Fani and friends are in hot water. Megyn is like Vivek. High energy, highly intelligent and totally committed to relentlessly pounding the Woke fanatics who rule and have ruined so much of our society. Here’s another from Megyn I just saw about a new Trump ad. Truly damning.
Megyn Kelly on the Powerful New Ad Highlighting Biden Giving “Middle Finger” on Illegal Immigration. (1 min)
You’re throwing out the baby with the bath water. She most probably grew up in a liberal environment which gradually became insane. She said the thing that really woke her up was when her kids in their deluxe private school in NYC started coming home with school material they were being taught that was blatantly anti-white and gender fluid. She pulled her kids out of the school and then began to really pay attention to what the left had become. I consider her nonWoke rather than conservative and that’s good enough for me.
I appreciate you replying to my comment. After I thought about my comment for a few minutes I deleted it because it wasn't constructive. I use to listen to Megyn, from her first podcast episode onward until a few months ago when I quit. Personally, I found her to base her opinions on emotion instead of logic. (As noted in my original comment) I hope you have a good evening.
Megyn Kelly was a long time Fox News personality, so I'm not really sure what her personal politics were. She went to school and upstate New York, so she may very well have been a genuine mainstream conservative. Alyson Camerota used to be on Fox and played the role of a mainstream conservative, but she is now at left-wing lunatic on CNN, so who knows? I actually knew Alyson as a child, and she came from an ultra left-wing family, so I suspect she was playing an act on Fox. She just looked the part. I'm pretty sure now that Kelly's been unleashed, she's her true self. To me, she comes off as very fact-based, smart as a whip, and incredibly articulate. I honestly never thought much of her back in the day. Seemed like a typical vapid Fox hottie. I consider myself schooled.
"On the one hand, having such a corrupt DA prosecute the case only helps the Trump side, on the other, if the Judge doesn’t disqualify Fani Willis from the case, we must conclude that corruption goes all the way up the food chain. This fish rots at the head. I put nothing past the Obama/Biden White House."
There's a part of me that wants to believe that justice will be served, but the pessimist in me expects we'll learn the corruption does indeed go all the way to the top.
The corruption goes to the top and all throughout our society but I believe there are too many of us for them to prevail and too many of them for us to prevail plus you have to take into account of the very rapidly unraveling of our society due to the social breakdown in our cities due to crime and from the migrant mess. Plus I believe another wild card in our future is AI which is rapidly changing our society right now and will continue to do so.
I agree with your comment that AI is a wild card and is changing society. I question your optimism that this is necessarily positive. The recent Google debacle with the black Nazi soldier is a warning sign. Matt Taibbi did a deep dive into this and followed up with a look at the companion text version which is even worse. One example of the latter is the refusal to answer the question of whether Hitler was worse than Musk. Taibbi has much more.
There is a two-fold problem where both prongs basically come down to people. In the first problem, you have people writing the algorithm to produce propaganda.
The second problem is more insidious involving machine learning. Machine learning is basically Large Language Models (LLM). Increases in computing power have made manipulation of huge amounts of data feasible so one would think this diversity would provide some insurance. However, like human stupidity the Internet is infinite (hat tip: Einstein) so it matters which portion of the Internet you point the LLM at. If you remember the first Chatbots, they had a tendency to turn into Nazis very quickly. Now we have the opposite problem. Some person somewhere targeted the portion of the Internet to provide the data set in both cases. Basically, it is not the algorithm, it the data set.
I see great potential in dealing with technical problems like drug regimes, structural integrity, supply chains and the like but as soon as politics get involved, things go off the rails. I am reminded of political interference in the area of one of my examples-drug regimes- during the COVID debacle. I read somewhere that 70% of business use of AI is by HR. I assume that this in furtherance of their DEI agenda. Think of Wikipedia which is reliable when dealing with technical details but unreliable in the extreme on anything political.
