All good but I don't see how you or anyone else can say with authority that the 2020 election wasn't stolen. The issue was scrupulously not-investigated and not-adjudicated. Sorry.
As for “adjudicated,” I watched those cases carefully. All but one challenge were dismissed on procedural technicalities - lack of standing, improper venue, that kind of thing. Courts didn’t reach the merits. The exception, a Pennsylvania trial judge who ruled for Trump, was quickly reversed by the PA Supreme Court, mostly Democrats.
Several cases were dismissed by judges for "lack of standing". What a joke. Any candidate of any election has all the "standing" they ever need if they believe and have some legal basis to prove the election is stolen. What the H-ll does standing even mean if not that you are directly impacted by some illegality?
..dam right we do. If cheating in Mich, Minn , Wisc, and AZ throws a close presidential election, THAT effects everyone in every state, NULLIFYING legitimate votes.
...and BTW, out of perhaps 1million people at the Capitol on J6, only some 2000 entered, unarmed, no fires. We've seen evidence that some were invited in. We've seen RayEpps. Plenty evidence J6 was a SET UP, and THIS is why DOJ is RE-OPENING the PipeBomb investigation. If PipeBombs were planted by FBI/DEMS/CIA, THAT would essentially BLOW UP (pun) the left's narrative about J6.
Ozzie is a former Dem congressman and party insider who ran a vote selling scam in Philadelphia. I am not fabricating this, he pleaded guilty. His guilty plea covers elections from 2014-2018. The Feds started investigating a tip in 2021, and charged and got the guilty plea in 2022.
He pled guilty to "conspiracy to deprive voters of civil rights, bribery, obstruction of justice, falsification of voting records, and conspiring to illegally vote in a federal election for orchestrating schemes to fraudulently stuff the ballot boxes for specific Democratic candidates".
Now, you're telling me that the guy who ran this scheme on behalf of Dems from 2014-2018 and was first investigated in 2021, DID NOT run this scheme in 2020, when the fate of the free world hung in the balance according to people who think like him?
Why yes, I do believe you that is the most likely scenario, and not that the Department of Justice that at least had the decency to shut him down still didn't want to admit there was anything wrong with 2020 and just went silent on what he did then. I do believe you, and I also would like to buy that bridge from Crimea to Russia you're selling, thanks.
BTW anybody who has a FOIA clue and wants to work on a submission on this that, who knows, Bondi and Patel might actually think is a good idea to roll with, DM me.
As much as Bill Maher claims he’s a free thinker and scolds the Dems about many of the absurd issues they champion like transgender rights and illegal aliens, I’m convinced he’s either a shill for the deep state or otherwise he’s nothing more than a complete idiot. There are powerful people in high places who want to destroy America by attacking the fabric of our society and divide everyone.
I don't think Maher is a shill. He would have had to have been the past 30 years since he his schtick has not changed. I think he was at one time a far left progressive who seemed radical and bragged about that and now the political landscape has moved so far Left, as Musk describes with his diagram, that Maher seems just left of center. He has noticed too, which is why he finds he has common ground with Trump and RFK, Jr, who are really oldline Democrats. In fact, most of the Trump GOP would qualify as 60s Democrats, including me.
Maher considers himself a "free thinker" but he only goes slightly outside the boundaries of what is acceptable for a Democrat to think. He's also smoked weed for decades and isn't as smart as he thinks he is.
I know what you mean. At times while under the influence of some really potent Kush and having startling revelations about something, I write it all down. Later on after the effects have worn off, I read it and laugh at how idiotic it is.
Exactly. Mostly, the reason given was "no proof" of election interference or fraud was presented. But...isn't that what a trial is for? Since when do you need to provide the "proof" in order to get to the actual hearing? Seems like there was ample "proof" to be considered moving forward, but not to be permitted.
Doesn't matter if you think standing should exist, and it should, the judges ruled otherwise because they did not want to open up to investigation. Meanwhile this week in Georgia, Dominion voting machines took away 74% of one candidate's votes. So there's that.
dems are fond of saying "no evidence" while there was a lot of evidence that was never tried or weighed. the fact that they got away with this will encourage more of it. they must be made to pay a price. one they cannot afford to pay again. that is the only way the behavior ends.
Exactly. They never got their day in court because the areas where "suspect" voter behavior occurred were Democratic strongholds, and the judges denied them due process. Not the same as "adjudicated."
The PA Supreme Court was 4 Republicans and 3 Democrats at the time. They ruled 4-3 to allow the methods of ballot curing and signature checking that were used in PA in 2020. However, the fact that it was a ruling (at least for the swing vote judge, a Republican appointment) on procedural technicalities exactly as you say was laid out in the court's written opinion. That judge said that while the complaints on the ballot handling may have merit, he was ruling to allow them based on "laches" - the concept that the Trump campaign and GOP could have filed complaints when the methods were put into law months earlier before the election and did not. There is a principle under the law where not acting on a legal opportunity does mean you waive it. To be fair, the GOP and Trump campaign claim they did have a case they brought in the early days but it was dismissed, which if true makes the SC justice's logic way off. I haven't run that to ground.
In 2022, acting on this admonishment that they let things lie before the 2020 election and had to suffer with the results, the GOP did bring suit against these methods to invalidate them before the 2022 election. The same PA SC found that the methods were illegal and could not be used in 2022.
Therefore, it is undoubtedly true that the methods used to judge ballots as valid in the 2020 PA election were later found to be illegal. They simply were allowed to stand as results in 2020 due to legal technicalities.
In light of these circumstances, that anyone could somehow say that someone like Josh Hawley was unprincipled in raising an objection to the PA results for Congress to consider is ridiculous. This is exactly the type of issue that can exist that makes it a wise system to have Congress be able to look at election results afterward.
If indeed the PA court had 4 Republicans at the time, I appreciate the correction to my faulty memory. However, many Republicans, especially along the Eastern seaboard, are Never-Trumpers who supported Biden.
I am fully on board with that and I hate it when people cite "even Republicans" disagree with Trump on something as if that proves anything when his push back is against the sixth party system bipartisan consensus overall.
My overall point was more that you were right. Many/most of the judgments were on technical grounds. In PA it was unarguably determined later that the technical grounds decision would not or should not have gone in favor of letting the vote stand, except for the technicality.
You might appreciate study of the election of 1876, wherein the party that lost the election at first won the presidency, and the result was not even determined by the vote, but rather by a backroom deal to trade off other benefits for agreeing to stop contesting the issue of the presidency.
