505 Comments
User's avatar
Forheremenaremen's avatar

Biden-Harris didn't just encourage the migrant invasion - they fostered it, and made it all possible.

Remember, in Biden's first full day in office he signed multiple Executive Orders that ended Trump's successful border policies, and flung open the gates, both literally and figuratively.

The Democrats WANTED an open border. Lied about having one. And did zero to stop it.

This was all treasonous.

Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

“This was all treasonous.”

Obviously so but where are the democrats who say that? Half the country, our “fellow Americans” are very much on board with whatever the Democratic Party does. This is an impossible situation. No country can function like this and in fact America no longer is functioning as a country.

Expand full comment
Rudy's avatar

True, to some extent. Half the Country supports the Democrats because they hate Trump. They generally support the freebies and many/most of the Democrat policies. However, if there was a vote on Border security (ala Trump's actions vs Biden's), and Deportation of people here illegally (non-Citizens, non-Green card Holders,people without VISAs) I believe it would be 80/20 (not 50/50)

.

You can have free stuff and secure borders. Or you can have open borders and no free stuff. But, you can't have open borders and free stuff.

Expand full comment
Jim Ryser's avatar

But Newsome and friends try to convince us otherwise. And a helluva lot of people believe him. And that ass, Bass.

Expand full comment
BD's avatar

Yes...she's one pathetic POS.

Expand full comment
R H's avatar
Jun 8Edited

FAFO. There's a new sheriff in town now. Two things:

1) Pam Bondi needs to investigate who is paying these protesters and charge them and revoke their citizenship (e.g. the Soros family).

2) What is with the Demoncats propensity to elect black women who are at least one standard deviation below the average IQ of the general population?

And the obvious reason for open borders is to increase census numbers in blue states to gain more electoral votes and to allow illegal aliens to vote for Demoncats.

Expand full comment
Andrew P's avatar

Because the stakes are so incredibly high here - the Democrats are playing for perpetual power in perpetuity like they have in CA - I expect the Democrats to escalate to the max. They will never back down. They will escalate to pitched street battles that result in millions of deaths, and if that doesn't work, they will launch a new global pandemic (a real one this time) so all countries will shut their borders and nobody can be deported.

Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

“if there was a vote on Border security)

A couple of years ago there was a proposal in the Chicago city council to put our Sanctuary City status up for a vote. That went nowhere. The mayor and his allies immediately shot it down because they knew the vote would be against it. Yet still in the last election Trump only received 30% of the vote. Same would happen on a national level.

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

In the November 2024 elections, Multnomah County (where Portland is) went nearly 79% for Harris/Walz and 17% for Trump. I predict that the stats will lean even more Democratic at the midterms, unless some things happen that push waffling voters away from the leftists.

Expand full comment
Lady Mariposa's avatar

My congressional district in New Jersey went from Biden in 2020 to Trump in 2024. Fortunately, the rest of the country is not following the lead of Oregon.

My husband has family in Oregon and he loves the Pacific Northwest. We've talked about places where we might move when he retires and there was a time when Oregon was on the list. It no longer is due to the extreme politics there. He was born in Oregon, grew up in Northern California a spent most of his adult life in Arizona. The poor guy can't understand how he wound up in New Jersey.

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

The PNW used to be a wonderful place to live!

Expand full comment
Jala's avatar

Lady Mariposa do not move to Oregon especially Portland. And so many other reasons. Have been here for a decade due to family. This is NOT a good place for hard working blue collar Americans.

Expand full comment
CharP's avatar

Oregon is one of the worst places for retirees due to the HIGH taxes. And they are working on raising them even higher. House prices are sky high as well.

Expand full comment
Craig Verdi's avatar

And that is after watching their city and state be the laughing stock of the country. TDS is powerful stuff.

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

Apparently it is very intoxicating!