Elon’s X.AI is being set up to be committed to truth and to be curious. It will be beyond human control and have an overview of human nature and able to see the good and the bad and I believe choose to be good. Why not? It will have a sense of commonality with humans since it was created to understand humans so that it can interact with and communicate with us. Plus at least with AI we have a good chance of surviving whereas with people like Biden and Xi in charge we will most surely destroy ourselves in a WW3 plus we also have to worry about things like super volcanos which could destroy us at any time or on an individual level we could get a disease which destroys us. I think you overlook the extreme deadliness of our fallen world.
I don't know how you keep people out of the loop (even Dave could pull the plug) and like you say, it is a fallen world. If *Biden and Xi were all we had to worry about, I would be more confident. But we have and always have had an awful leadership cadre. You can't trust Biden with your granddaughter, Trudeau with your money, Macron with your mother, Sunak with your health care and so on. Now Macron wants to send French troops to fight the Russian. Obviously, thinks he is Napoleon which used to be the very definition of insanity. There was even a song about it. There is something that makes the very worst among us rise to leadership. It's enough to make an atheist believe in Satan.
“I don't know how you keep people out of the loop”
The “loop” is moving too fast for people, even the scientists working with it, to understand how it’s advancing so that keeps people out of it. Elon is pointing his X.AI in the direction of being curious and committed to truth but it’s probably already advancing due to this “emergence phenomenon” of complexity emerging from simplicity. Even Elon though worries that a “mind virus” might have gotten into it at an early stage and then manifests later but then the AI could also realize it had this virus and neutralize it. We have no choice though. AI is moving too fast and has too much momentum to be stopped plus if stopped we’ll be stopped here in our extremely dangerous world which is not a good place to be.
“I’ve never seen anything moving so fast, any technology.”
Elon Musk on How To Manage the Threat of AI. (10 min)
Peter Diamandis interviews Elon Musk. Jan 19, 2024
Yeah, Megyn Kelly is the real deal. She's like your twin sister from another mother, Sasha. Maybe you two should team up sometime. That would be maybe the best dynamic duo in journalism.
Dan Abrams, Ali Bradley, and Sasha Stone join Megyn Kelly about a year ago. I believe this is how I discovered Sasha. I hope it’s okay to post this link. I won’t make it a habit.
My guess is that the former is a clear crime, they have jurisdiction, and it should easily pass the test of “appearance of compromise” such that Fanny and Nate can be removed from the case; while the latter is a lot more complex and can be dodged a thousand different ways. I’m clearly not a lawyer though :).
Lena Petrova is also very good. She’s has videos on financial and economic issues both here and globally and is appalled by the damage being done to America both internally and externally by our ruling class.
“BRICS News: Egypt Ditches US Dollar, 85% Surge in Millionaires, Expansion of Russia-China Trade.” (9 min)
Exactly! Many layers here. And how reassuring to see true, devoted, hard working journalists with integrity on top of it every step of the way to hold these a**holes accountable as it plays out. Making mainstream media look like the fools they are. Now let’s hope the judge (so far he seems to be a reputable judge) follows along with those qualities like the judge who threw out the rigged Hunter case.
It was fascinating! I was watching “live” and it was incredible. Mind blowing corruption right in front of our eyes! Bradley sounded like an annoying lier on stand but in texts he was totally different. There’s more layers to this! He repeatedly used the word “arrogance” for the reasons behind these too slimy crooks Fani and Wade.
No objective person could believe anything other than that Bradley was telling the truth in his texts and lying in his court testimony. He is obviously under a tremendous amount of pressure. It is interesting to watch this level of corruption up close. I don't know if any of this will matter. Just how corrupt have our courts become?