In light of 1876, people that say that the very modest pushback, through means of legal redress, in 2020, was at all untoward or exceptional make fools of themselves. In fact, the fact that 1876 went the other way when there was enough valid pushback to contest it makes Trump's pushback look entirely rational. If you get traction, you can make a deal. He didn't get traction because there wasn't enough there, but there was enough there to justify a lot of skepticism about how umblemished it all was.
As a financial person, had I ever gotten a financial statement with as many red flags as that election, I would have had auditors all over it. The resistance to any sort of investigation told me all I needed to know. If it had been honest, Democrats would have wanted an audit for the sake of legitimacy.
There were some audits, at the request of GOPers (AZ comes to mind). The problem is that audits merely recount the ballots that were counted the first time. I believe that the “irregularities” came via the Dems’ GOTV practices, which likely exceeded what was allowed legally.
When you combine automatic voter registration and automatic mailing of ballots to every voter, there is enormous potential for coercion by (paid) “community organizers” (they were getting $30/hr in my area), or even outright fraud. How hard would it be to get into the mailbox room of an apartment building, and pick up all the discarded ballots from people who had moved? How hard is it to “help” voters in low income/low education areas fill out their ballots, and then offer to drop them off?
Yep. Plus good old fashioned ballot box stuffing in Atlanta, Detroit, Las Vegas, Milwaukee and Philadelphia. The problem you note in AZ was actually perpetrated by McCain Republicans.
I was registered Independent before I left California eight years ago (previously Democrat). I received two mail in ballots from California for the 2020 election (had never voted by mail in my life).
A neighbor got six ballots in the mail: two for him, four for previous residents who had passed or moved years before (lots of retirees in our neck of NC).
He showed them to me - this isn’t hearsay.
My husband got a notice in January of THIS YEAR that his name was being removed from the California voter rolls, because he had failed to vote in the last TWO elections. He wonders who he voted for from 2017 through 2023.
4) Showed that there was both fraud and problematic ballots - however, not in numbers that would affect the results
5) Used as an opportunity by both sides to play awful public relations games claiming outrage and court wing voters
both Katie Hobbs and Kari Lake made their name in that fight, and it was awful to watch. Awful to watch the Dems demonize the process, which was a valid one and the right of the state to conduct. Awful of the GOP to trumpet findings too early and with too much claimed.
But that's today's politics of outrage, and the people are the ones that vote them into office after they do that for the very reason that they got our attention while doing it.
When it took days to 'count' the ballots, and then they announced tht Biden won, and THEN said that anybody who questioned the result was delusional, THAT'S when I knew the whole thing was rigged.
You may remember, pretty much word for word, here is what all the MSM said; "We have no evidence that there was voter fraud to a degree that would have altered the results." That statement has more exceptions than it has statement.
Lets see. A party that rigged the system so that they would produce nominees their donors wanted also covered up for POTUS cognitive decline but somehow didn't use the covid-presented opportunity to rig 2020 election? Yeah, not buying it. I think that more people than just MAGA privately thought the same. hence why Democrats failed to make the Jan 6 fetch happen. If you privately think election was stolen or rigged you won't hate on anyone who expressed that publically.
Abroad, people were saying that election was stolen and Biden demented. From day one. They were, like, no way 81M voted for that zombie. One look at the guy and it was all clear.
All legal attempts to give evidence was quashed as in “ no standing”, stopping any hearing on the merits. Also, a big one - does anyone really believe Biden got more votes than Obama?
The election of Obama was supposedly “transformative”. Biden, “running” from his basement, making few campaign appearances, beat Obama’s numbers by a country mile. And midwits still think there was nothing fishy about this… 🤦♂️
Agree. We've never gotten an explanation of those 0200 ballot drops, or what happened to the 15 million voters who popped up over the trendline in 2020. It's very sus.
Do not forget the sudden and near-simultaneous pause in counting in several counties in swing states. Citing reasons which turned out to be completely bogus (water main break,) the counting was resumed by only a few people- no oversight- resulting in sudden steep spikes in Biden’s count.
Explain the vote discrepancy in total votes from 2016, and 2024 to 2020. Covid, mail ins, shipping in ballots, drop boxes, etc. Doesn't matter. It actually helped Trump to show the idiocy of Demoncats and give him time to recalibrate and recruit the right people this time around.
Unfortunately, the Hydra that is the deepstate/Blob, is so big it will take more that 4 years to cut off all the heads. If Demoncats get back in power with their RINO buddies, this will all have been for naught until we have an actual fighting Civil War.
Yes, the courts dismissed the cases on procedural grounds, far as I can determine. I recall that one court said that the plaintiffs 'lacked standing'. Seems to me that any U.S. citizen would have standing in a case of fraud in a federal election.
No hiding the power of the Deep State now. It's all in the open.
How can anyone look into the camera and say, "the 2020 election wasn't stolen"? If they say that, they are stating as fact something THEY CANNOT KNOW. If someone stole the election, the perpetrators will conceal what they did. No one except them will know what they did.
Albert Einstein famously said, all the physicist in the world cannot prove him right, but a single one can prove him wrong. He's saying. his theory may look right, and other elite scientists may know of no cases where it's wrong, but that doesn't PROVE it's NEVER wrong. This same principle applies to applies to elections.
That’s not the way it works; one has to prove that it WAS stolen. An affirmative defense is necessary. And look, I’m sympathetic. I think it was definitely tilted by the media and elites (like with Hunter’s laptop), things that, if known, I don’t think Biden wins.
For my part, I reviewed the vote counts from each swing state. Was there fraud? Yes. Was there net fraud in favor of Biden? Yes. But it wasn’t nearly enough to change the result. The reality is, they withheld info that would’ve caused people to not vote for Biden, which is up there with changing the vote totals. So I am sympathetic to it; but it’s NOT the same thing as actual votes being changed or discounted or wrongfully included, et al.
If that’s evidence that actual votes got changed, then Giuliani and Lindell & Co would have produced it by now, right?
Hillary still says that she won the 2016 election, although she’s become less vocal about it.
Have you seen the chart showing popular vote totals for the winner going back to George W? It shows the winners getting 62-74 millions of votes for Bush, Obama, Obama, and Trump. The outlier is Biden’s spiking to 81.2 million votes in 2020. Is this explained solely by population growth? Maybe, maybe not. Biden in his basement wasn’t exactly an inspiring campaigner.