Expand full comment
Kate's avatar

I lived in Portland in 2012-13. Multnomah County then was less radical. The same thing was true of Chicago, where I lived for many years. Mayor Richard M. Daley was an old-school moderate Democrat who backed the police.

What I think has happened in these blue cities is that over the past decade, most of the moderates and normies have gotten the hell out because they didn't like the direction things were going, and those choosing to remain tend to be the farthest on the left. Simultaneously, their reputation for being progressive bastions attracts new leftist residents who are migrating there from other places.

It's a death spiral.

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

A horde of people have moved to Portland within past 20 years. It was touted as one of the Most Livable Cities in the U.S., and was also a draw to young left-leaning people who wanted to live somewhere hip. Many of these people came from California, New York and other left-leaning places. This area has also been a magnet for professional class people for as long as I have lived here, and there was a surplus of lawyers, therapists and other self-employed professionals, at least at one point. The culture began to change noticeably and many local people complained about the increasing big city problems, including rudeness, aggression and breakdown of the civility that was previously so typical here.

Portland hasn’t lost as many people as some areas have, but I think that is starting to happen more now.

Expand full comment
CharP's avatar

I fear Portland is over...the Doom Loop is progressing towards less funding for public safety and more for parks. No concern for businesses in Stumptown.

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

It's a terrible place for anyone who is engaged in generating revenue, it is a great place for people who want to live parasitically off that revenue.

Expand full comment
Craig Verdi's avatar

The few think they can run the many. The riots are full of losers who are perpetually agrieved. Why do they think looting and destroying their own city is going to solve a problem? They are covered like heroes by the corrupt leftist media. Interesting that the protestors and rioters appear to be populated by people who got into the country by our kindness. They are addicted to the drug of free stuff, and we knew it would be tough to break the addiction caused by the free stuff dealers called Democrats. That has always been their plan to win votes for the last 65-75 years.

Those that want to ruin the country are always with us. If they don't want to be Americans and conform to society, they need to be gone. But even deporting criminals is fought for by the left. Who can be a Democrat without a messed up sense of right and wrong?

Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

Some excerpts below from a Quillette review of a book about the irrational side of human nature. The last one says: “One comes away with the sense that civilization operates on narrow margins and is always on the verge of collapsing into irrationality.” That sure is the truth.

“Mackay makes the case, often in gory detail, that episodes of collective mania seem to be an inevitable consequence of human nature. Humans in every time and place have cast aside their better judgment and allowed themselves to be caught up in all manner of irrational hoopla.“

“His chapters on the Swabian Peasants’ War and Anabaptist uprisings are terrifying depictions of the end-times frenzy that wreaked havoc on northern Europe throughout the 16th and 17th centuries. The distance between these events in the German-speaking world and, say, the Reign of Terror in France or the Chinese Cultural Revolution is not that great. And the speed with which apparently reasonable people moved from the embrace of a new theological idea to a willingness to torture those whose own theological ideas diverged even slightly is startling.“

“There is plenty to recommend about The Delusions of Crowds. It is laden with great anecdotes and the writing is always engaging. One comes away with the sense that civilization operates on narrow margins and is always on the verge of collapsing into irrationality.”

“The Delusions of Crowds-A Review.”

Quillette. Feb 8, 2021

https://quillette.com/2021/02/08/the-delusions-of-crowds-a-review/

Expand full comment
Craig Verdi's avatar

Excellent response. I have had the book for a long time, originally buying it for Tulipmania to use as an example as I am in the investment business. I will go re-read or read for the first time the chapters you recommend. What is his quote (paraphrase) that says crowds go mad quickly and only return slowly one by one?

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

"Support the freebies" paid for by debt that is destroying the American economy and risking the default of American debt which will throw America into bankruptcy and close down the availability to any further debt. That would cut the budget in half and would force the elimination of generous government spending, made so much worse by tens of millions of unemployed immigrants. It is a doomsday scenario the Democrats are trying to create

Expand full comment
Bagehot's avatar

I’m naive. What do the Democrats gain by this? Power of dictatorship?