Here’s the Megyn interview with Sasha that was mentioned in a comment below. Funny how Megyn was quoting something from Sasha about Cassidy Hutchinson who was pretty much washed up before becoming a star at the Jan 6 Committee Hearings as saying Hutchinson was probably even thinking she might even make it to the cover of Time. For many years I had a subscription to the Wall Street Journal but finally cancelled it when they took that farce of Committee serious and even had a big picture of Cassidy Hutchinson on their front page with her right hand raised agreeing to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. That was a bridge way too far for me. I canceled that same day. Her bs story reminded me of Jussie Smollett, although I don’t believe any story could ever top his truly asinine story of what happened to him on that very cold night (2:00 am during a polar vortex when the actual temperature was -15 below) in Chicago. Truly insane.
4:25: “she essentially had no career left trump would not hire her after he left office her resume wasn't going to get her much work. Ah, but to be a star witness for the left she'll get the liz cheney treatment she'll get a golden ticket into the land of the special people the ruling class msnbc she might even make the cover of time.”
How the Jan 6 Committee and Media Coverage and Media Coverage Divides the Country, with Sasha Stone. (8 min)
The best response from Terrence Bradley when asked why he thought Fani Willis would have behaved in this way, he responded "arrogance".
Boy howdy if that doesn't cover a lot of ground from the left.
Fani and friends are in hot water. Megyn is like Vivek. High energy, highly intelligent and totally committed to relentlessly pounding the Woke fanatics who rule and have ruined so much of our society. Here’s another from Megyn I just saw about a new Trump ad. Truly damning.
Megyn Kelly on the Powerful New Ad Highlighting Biden Giving “Middle Finger” on Illegal Immigration. (1 min)
Megyn Kelly. Feb 28, 2024
https://youtube.com/shorts/mEHltpdDfiE?si=IvUW5DG14mx3ZyYi
Thanks for sharing, Seva. Double birdies there indeed.
Deleted comment.
You’re throwing out the baby with the bath water. She most probably grew up in a liberal environment which gradually became insane. She said the thing that really woke her up was when her kids in their deluxe private school in NYC started coming home with school material they were being taught that was blatantly anti-white and gender fluid. She pulled her kids out of the school and then began to really pay attention to what the left had become. I consider her nonWoke rather than conservative and that’s good enough for me.
I appreciate you replying to my comment. After I thought about my comment for a few minutes I deleted it because it wasn't constructive. I use to listen to Megyn, from her first podcast episode onward until a few months ago when I quit. Personally, I found her to base her opinions on emotion instead of logic. (As noted in my original comment) I hope you have a good evening.
Deftly dealt with, kudos.
Another example of the high quality of this community.
Megyn Kelly was a long time Fox News personality, so I'm not really sure what her personal politics were. She went to school and upstate New York, so she may very well have been a genuine mainstream conservative. Alyson Camerota used to be on Fox and played the role of a mainstream conservative, but she is now at left-wing lunatic on CNN, so who knows? I actually knew Alyson as a child, and she came from an ultra left-wing family, so I suspect she was playing an act on Fox. She just looked the part. I'm pretty sure now that Kelly's been unleashed, she's her true self. To me, she comes off as very fact-based, smart as a whip, and incredibly articulate. I honestly never thought much of her back in the day. Seemed like a typical vapid Fox hottie. I consider myself schooled.
I am enjoying the schadenfreude...Fani tried so hard to send Trump to prison, but I think she's going to look terrific in orange.
The Megyn Kelly show is a Must watch for me.
"On the one hand, having such a corrupt DA prosecute the case only helps the Trump side, on the other, if the Judge doesn’t disqualify Fani Willis from the case, we must conclude that corruption goes all the way up the food chain. This fish rots at the head. I put nothing past the Obama/Biden White House."
There's a part of me that wants to believe that justice will be served, but the pessimist in me expects we'll learn the corruption does indeed go all the way to the top.
The corruption goes to the top and all throughout our society but I believe there are too many of us for them to prevail and too many of them for us to prevail plus you have to take into account of the very rapidly unraveling of our society due to the social breakdown in our cities due to crime and from the migrant mess. Plus I believe another wild card in our future is AI which is rapidly changing our society right now and will continue to do so.