The extra millions of votes were the result of vote harvesting that was carried out in places where it was illegal to do so. COVID was the excuse. It should be illegal everywhere because the harvester KNOWS how people vote and could either coerce, change, lose, or replace the ballot depending on their sympathies. Vote harvesting empowers people with money to pay folks to go out and buy/coerce/change/lose/replace votes. It further empowers political parties and incumbents.
In 2020 we were all trying to make sense of the pandemic. It's human nature to control what you can, so more people voted. With the shut down more people also had time to pay attention to politics. This desire to do...something, anything in the face of a virus led to lots of politicians and "experts" espousing policies that were not fact, history, or science based, but it did lead more people to vote. A lot was hidden from voters, like shadow banning on twitters and the three month period the vaccine worked was discovered before the election, yet the votes came from Americans who had the time and inclination to do something.
That’s an interesting theory, and plausible. I would note that in many places strict government lockdowns were still in effect, keeping public gatherings to a minimum. On the west coast and in other states like Minnesota and New York, officials maintained emergency restrictions in place throughout 2020. Aggressive ballot harvesting and the implementation of voting rules to help Biden occurred during the election nonetheless, and I question to what extent the spike in his turnout was simply due to a desire to get out and vote to “do something” as you suggest. But it might’ve been a factor.
Did Bill Maher not know or forget that after Trump won in 2016 democrats conspired to delegitimize Trump's victory and launched the Hillary/Obama Russian Collusion Hoax which was seen by many as a coup attempt? Then again in 2024 democrats did all they could to keep Trump off the ballot, promote his assassination (still going on) and put him in prison. Which is worse, Trump not conceding or democrats pretending to concede while attempting a coup after the election and doing everything they can to stop what people elected Trump to do?
After the election in Nov 2016, there were tons of commercials by celebrity Dems ‘encouraging’ the Electors to vote against Trump in the Electoral meeting in December 2016, thus changing the way their state voted and the outcome of the election to Hillary. Funny how Maher and others conveniently forget that.
And the Democrats did the same to George Bush Jr in 2000 and again in 2004. They brought cases seeking to overthrow the election, and had those cases heard. The district court judges would not even give Trump the dignity of hearing his legal arguments. Two different judicial systems in America: one very generous for the liberals and another disinterested for the conservatives.
Was he stoned? He doesn’t seem like it in his rants on his night show (from the clips I have seen) but on these podcasts he sure seems like it. Was that a tincture he was drinking?
Mr. Mamet said something that needs to be said regularly to lefties complaining about something Trump did or didn’t do: “So what?”
I’m also sick and tired of all the hypothetical things lefties say about President Trump. They conveniently ignore all the concrete examples of all the criminal behavior of Democrats.
Never accept or listen to a hypothetical argument from a lefty. It’s just the demons in their head spewing out evil, as all demons do. Think of what exorcists go through when battling and casting out demons.
Yes. The “could”, “might”, and “may” garbage is just too much for me to handle.
I have been pointing out those headlines from MSM since 2017 to my leftie friends. Instead of asking why a national news organization has time to run hyperbolic scare articles, they can only say, “but he could!!!”
So could any president! Why not report actual news events?
Tariffs being a prime example. All the Dems were wrong on tariffs yet they still can’t see the error of their ways. In the grand scheme of things that’s great, because it further marginalizes them. I want the Dems to be totally discredited not only for their crimes, but also for their crazy policy positions.
My favorite part of that Maher/Mamet exchange was Mamet telling Maher he was full of shit. More people need to tell Maher this, maybe it will wake him up.
Just looked that concept up, that’s a perfect description of lefty insanity. Thank you!
One of President Trump’s greatest legacies is lifting the veil on all of the propaganda Americans have been fed their entire lives.
Regular people can now instantly look at most propaganda and say “that’s a lie”, “that’s fake”, “that’s not real” or “I don’t believe that”. It’s very powerful for regular Americans to see that they’ve been gaslit forever.
It affects both parties, but I think it’s the death knell for the Dems because that’s their whole agenda. Sure the Dems will always get 20% of people to go along with them, but it’s the insane 20% that are always the 20% in an 80/20 issue. Meaning that the Dems are always against common sense.
I have never heard any Dem strategist since the election explain how any Dem running for office can overcome the Dems always being the hardcore 20% on all 80/20 issues.
Here’s an interesting question that I’ve just started to look into based on the link Brian posted from Todd Hayen and your posts. Why was there still pockets of violence against American troops after Germany surrendered in WWII, yet in Japan after their surrender there was no violence or resentment against Americans? In fact, the Japanese people almost instantly had positive views of the Americans occupying Japan. This points to a cultural difference in facing Shadow Possession, and begs the question, how is American culture influencing the left to not confront their shadows? It has become obvious since the election that there is a leftist hardcore 20% of the population that are rigidly not confronting their shadows and have become the 20% of every 80/20 issue. In short, they are resisting common sense, and even worse, doing so vehemently as their recent violent actions show. So the American left is mimicking the Nazi true believers in post war Germany, and not the post war Japanese. One clue here may be that in Japan the overriding goal of the citizenry is societal harmony.
General MacArthur’s decision to keep Emperor Hirohito in place post war can now be seen as a genius move. In the Emperor’s broadcast of surrender on August 15, 1945, he stressed the following:
— A call for endurance and unity. He urged the Japanese people to “endure the unendurable and suffer what is insufferable” in order to pave the way for peace and future generations.
— A warning against disorder. He cautioned against emotions outbursts or internal strife that could damage Japan’s reputation in the eyes of the world. He emphasized the need for unity and discipline during the occupation.
— Focus on reconstruction. He encouraged the Japanese people to unite, cultivate virtue, and work together to rebuild the nation and maintain its dignity during the challenging road ahead.
My initial impression is that the hardcore American left is like is now like the post war Nazi true believers. They have no leader like the Emperor who will come forward and urge them to unite for the good of the country. This does not bode well for the Democrats. We see the American center responding in a mostly positive way to the Administration’s policy as they see positive results, but the left has dug in and it appears they do not have the capacity for change, i.e., to confront their shadow.
The 2020 election was stolen. Do you seriously believe that Biden got 81 million votes - more than any other presidential candidate in history? Give me a break.
He is smart enough to know that tacking to the middle now will probably bring in a few more viewers and money. Personally, I think is "openness" is just mercenary.
1) I'm fine with the use of the words "rigged" and "stolen" as they tell the right story. When you use terms like "highly unusual", "outside bounds of normal", or similar euphemism, the importance of what happened gets diluted and people's eyes glaze over. "Rigged" and "Stolen": it's the same outcome, but more direct word choice.