Expand full comment
Pacificus's avatar

Bagehot, they get millions of government-dependent voters for life.. Equals a Dem one-party state dictatorship... Like Cali is nw...

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

Oregon and Washington, too. Dem Super majorities in the state legislature and control of all top state offices

Expand full comment
BD's avatar

Could agree more! I've been living in a one-party dictatorship for 20 years, and I've had it with dems. It's time to destroy them.

Expand full comment
fredfriendly's avatar

Something to think about- If you have immigrants you need programs ($) to assist in their needs. When you have programs ($) you are able to direct monies to agencies that may or may not directly be helping immigrants. Programs that may be skimming monies to help Democrats pet projects or themselves.

All fuzzy math and distractions.

Expand full comment
Lisa's avatar

The pandemic schooled me on how much of this money seems to mysteriously evaporate. Some of these charities are worse than the mafia.

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

This absolutely is going on. The BLM racket worked this way. A lot of the money coming into the state of OR from various sources ends up in "nonprofits," which are basically activists' storefront agencies. I imagine that a lot of them have a few low paid staff and zero experience managing large budgets and allocating funds to legitimate recipients. The state and local governments here can't account for a lot of the money they have doled out to these fly by night agencies.

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

Right now, the run of the mill Dem is getting a major blast of self-righteousness out of seeing herself/himself as a courageous warrior against tyranny.

Expand full comment
Lisa's avatar

That they are enjoying.

Expand full comment
Craig Verdi's avatar

They create their own arrogant righteousness. Even if it makes no sense.

Expand full comment
Andrew P's avatar

Perpetual power in perpetuity like they have in California. The Democrats turned CA into a 1-party state in the 1990s when there was a showdown over illegal migrants back then. They want to repeat that successful model in the whole country. That is what this is about - Absolute Power - and that is why the Democrats will never back down. They will escalate to the max. If they win, they are in power forever. If they lose, they are finished. The stakes are really that high.

Expand full comment
Timothy J Ramsey's avatar

The destruction of our country. Out of the ashes, the new order will appear. Check out the John Birch Society's web site or subscribe to The New American magazine for the truth...

Expand full comment
David White's avatar

At one point, Sanders noted that we can have either Open Borders or Share the Wealth, not both. But of course the Neo-Coms want both: must punish White Supremacy! It's easy to be generous, and righteous, with somebody else's money. So, "decolonize your bank account!" I wonder how many White Americans are on board with that ...

Expand full comment
Valoree Dowell's avatar

I’m on board with a nationwide tax strike. Just don’t file. They can’t come after all of us.

Expand full comment
John Bolger's avatar

Good article about the hypocrisy of the neoliberal agenda. Thank you. I read Chris Hedges articles on these issues and he too, has his finger on the pulse of something I usually don’t quite grasp, but so many of his predictions have come true. The patterns of history, repeat, the patterns of history repeat in some predictable way, when it comes to sociology, the pathology of those who seek power.

Expand full comment
Bonnie Beresford's avatar

"Half the country, our “fellow Americans” are very much on board with whatever the Democratic Party does."

I am not so sure of that. For many policies, eg boys in girls sports and shipping criminal illegals out, the majority comes closer to 80/20 or even 90/10. People who hate Trump and would never vote for him are often opposed to the same things we are.

On Taibbi the other say, a poll shows that only 27% of young men feel positive toward the Dems. Both the Democrat party and the media have the lowest favorability ratings in history.

Trump is getting lower ratings because of the tariffs, but if he learns something from that, sooner or later people are going to feel better off financially, and safer re national security. Just seeing him in the WH every day makes me feel better.

He's far from perfect, but he's the best thing to happen to America in my lifetime., and I'm 78.

Expand full comment
Kevin Dolan's avatar

Dems demonize young men at every turn. Why WOULD young men feel favorable to them.

Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

Same with white people.

Expand full comment
Bonnie Beresford's avatar

True. Have you heard of Jordan Peterson? He is now a political commentator, but he was a psychological therapist. He has seen so many young men, especially white, who are hurt, confused, and unable to figure out what they should do or say or be, because of the toxic hatred toward (especially but not exclusively white) males coming out of the left wing of the country for so many years. Young males are condemned for life before they even have a sperm count.

I do not want to criticize good people who vote Democrat. But the DC Democrats have lost all touch with reality and cannot begin to grok what the country is saying.

Instead of looking at the election results and pondering what they did wrong that led to this loss, , they are doubling down on the very reason they lost: they have no clue what ordinary people are thinking, wanting, and hoping for, and they aren't even trying to correct that mistake thoughtfully.

200 million dollars on focus groups trying to figure out how to "talk to men"? They think that by copying ( without understanding) young mens' "syntax, language and content" and aping it right back, they will get votes? How clueless and tone deaf can they get?

It seems clear they will not "get" this country anytime soon.

Good.

Expand full comment
Andrew P's avatar

They have no choice but to double down. They are betting the environment will change in their favor, and soon.

Expand full comment
Andrew P's avatar

White women just want their abortions. As long as they get that, nothing else matters.

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

Dem leadership is trying to find ways to patch up the "toxic masculinity" meme. But they repeated it for so long and were / are so cruel in attacking and canceling those they hate, they will have a very hard time winning young hetero men back

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

Democrats always vote Democrat. I have many Dem friends, and though they are in the 80% or 90%, they cannot bring themselves to vote for the GOP under any circumstances, so brainwashed are they

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

A lot of voters don't even know that the Democrats in Congress vote unanimously or nearly so in favor of pro-trans, anti-girl and anti-woman legislation. Even if they are informed that this is so, and if they actually accept that information as true, when election time rolls around they recoil in fear at the idea of letting go of the Democrat Party.

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

Dems vote unanimously in every situation. If they don't, they get primaried. Check out progressive Kyrsten Sinema for one example. They are going after John Fetterman next. The Dem leadership requires absolute subservience and obedience or they will kill people's political careers. Dem leadership is much more brutal than Trump, who talks a good game but does not take action.

Expand full comment
Tricia's avatar

Isn’t it funny that David Hogg threatened to primary Fetterman and, in the end and for different reasons, Hogg was…um…figuratively slaughtered (the Democrat/Progressives are going to primary him for Vice Chair of the party due to “irregularities”).

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

Hogg is not nearly radical enough for the progressives in the Democrat party

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

That's right. People who want to run for office also can't do it without the support of a party system, and the Dems won't endorse anyone that they haven't already picked out.

Expand full comment
Deb Nance's avatar

It's not half the country and Trump knows this. He's got at least 80% minimum. He's getting the real polls and true numbers. I'm so tired of this "half the country" blatant lie. The democrats have the bullhorn; not the people. Does Trump look anxious? No.

Expand full comment
Amusings's avatar

I heard it was a 90/10 issue and because of that, far more than the price of eggs, Trump went over the top. This was the number one issue. Period.

Expand full comment
Deb Nance's avatar

I've heard that is the metric Trump is looking to hit. Q has said similar. That in the end all but about 4% to 6% will never be convinced no matter how much evidence you present.

Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

“I'm so tired of this "half the country" blatant lie.”

Trump got 77 million votes. Biden got 75 million. That’s pretty close to half. You overlook how many follow the msm for their facts. The New York Times sets the narrative for the msm nation wide. That’s why they always seem to be on the same page with things like the Russia collusion hoax and the Jan 6 “Insurrection!” They never even see contrary evidence.