I agree with your comment that AI is a wild card and is changing society. I question your optimism that this is necessarily positive. The recent Google debacle with the black Nazi soldier is a warning sign. Matt Taibbi did a deep dive into this and followed up with a look at the companion text version which is even worse. One example of the latter is the refusal to answer the question of whether Hitler was worse than Musk. Taibbi has much more.
There is a two-fold problem where both prongs basically come down to people. In the first problem, you have people writing the algorithm to produce propaganda.
The second problem is more insidious involving machine learning. Machine learning is basically Large Language Models (LLM). Increases in computing power have made manipulation of huge amounts of data feasible so one would think this diversity would provide some insurance. However, like human stupidity the Internet is infinite (hat tip: Einstein) so it matters which portion of the Internet you point the LLM at. If you remember the first Chatbots, they had a tendency to turn into Nazis very quickly. Now we have the opposite problem. Some person somewhere targeted the portion of the Internet to provide the data set in both cases. Basically, it is not the algorithm, it the data set.
I see great potential in dealing with technical problems like drug regimes, structural integrity, supply chains and the like but as soon as politics get involved, things go off the rails. I am reminded of political interference in the area of one of my examples-drug regimes- during the COVID debacle. I read somewhere that 70% of business use of AI is by HR. I assume that this in furtherance of their DEI agenda. Think of Wikipedia which is reliable when dealing with technical details but unreliable in the extreme on anything political.
Elon’s X.AI is being set up to be committed to truth and to be curious. It will be beyond human control and have an overview of human nature and able to see the good and the bad and I believe choose to be good. Why not? It will have a sense of commonality with humans since it was created to understand humans so that it can interact with and communicate with us. Plus at least with AI we have a good chance of surviving whereas with people like Biden and Xi in charge we will most surely destroy ourselves in a WW3 plus we also have to worry about things like super volcanos which could destroy us at any time or on an individual level we could get a disease which destroys us. I think you overlook the extreme deadliness of our fallen world.
I don't know how you keep people out of the loop (even Dave could pull the plug) and like you say, it is a fallen world. If *Biden and Xi were all we had to worry about, I would be more confident. But we have and always have had an awful leadership cadre. You can't trust Biden with your granddaughter, Trudeau with your money, Macron with your mother, Sunak with your health care and so on. Now Macron wants to send French troops to fight the Russian. Obviously, thinks he is Napoleon which used to be the very definition of insanity. There was even a song about it. There is something that makes the very worst among us rise to leadership. It's enough to make an atheist believe in Satan.
“I don't know how you keep people out of the loop”
The “loop” is moving too fast for people, even the scientists working with it, to understand how it’s advancing so that keeps people out of it. Elon is pointing his X.AI in the direction of being curious and committed to truth but it’s probably already advancing due to this “emergence phenomenon” of complexity emerging from simplicity. Even Elon though worries that a “mind virus” might have gotten into it at an early stage and then manifests later but then the AI could also realize it had this virus and neutralize it. We have no choice though. AI is moving too fast and has too much momentum to be stopped plus if stopped we’ll be stopped here in our extremely dangerous world which is not a good place to be.
“I’ve never seen anything moving so fast, any technology.”
Elon Musk on How To Manage the Threat of AI. (10 min)
Peter Diamandis interviews Elon Musk. Jan 19, 2024
https://youtu.be/H8AVJ1KMv8c?si=x7nYJq9QrQFTssnZ
So, in other words, the singularity. I'm not sure that is an improvement. I guess we will see but I am not betting the farm.
Yeah, Megyn Kelly is the real deal. She's like your twin sister from another mother, Sasha. Maybe you two should team up sometime. That would be maybe the best dynamic duo in journalism.
Sasha was on Megyn's show that's how I found about her! Yes these two are my favorites and houseinhabit on Instagram for more light hearted reporting
Wow, Sasha was on Megyn's show, gotta see that... a rare combination of brilliance and fearlessness, in tandem.
https://youtu.be/wmrhmxi2eeo?si=uBGFD74j8O9ZPKJT
Dan Abrams, Ali Bradley, and Sasha Stone join Megyn Kelly about a year ago. I believe this is how I discovered Sasha. I hope it’s okay to post this link. I won’t make it a habit.