2) Voting machines/ballot counting are now actually being investigated - FINALLY. I know it's not "evidence", but that data suggested something was very wrong, and refusing to even admit that things looked askew was the first, frequent, and angry defense used to cutoff any real consideration.
As has been mentioned many, many, many times Trump certainly would not have been as muscular had he been allowed to take the office he rightfully won in 2020. So I can live with this outcome.
And the "cherry on top" is that had Trump been allowed to keep the office after the 2020 election, the raging, radical, downright batshit crazy Democrat party would have likely not exposed themselves as they have now. 4 years of free reign via "Autopen" emboldened them to reach far beyond their grasp as they thought they would have protection.
It still may be too late for Trump to fix things, but we'll see. Republicans need to be running at full throttle to increase their House and Senate majorities and not accept the usual trend of losing seats in the mid terms. This is not a "one and done" deal - Republicans need to win the next 6 election cycles to return this country to sanity.
OMB head Russ Voight is lights on smart. For ex. codifying Doge cuts cannot be part of the big, beautiful bill due to procedural rules. He explains clearly that rescission bills are being prepared to deal with DOGE & spending cuts that cannot be included in BBB & will only need a simple majority to pass. The recission process isn’t talked about much, as if they don’t want the masses to know.
Well said, especially like the way you point out ‘similar euphemism’ just weakens what really happened. Stolen. Rigged.
It’s also why so many of us like Trump. He says it clearly and with no misunderstanding whatsoever. He talks like we do. The Dems with their ‘professor style’ just make them look even more elitist. Heck, most of them have to read their outrages because it’s all ‘word of the day’ talking points with nothing original.
Trump didn't go home, but Hillary did? She and Obama conspired to undermine his entire presidency in 2016 by spending the next eight years hammering him as a Russian asset? Maher is a hack.
As Scott Adams once discovered, and pointed out on his podcast, Bill Maher only follows in-the-tank news — New York Times, WashPo, CNN, the Atlantic, etc. He's nothing more than a mind-fucked smarty-pants lucky enough to have a cable TV platform. He's stupid, snide, and arrogant. He'll eventually be disgraced. And, by the way, I'm serenely convinced that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen and never properly adjudicated.
Bill, nobody rioted. It was actually a peaceful protest.
But go ahead and cope and seethe.
Now talk about the firey but peaceful protests of the summer of love...tell us all about them and how they were justified because a criminal drug addict resisted arrest.
"The election was not stolen or rigged," you write with such naive confidence. If you are truly seeking the truth, may I recommend you read "Rigged" by Mollie Hemingway. She brings the receipts as to how they did it. It's vital you fully understand this piece of the story for you to continue to successfully write in this lane. Here's hoping! 🇺🇸
“While I work with Mollie and am highly aware of media corruption since it’s our bread and butter here at The Federalist, she still had many surprises for me inside “Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections.” Here I’ll share a few things she reports in the book that made me gasp out loud.”
“7 Insane Things I Just Learned About How U.S. Elections Are “Rigged.”
Love you, Sasha but you are dead wrong about the election in 2020. Absolutely stolen, hundreds of signed affidavits proving just that. Familiar with the mules?
Not only that, but down ballot elections were also rigged in 2024. They couldn’t steal the presidential election this
time because so many eyes were on it. But they rigged the Congress and the Senate elections. Just run the numbers and you’ll know.
…and this year, Jefferson Griffin had his NC Supreme Court seat stolen to go back to the incumbent (734 votes, after the GOP won a seat by 401 votes back in 2020), and somehow 65000 voters on a list had their votes legitimately counted in spite of the ID law. I think you are right that any election with results under 1,000 votes difference is not one Democrats can ever legally win, right?
All good but I don't see how you or anyone else can say with authority that the 2020 election wasn't stolen. The issue was scrupulously not-investigated and not-adjudicated. Sorry.
As for “adjudicated,” I watched those cases carefully. All but one challenge were dismissed on procedural technicalities - lack of standing, improper venue, that kind of thing. Courts didn’t reach the merits. The exception, a Pennsylvania trial judge who ruled for Trump, was quickly reversed by the PA Supreme Court, mostly Democrats.
Several cases were dismissed by judges for "lack of standing". What a joke. Any candidate of any election has all the "standing" they ever need if they believe and have some legal basis to prove the election is stolen. What the H-ll does standing even mean if not that you are directly impacted by some illegality?
My thought exactly. Every voter and state has standing in a general election for POTUS.
..dam right we do. If cheating in Mich, Minn , Wisc, and AZ throws a close presidential election, THAT effects everyone in every state, NULLIFYING legitimate votes.
...and BTW, out of perhaps 1million people at the Capitol on J6, only some 2000 entered, unarmed, no fires. We've seen evidence that some were invited in. We've seen RayEpps. Plenty evidence J6 was a SET UP, and THIS is why DOJ is RE-OPENING the PipeBomb investigation. If PipeBombs were planted by FBI/DEMS/CIA, THAT would essentially BLOW UP (pun) the left's narrative about J6.
Have y'all heard of Ozzie Myers?
Ozzie is a former Dem congressman and party insider who ran a vote selling scam in Philadelphia. I am not fabricating this, he pleaded guilty. His guilty plea covers elections from 2014-2018. The Feds started investigating a tip in 2021, and charged and got the guilty plea in 2022.
He pled guilty to "conspiracy to deprive voters of civil rights, bribery, obstruction of justice, falsification of voting records, and conspiring to illegally vote in a federal election for orchestrating schemes to fraudulently stuff the ballot boxes for specific Democratic candidates".
Now, you're telling me that the guy who ran this scheme on behalf of Dems from 2014-2018 and was first investigated in 2021, DID NOT run this scheme in 2020, when the fate of the free world hung in the balance according to people who think like him?
Why yes, I do believe you that is the most likely scenario, and not that the Department of Justice that at least had the decency to shut him down still didn't want to admit there was anything wrong with 2020 and just went silent on what he did then. I do believe you, and I also would like to buy that bridge from Crimea to Russia you're selling, thanks.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-edpa/pr/former-us-congressman-and-philadelphia-political-operative-pleads-guilty-election-fraud
BTW anybody who has a FOIA clue and wants to work on a submission on this that, who knows, Bondi and Patel might actually think is a good idea to roll with, DM me.
