

It’s very interesting that the Means helped implement this. Bravo.

Expand full comment
JudyC's avatar

Absolutely brilliant and courageous! One of the most compelling speeches I’ve ever heard!

Expand full comment
Cynicon Implant's avatar

He's removing his name from the ballots of the battleground states so that he doesn't draw votes away from Trump in those states. No mention of a position in the Trump cabinet if Trump wins. Seems kind of a middle ground move but should improve Trump's chances a bit.

Expand full comment
Mista B's avatar

This coming on the heels of that report that RFK hit up the Kamaladingdong campaign for an endorsement in exchange for a cabinet position. I think one of these two things are true- that report was a complete fabrication that incensed him so much that he decided to stick it to the them as much as he could, or perhaps there was some truth in it, and he felt betrayed by the leak of that report. I was seriously expecting him to bleed off some votes for the dems, that Israel/Gaza situation is alienating many dem voters who are probably not going to vote for either candidate due to their positions on that issue not being that far apart. It's hard to imagine who that crowd will vote for now if anyone without RFK running who's position was much closer to the activist position.

Expand full comment
Thoughtful Reader's avatar

The Dems were never worried about RFK bleeding votes - their voters do as they’re told. Every one of the pro-Palestine protestors will vote for whomever the DNC party tells them to that week, regardless of the hysteria on the streets.

Expand full comment
GabeReal's avatar

The hardcore ones will vote for Stein, as I mentioned above.

Expand full comment
Mista B's avatar

I really wonder about that. I know the mainstream dems will walk in lockstep, but I'm not so sure about the activist fringe. I've been following certain far left voices for years, not because I like them, but because I like to keep a window open to that particular information bubble. Anna Kasparian and Cenk Uyghur seem like they've turned their back on the party. They'll never vote right, but I'm really curious to see if what you say holds true, that they end up voting left anyways. I'm not so sure right now.

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

Therein lies the rub

Expand full comment
GabeReal's avatar

Many of them will probably vote for Jill Stein.

Expand full comment
Pacificus's avatar

Yes, the real "Dr Jill" is another legit candidate the Dems are trying to screw.

Expand full comment
GabeReal's avatar

Yup, when Hillary called her a “Russian Asset” that definitely pissed me off. (I voted for Stein in 2016, before I learned more truth about Trump)

Expand full comment
Mista B's avatar

You know, I forget that lady exists 🤣. But yeah, she could possibly be the protest vote if more people know about her. Maybe. RFK has way, way more reach and influence than her.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

I hope for once you are wrong, Gabe.

Expand full comment