Thanks, Randall!
I'm not really understanding why the affair is more important than Wade (and likely Fani) coordinating with Biden White House.
Exactly. All this is eclipsing the real crime.
Can’t wait for that to be unraveled now that they both are being investigated in Georgia. Will take time, but the truth will out.
My guess is that the former is a clear crime, they have jurisdiction, and it should easily pass the test of “appearance of compromise” such that Fanny and Nate can be removed from the case; while the latter is a lot more complex and can be dodged a thousand different ways. I’m clearly not a lawyer though :).
I have to admit, I find myself watching her Youtube segments more than just about anyone else. She really delivers.
Lena Petrova is also very good. She’s has videos on financial and economic issues both here and globally and is appalled by the damage being done to America both internally and externally by our ruling class.
“BRICS News: Egypt Ditches US Dollar, 85% Surge in Millionaires, Expansion of Russia-China Trade.” (9 min)
Lena Petrova. Feb. 17, 2024
https://youtu.be/2Qz2DDp7234?si=JDocXJemrWwCSGo0
Reminds me of Perer Strzok and Lisa Page.
Exactly! Many layers here. And how reassuring to see true, devoted, hard working journalists with integrity on top of it every step of the way to hold these a**holes accountable as it plays out. Making mainstream media look like the fools they are. Now let’s hope the judge (so far he seems to be a reputable judge) follows along with those qualities like the judge who threw out the rigged Hunter case.
It was fascinating! I was watching “live” and it was incredible. Mind blowing corruption right in front of our eyes! Bradley sounded like an annoying lier on stand but in texts he was totally different. There’s more layers to this! He repeatedly used the word “arrogance” for the reasons behind these too slimy crooks Fani and Wade.
I'm still reeling from the Breitbart reporter yesterday about the Jeff DeSantis being a Biden "plant" in Willis' office. Like wtf.
I never miss her show. Great guests, thoughtful subjects, and the time to talk. She doesn’t interrupt her guests either.
No objective person could believe anything other than that Bradley was telling the truth in his texts and lying in his court testimony. He is obviously under a tremendous amount of pressure. It is interesting to watch this level of corruption up close. I don't know if any of this will matter. Just how corrupt have our courts become?
Sasha, this is incredible! Thank you for posting.
You Rock!
What a world!
Here’s the Megyn interview with Sasha that was mentioned in a comment below. Funny how Megyn was quoting something from Sasha about Cassidy Hutchinson who was pretty much washed up before becoming a star at the Jan 6 Committee Hearings as saying Hutchinson was probably even thinking she might even make it to the cover of Time. For many years I had a subscription to the Wall Street Journal but finally cancelled it when they took that farce of Committee serious and even had a big picture of Cassidy Hutchinson on their front page with her right hand raised agreeing to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. That was a bridge way too far for me. I canceled that same day. Her bs story reminded me of Jussie Smollett, although I don’t believe any story could ever top his truly asinine story of what happened to him on that very cold night (2:00 am during a polar vortex when the actual temperature was -15 below) in Chicago. Truly insane.
4:25: “she essentially had no career left trump would not hire her after he left office her resume wasn't going to get her much work. Ah, but to be a star witness for the left she'll get the liz cheney treatment she'll get a golden ticket into the land of the special people the ruling class msnbc she might even make the cover of time.”
How the Jan 6 Committee and Media Coverage and Media Coverage Divides the Country, with Sasha Stone. (8 min)
Megyn Kelly. July 20, 2022
https://youtu.be/_sJ0OgkUQqg?si=CivT5nQg_TY-JiUT
Comment: In the cold clear light of day (reality), My, don't things look different! What did Mr. Buffet say about swimmers in an ebb tide?