As much as Bill Maher claims he’s a free thinker and scolds the Dems about many of the absurd issues they champion like transgender rights and illegal aliens, I’m convinced he’s either a shill for the deep state or otherwise he’s nothing more than a complete idiot. There are powerful people in high places who want to destroy America by attacking the fabric of our society and divide everyone.
I don't think Maher is a shill. He would have had to have been the past 30 years since he his schtick has not changed. I think he was at one time a far left progressive who seemed radical and bragged about that and now the political landscape has moved so far Left, as Musk describes with his diagram, that Maher seems just left of center. He has noticed too, which is why he finds he has common ground with Trump and RFK, Jr, who are really oldline Democrats. In fact, most of the Trump GOP would qualify as 60s Democrats, including me.
I don’t think most, but certainly a goodly number.
Maher considers himself a "free thinker" but he only goes slightly outside the boundaries of what is acceptable for a Democrat to think. He's also smoked weed for decades and isn't as smart as he thinks he is.
I know what you mean. At times while under the influence of some really potent Kush and having startling revelations about something, I write it all down. Later on after the effects have worn off, I read it and laugh at how idiotic it is.
There were truckloads of evidence. It was never heard in a court of law.
Exactly. Mostly, the reason given was "no proof" of election interference or fraud was presented. But...isn't that what a trial is for? Since when do you need to provide the "proof" in order to get to the actual hearing? Seems like there was ample "proof" to be considered moving forward, but not to be permitted.
Yes, the test is "probable cause", not undeniable proof. That is what is presented at trial not during the phase of obtaining a hearing
Doesn't matter if you think standing should exist, and it should, the judges ruled otherwise because they did not want to open up to investigation. Meanwhile this week in Georgia, Dominion voting machines took away 74% of one candidate's votes. So there's that.
The whole TX case was one of the most well thought-through suits that was brought, and the SCOTUS punted on it for no apparent reason.
Exactly. In most cases, the court never even reviewed the evidence before throwing it out.
The courts have been overlooked for to long and we are witnessing in real time the 'resistance' in plain site. The ACLU has been captured, sadly.
dems are fond of saying "no evidence" while there was a lot of evidence that was never tried or weighed. the fact that they got away with this will encourage more of it. they must be made to pay a price. one they cannot afford to pay again. that is the only way the behavior ends.
This is CORRECT, and succinctly well said.
Exactly. They never got their day in court because the areas where "suspect" voter behavior occurred were Democratic strongholds, and the judges denied them due process. Not the same as "adjudicated."
The PA Supreme Court was 4 Republicans and 3 Democrats at the time. They ruled 4-3 to allow the methods of ballot curing and signature checking that were used in PA in 2020. However, the fact that it was a ruling (at least for the swing vote judge, a Republican appointment) on procedural technicalities exactly as you say was laid out in the court's written opinion. That judge said that while the complaints on the ballot handling may have merit, he was ruling to allow them based on "laches" - the concept that the Trump campaign and GOP could have filed complaints when the methods were put into law months earlier before the election and did not. There is a principle under the law where not acting on a legal opportunity does mean you waive it. To be fair, the GOP and Trump campaign claim they did have a case they brought in the early days but it was dismissed, which if true makes the SC justice's logic way off. I haven't run that to ground.
In 2022, acting on this admonishment that they let things lie before the 2020 election and had to suffer with the results, the GOP did bring suit against these methods to invalidate them before the 2022 election. The same PA SC found that the methods were illegal and could not be used in 2022.
Therefore, it is undoubtedly true that the methods used to judge ballots as valid in the 2020 PA election were later found to be illegal. They simply were allowed to stand as results in 2020 due to legal technicalities.
In light of these circumstances, that anyone could somehow say that someone like Josh Hawley was unprincipled in raising an objection to the PA results for Congress to consider is ridiculous. This is exactly the type of issue that can exist that makes it a wise system to have Congress be able to look at election results afterward.
Kelly Green - I researched the 2020 PA Supreme Court and discovered that 4 of the 7, and possibly a fifth (Max Baer), were Democrats on that bench.
You are right... I was thinking of Wisconsin. https://apnews.com/article/wisonsin-supreme-court-trump-lawsuit-e6b3aa222b4141c0844d541c4b041964
However, it is the case that in the ballots in Pennsylvania, that case was also decided on a technical point - laches.
If indeed the PA court had 4 Republicans at the time, I appreciate the correction to my faulty memory. However, many Republicans, especially along the Eastern seaboard, are Never-Trumpers who supported Biden.
I am fully on board with that and I hate it when people cite "even Republicans" disagree with Trump on something as if that proves anything when his push back is against the sixth party system bipartisan consensus overall.
My overall point was more that you were right. Many/most of the judgments were on technical grounds. In PA it was unarguably determined later that the technical grounds decision would not or should not have gone in favor of letting the vote stand, except for the technicality.
You might appreciate study of the election of 1876, wherein the party that lost the election at first won the presidency, and the result was not even determined by the vote, but rather by a backroom deal to trade off other benefits for agreeing to stop contesting the issue of the presidency.
In light of 1876, people that say that the very modest pushback, through means of legal redress, in 2020, was at all untoward or exceptional make fools of themselves. In fact, the fact that 1876 went the other way when there was enough valid pushback to contest it makes Trump's pushback look entirely rational. If you get traction, you can make a deal. He didn't get traction because there wasn't enough there, but there was enough there to justify a lot of skepticism about how umblemished it all was.
As a financial person, had I ever gotten a financial statement with as many red flags as that election, I would have had auditors all over it. The resistance to any sort of investigation told me all I needed to know. If it had been honest, Democrats would have wanted an audit for the sake of legitimacy.
There were some audits, at the request of GOPers (AZ comes to mind). The problem is that audits merely recount the ballots that were counted the first time. I believe that the “irregularities” came via the Dems’ GOTV practices, which likely exceeded what was allowed legally.
When you combine automatic voter registration and automatic mailing of ballots to every voter, there is enormous potential for coercion by (paid) “community organizers” (they were getting $30/hr in my area), or even outright fraud. How hard would it be to get into the mailbox room of an apartment building, and pick up all the discarded ballots from people who had moved? How hard is it to “help” voters in low income/low education areas fill out their ballots, and then offer to drop them off?
These are things that don’t show up in an audit.
Yep. Plus good old fashioned ballot box stuffing in Atlanta, Detroit, Las Vegas, Milwaukee and Philadelphia. The problem you note in AZ was actually perpetrated by McCain Republicans.
Which explains the 11 million more votes Joe got than Barack ... stuffed ballot boxes.
Richard J. Daley Chicago's Mayor from 1956-76 wrote the playbook.
2016 Wisconsin Green Party 36,000 votes
2020 Wisconsin Green Party 0 , yes zero votes. Kicked off the ballot in Sep.
2016 Trump wins WI by 20,000 plus votes
2020 Trump loses WI by 20,000 plus votes
2024 Trump wins WI by 20,000 plus votes. Green Party on the ballot....
WI elections are as suspect as Chicago's. WI RINOs and Ds still in charge.
I was registered Independent before I left California eight years ago (previously Democrat). I received two mail in ballots from California for the 2020 election (had never voted by mail in my life).
A neighbor got six ballots in the mail: two for him, four for previous residents who had passed or moved years before (lots of retirees in our neck of NC).
He showed them to me - this isn’t hearsay.
My husband got a notice in January of THIS YEAR that his name was being removed from the California voter rolls, because he had failed to vote in the last TWO elections. He wonders who he voted for from 2017 through 2023.
Nothing to see here.
I disagree, I thought the AZ audit was:
1) Warranted
2) Well done
3) Conclusive
4) Showed that there was both fraud and problematic ballots - however, not in numbers that would affect the results
5) Used as an opportunity by both sides to play awful public relations games claiming outrage and court wing voters
both Katie Hobbs and Kari Lake made their name in that fight, and it was awful to watch. Awful to watch the Dems demonize the process, which was a valid one and the right of the state to conduct. Awful of the GOP to trumpet findings too early and with too much claimed.
But that's today's politics of outrage, and the people are the ones that vote them into office after they do that for the very reason that they got our attention while doing it.
yes ballots do not equal voters
Nah....It was just 'fortified'. Ya know....for our own good, etc. Onv the Dems know the long game....ffs
When it took days to 'count' the ballots, and then they announced tht Biden won, and THEN said that anybody who questioned the result was delusional, THAT'S when I knew the whole thing was rigged.
You may remember, pretty much word for word, here is what all the MSM said; "We have no evidence that there was voter fraud to a degree that would have altered the results." That statement has more exceptions than it has statement.
Yes, the MSM asked the people accused of voter fraud if they did anything wrong and they said no. Solid reporting!
Lets see. A party that rigged the system so that they would produce nominees their donors wanted also covered up for POTUS cognitive decline but somehow didn't use the covid-presented opportunity to rig 2020 election? Yeah, not buying it. I think that more people than just MAGA privately thought the same. hence why Democrats failed to make the Jan 6 fetch happen. If you privately think election was stolen or rigged you won't hate on anyone who expressed that publically.
Abroad, people were saying that election was stolen and Biden demented. From day one. They were, like, no way 81M voted for that zombie. One look at the guy and it was all clear.
Biden ran unsuccessfully (in primaries) several times
Clearly, the deep state had something to do with his winning millions more that ever in American history
the deep state doesnt let you win unless they have rock solid blackmail 6 ways from Sunday
2000 Mules tells the story. Watch it before stating “the 2020 election wasn’t stolen.”
All legal attempts to give evidence was quashed as in “ no standing”, stopping any hearing on the merits. Also, a big one - does anyone really believe Biden got more votes than Obama?
By definition the 2020 election was stolen/rigged.
Stolen: Took without permission or legal right
Rigged: Deliberately manipulated to produce a specific outcome
The election of Obama was supposedly “transformative”. Biden, “running” from his basement, making few campaign appearances, beat Obama’s numbers by a country mile. And midwits still think there was nothing fishy about this… 🤦♂️
Agree. We've never gotten an explanation of those 0200 ballot drops, or what happened to the 15 million voters who popped up over the trendline in 2020. It's very sus.
there's no way way Joe Labotomy got 81 million votes whereas Teh One got 64 million.
Do not forget the sudden and near-simultaneous pause in counting in several counties in swing states. Citing reasons which turned out to be completely bogus (water main break,) the counting was resumed by only a few people- no oversight- resulting in sudden steep spikes in Biden’s count.
Totally legit, right?
Explain the vote discrepancy in total votes from 2016, and 2024 to 2020. Covid, mail ins, shipping in ballots, drop boxes, etc. Doesn't matter. It actually helped Trump to show the idiocy of Demoncats and give him time to recalibrate and recruit the right people this time around.
Unfortunately, the Hydra that is the deepstate/Blob, is so big it will take more that 4 years to cut off all the heads. If Demoncats get back in power with their RINO buddies, this will all have been for naught until we have an actual fighting Civil War.
Agree. It was stolen.
Yes, the courts dismissed the cases on procedural grounds, far as I can determine. I recall that one court said that the plaintiffs 'lacked standing'. Seems to me that any U.S. citizen would have standing in a case of fraud in a federal election.
No hiding the power of the Deep State now. It's all in the open.
How can anyone look into the camera and say, "the 2020 election wasn't stolen"? If they say that, they are stating as fact something THEY CANNOT KNOW. If someone stole the election, the perpetrators will conceal what they did. No one except them will know what they did.
Albert Einstein famously said, all the physicist in the world cannot prove him right, but a single one can prove him wrong. He's saying. his theory may look right, and other elite scientists may know of no cases where it's wrong, but that doesn't PROVE it's NEVER wrong. This same principle applies to applies to elections.
That’s not the way it works; one has to prove that it WAS stolen. An affirmative defense is necessary. And look, I’m sympathetic. I think it was definitely tilted by the media and elites (like with Hunter’s laptop), things that, if known, I don’t think Biden wins.
For my part, I reviewed the vote counts from each swing state. Was there fraud? Yes. Was there net fraud in favor of Biden? Yes. But it wasn’t nearly enough to change the result. The reality is, they withheld info that would’ve caused people to not vote for Biden, which is up there with changing the vote totals. So I am sympathetic to it; but it’s NOT the same thing as actual votes being changed or discounted or wrongfully included, et al.
If that’s evidence that actual votes got changed, then Giuliani and Lindell & Co would have produced it by now, right?
Hillary still says that she won the 2016 election, although she’s become less vocal about it.
Have you seen the chart showing popular vote totals for the winner going back to George W? It shows the winners getting 62-74 millions of votes for Bush, Obama, Obama, and Trump. The outlier is Biden’s spiking to 81.2 million votes in 2020. Is this explained solely by population growth? Maybe, maybe not. Biden in his basement wasn’t exactly an inspiring campaigner.
The extra millions of votes were the result of vote harvesting that was carried out in places where it was illegal to do so. COVID was the excuse. It should be illegal everywhere because the harvester KNOWS how people vote and could either coerce, change, lose, or replace the ballot depending on their sympathies. Vote harvesting empowers people with money to pay folks to go out and buy/coerce/change/lose/replace votes. It further empowers political parties and incumbents.
Interestingly all those extra voters disappeared the following election
Right. The winning number for Trump 2.0 backed off by 4 million from Biden’s number.
Inconceivable! Unfortunately absolutely zero will be done about it.
Suspicious!
That was one of my rabbit hole moments that I saw on Facebook after 2024.
A: "We really need to reach out more; Kamala had 20 million fewer votes than Biden."
B: "Maybe that's because those votes were fake in the first place?"
A: "Nahhhhh, if they were, we'd have known by now."
I'm trying to stay out of facebook fights, so I didn't say "We've been telling you that for years." But I wanted to.
That's the smoking gun
In big blue cities, they were offering fast food, coupons, etc., for completing a ballot
And cartons of cigarettes
In 2020 we were all trying to make sense of the pandemic. It's human nature to control what you can, so more people voted. With the shut down more people also had time to pay attention to politics. This desire to do...something, anything in the face of a virus led to lots of politicians and "experts" espousing policies that were not fact, history, or science based, but it did lead more people to vote. A lot was hidden from voters, like shadow banning on twitters and the three month period the vaccine worked was discovered before the election, yet the votes came from Americans who had the time and inclination to do something.
That’s an interesting theory, and plausible. I would note that in many places strict government lockdowns were still in effect, keeping public gatherings to a minimum. On the west coast and in other states like Minnesota and New York, officials maintained emergency restrictions in place throughout 2020. Aggressive ballot harvesting and the implementation of voting rules to help Biden occurred during the election nonetheless, and I question to what extent the spike in his turnout was simply due to a desire to get out and vote to “do something” as you suggest. But it might’ve been a factor.
I'm betting Biden didn't know he was running.
Did Bill Maher not know or forget that after Trump won in 2016 democrats conspired to delegitimize Trump's victory and launched the Hillary/Obama Russian Collusion Hoax which was seen by many as a coup attempt? Then again in 2024 democrats did all they could to keep Trump off the ballot, promote his assassination (still going on) and put him in prison. Which is worse, Trump not conceding or democrats pretending to concede while attempting a coup after the election and doing everything they can to stop what people elected Trump to do?
After the election in Nov 2016, there were tons of commercials by celebrity Dems ‘encouraging’ the Electors to vote against Trump in the Electoral meeting in December 2016, thus changing the way their state voted and the outcome of the election to Hillary. Funny how Maher and others conveniently forget that.
And the Democrats did the same to George Bush Jr in 2000 and again in 2004. They brought cases seeking to overthrow the election, and had those cases heard. The district court judges would not even give Trump the dignity of hearing his legal arguments. Two different judicial systems in America: one very generous for the liberals and another disinterested for the conservatives.
I'm looking at YOU, Mike Farrel! You and your cheesy moustache.
Was he stoned? He doesn’t seem like it in his rants on his night show (from the clips I have seen) but on these podcasts he sure seems like it. Was that a tincture he was drinking?
Mr. Mamet said something that needs to be said regularly to lefties complaining about something Trump did or didn’t do: “So what?”
I’m also sick and tired of all the hypothetical things lefties say about President Trump. They conveniently ignore all the concrete examples of all the criminal behavior of Democrats.
Never accept or listen to a hypothetical argument from a lefty. It’s just the demons in their head spewing out evil, as all demons do. Think of what exorcists go through when battling and casting out demons.
Yes. The “could”, “might”, and “may” garbage is just too much for me to handle.
I have been pointing out those headlines from MSM since 2017 to my leftie friends. Instead of asking why a national news organization has time to run hyperbolic scare articles, they can only say, “but he could!!!”
So could any president! Why not report actual news events?
Tariffs being a prime example. All the Dems were wrong on tariffs yet they still can’t see the error of their ways. In the grand scheme of things that’s great, because it further marginalizes them. I want the Dems to be totally discredited not only for their crimes, but also for their crazy policy positions.
My favorite part of that Maher/Mamet exchange was Mamet telling Maher he was full of shit. More people need to tell Maher this, maybe it will wake him up.
Yes! And then adding the cherry on top, he followed up with, "your full of shit" 😂👍👏
Just looked that concept up, that’s a perfect description of lefty insanity. Thank you!
One of President Trump’s greatest legacies is lifting the veil on all of the propaganda Americans have been fed their entire lives.
Regular people can now instantly look at most propaganda and say “that’s a lie”, “that’s fake”, “that’s not real” or “I don’t believe that”. It’s very powerful for regular Americans to see that they’ve been gaslit forever.
It affects both parties, but I think it’s the death knell for the Dems because that’s their whole agenda. Sure the Dems will always get 20% of people to go along with them, but it’s the insane 20% that are always the 20% in an 80/20 issue. Meaning that the Dems are always against common sense.
I have never heard any Dem strategist since the election explain how any Dem running for office can overcome the Dems always being the hardcore 20% on all 80/20 issues.
https://off-guardian.org/2025/05/31/the-liberal-heart-that-hates-first/
Great link! Thank you
Epic reply! Thank you
Here’s an interesting question that I’ve just started to look into based on the link Brian posted from Todd Hayen and your posts. Why was there still pockets of violence against American troops after Germany surrendered in WWII, yet in Japan after their surrender there was no violence or resentment against Americans? In fact, the Japanese people almost instantly had positive views of the Americans occupying Japan. This points to a cultural difference in facing Shadow Possession, and begs the question, how is American culture influencing the left to not confront their shadows? It has become obvious since the election that there is a leftist hardcore 20% of the population that are rigidly not confronting their shadows and have become the 20% of every 80/20 issue. In short, they are resisting common sense, and even worse, doing so vehemently as their recent violent actions show. So the American left is mimicking the Nazi true believers in post war Germany, and not the post war Japanese. One clue here may be that in Japan the overriding goal of the citizenry is societal harmony.
General MacArthur’s decision to keep Emperor Hirohito in place post war can now be seen as a genius move. In the Emperor’s broadcast of surrender on August 15, 1945, he stressed the following:
— A call for endurance and unity. He urged the Japanese people to “endure the unendurable and suffer what is insufferable” in order to pave the way for peace and future generations.
— A warning against disorder. He cautioned against emotions outbursts or internal strife that could damage Japan’s reputation in the eyes of the world. He emphasized the need for unity and discipline during the occupation.
— Focus on reconstruction. He encouraged the Japanese people to unite, cultivate virtue, and work together to rebuild the nation and maintain its dignity during the challenging road ahead.
My initial impression is that the hardcore American left is like is now like the post war Nazi true believers. They have no leader like the Emperor who will come forward and urge them to unite for the good of the country. This does not bode well for the Democrats. We see the American center responding in a mostly positive way to the Administration’s policy as they see positive results, but the left has dug in and it appears they do not have the capacity for change, i.e., to confront their shadow.
To discard the narrative Maher has adopted means an end to tony parties in the Hamptons this summer.
The 2020 election was stolen. Do you seriously believe that Biden got 81 million votes - more than any other presidential candidate in history? Give me a break.
He got them. The real question is how did he get them?
By machine algorithms and "ballots" available to feed the machine
If Trump got 81 million, much like the 75 million he got in 2020, we would both certainly believe it.
Bill isn’t half as smart as he thinks he is.
He is smart enough to know that tacking to the middle now will probably bring in a few more viewers and money. Personally, I think is "openness" is just mercenary.
I think you are right. Deep down in his core he’s still a POS.
Bill Maher is just a few steps ahead of Jake Tapper. Both are shilling for more 'likes' and $ under the new zeitgeist.
1) I'm fine with the use of the words "rigged" and "stolen" as they tell the right story. When you use terms like "highly unusual", "outside bounds of normal", or similar euphemism, the importance of what happened gets diluted and people's eyes glaze over. "Rigged" and "Stolen": it's the same outcome, but more direct word choice.
2) Voting machines/ballot counting are now actually being investigated - FINALLY. I know it's not "evidence", but that data suggested something was very wrong, and refusing to even admit that things looked askew was the first, frequent, and angry defense used to cutoff any real consideration.
As has been mentioned many, many, many times Trump certainly would not have been as muscular had he been allowed to take the office he rightfully won in 2020. So I can live with this outcome.
And the "cherry on top" is that had Trump been allowed to keep the office after the 2020 election, the raging, radical, downright batshit crazy Democrat party would have likely not exposed themselves as they have now. 4 years of free reign via "Autopen" emboldened them to reach far beyond their grasp as they thought they would have protection.
It still may be too late for Trump to fix things, but we'll see. Republicans need to be running at full throttle to increase their House and Senate majorities and not accept the usual trend of losing seats in the mid terms. This is not a "one and done" deal - Republicans need to win the next 6 election cycles to return this country to sanity.
And yet they seem to do nothing. RINOs all.
OMB head Russ Voight is lights on smart. For ex. codifying Doge cuts cannot be part of the big, beautiful bill due to procedural rules. He explains clearly that rescission bills are being prepared to deal with DOGE & spending cuts that cannot be included in BBB & will only need a simple majority to pass. The recission process isn’t talked about much, as if they don’t want the masses to know.
Well said, especially like the way you point out ‘similar euphemism’ just weakens what really happened. Stolen. Rigged.
It’s also why so many of us like Trump. He says it clearly and with no misunderstanding whatsoever. He talks like we do. The Dems with their ‘professor style’ just make them look even more elitist. Heck, most of them have to read their outrages because it’s all ‘word of the day’ talking points with nothing original.
Yes! Be like Trump. No days off.
Great piece. Maher is intelligent but a partisan rationalist.
Who had Sasha Stone based political observer on their bingo card? 😂.
Keep up the great work. 👏
Htf is Mader 'smart'? Dudes is a mediocre comedian turned infotainer. Maybe his agent is smart/savvy....Bill is pretty much a nitwit.
Those brain cells he keeps toking up in smoke!
Trump didn't go home, but Hillary did? She and Obama conspired to undermine his entire presidency in 2016 by spending the next eight years hammering him as a Russian asset? Maher is a hack.
I have 81,000,000 reasons why I don't think the 2020 election was on the up and up.
Great article great observations......accurate and true!
As Scott Adams once discovered, and pointed out on his podcast, Bill Maher only follows in-the-tank news — New York Times, WashPo, CNN, the Atlantic, etc. He's nothing more than a mind-fucked smarty-pants lucky enough to have a cable TV platform. He's stupid, snide, and arrogant. He'll eventually be disgraced. And, by the way, I'm serenely convinced that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen and never properly adjudicated.
James - I’ve been following your work for some time. It’s great reading and strikingly honest.
Bill, nobody rioted. It was actually a peaceful protest.
But go ahead and cope and seethe.
Now talk about the firey but peaceful protests of the summer of love...tell us all about them and how they were justified because a criminal drug addict resisted arrest.
"The election was not stolen or rigged," you write with such naive confidence. If you are truly seeking the truth, may I recommend you read "Rigged" by Mollie Hemingway. She brings the receipts as to how they did it. It's vital you fully understand this piece of the story for you to continue to successfully write in this lane. Here's hoping! 🇺🇸
Joy Pullmann at the Federalist also reviewed it.
“While I work with Mollie and am highly aware of media corruption since it’s our bread and butter here at The Federalist, she still had many surprises for me inside “Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections.” Here I’ll share a few things she reports in the book that made me gasp out loud.”
“7 Insane Things I Just Learned About How U.S. Elections Are “Rigged.”
The Federalist. Joy Pullmann. Oct 29, 2021
https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/29/7-insane-things-i-just-learned-about-how-u-s-elections-are-rigged/
Yes!
Love you, Sasha but you are dead wrong about the election in 2020. Absolutely stolen, hundreds of signed affidavits proving just that. Familiar with the mules?
Not only that, but down ballot elections were also rigged in 2024. They couldn’t steal the presidential election this
time because so many eyes were on it. But they rigged the Congress and the Senate elections. Just run the numbers and you’ll know.
Great point and yes, many House seats were stolen, especially in CA, along with a few other state Senate seats.
Yes, "keep counting until the Democrat wins" happened in many states
…and this year, Jefferson Griffin had his NC Supreme Court seat stolen to go back to the incumbent (734 votes, after the GOP won a seat by 401 votes back in 2020), and somehow 65000 voters on a list had their votes legitimately counted in spite of the ID law. I think you are right that any election with results under 1,000 votes difference is not one Democrats can ever legally win, right?