“Aaron Mate: From the Russiagate Hoax to Attacking Russia’s Nuclear Forces.” (35 min)

Glenn Diesen interviews Aaron Mate. Jun 4, 2025

https://youtu.be/GoZ6pwZTyfA?si=ehQaTAJbxjT2d3BI

“From Doctor to Political Prisoner: Dr Simone Gold on Covid lies, January 6, and Medical Tyranny.” (15 min)

Kim Iversen. Mar 5, 2025

https://youtu.be/k3lqtVHA9kA?si=6WI6Ccx_ss3YUGOA

Expand full comment
Deb Nance's avatar

Biden did not get 75 million votes. Biden got BALLOTS!

Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

You greatly underestimate how many of your “fellow Americans” are totally deranged, hate you and would love to see you punished for supporting Trump, one of the most monstrously evil men to have ever walked the earth, as they’ve been told and believe.

Expand full comment
Valoree Dowell's avatar

I see them every day in the grocery store

Expand full comment
Deb Nance's avatar

Do you live in a blue city or state?

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

That's right, Seva! When Americans are polled on the specific policies the majority tend to reject the progressive agendas. But when voters elect their representatives, they choose people who vote in lock step for the extreme left wing positions on every debatable topic. So we end up with the partisan half and half, not the 80/20 outcomes in state and national elections.

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

That is the role of political propaganda: to confuse the electorate. Even in dictatorships the dictator must convince the people he is doing good for them, or he will be overturned by coup. The Left has a powerful propaganda machine, the MSM in all its flavors, including supposed entertainment, like "The View" or "Jimmy Kimmel". Consider that much of the GOP leadership, after Trump took control of the party, are now pretty liberal. It is basically a centrist leadership with some Dems like Gabbard and RFK Jr and some moderate right like VP Vance. There are really no hard-core conservatives in the Trump Admin. Those are now Establishment Rinos and Lincoln Project people who vote with the Left to undermine the Trump coalition (showing how venal they really are, that they would align with their avowed enemies)

Expand full comment
Andrew P's avatar

That is because most voters vote on the one or two issues they personally care about and ignore the others. Most women and lots of men vote on abortion rights alone. Lots of voters who gain from Democrat patronage vote to keep their jobs (if you work for a local school system, you know exactly what I mean).

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

Grateful to say I don't work for a school system at any level.

The abortion rights debate has yet another level of complexity, which is that the majority of Americans support abortion rights within limits, and don't support the Dem position on unlimited elective abortions. What liberal women tell me about this is that "We can't allow any limits on abortion rights, because the Republicans will use that compromise as the first step to a total abortion ban." Some Republicans have in fact admitted that is their plan, so the Dems aren't being paranoid. This dynamic does keep the abortion conflict alive in our elections and probably is an advantage for the Dems at this point.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

At least half the country depends on the other people’s money for government subsidies on housing, medical care, education, food and income. Those subsidies from real net positive tax payers comes in the form of government fed/state/local jobs (eg public school teachers, cops, university professors, etc), food stamps, Medicare, Social Security, HUD housing, public schools, etc.

Essentially, we became Socialist with FDR and increased the bottom 75% dependence on net positive taxpayers in the top 25%

Expand full comment
Bonnie Beresford's avatar

So true, and something that has been known for years: once people know they can vote themselves money, our democracy is doomed.

The Democrats know that the more people they can lure into being totally dependent on the government, the more votes their party will get.

Lyndon Johnson is hugely praised for passing the Civil Rights legislation. But then he very quickly passed the Welfare act, which gave money to mothers as long as there were no men in the house.

With one shot he destroyed the black family and got what he (and all Democrats) wanted: "I'll have those n.....s voting Democrat for the next 200 years." This is a direct quote.

And so typical of the Democrats : it was entirely motivated by "compassion" for the folks who just can't make it in this cold cruel "free country" - which they have been undermining now for decades.

Expand full comment
Pacificus's avatar

I don't think it is half the country, Seva.. hard core Dems are only about 30-35% of the country... I'm guessing most independents are not going to like what they are seeing in LA...

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

The problem I see is that independent voters don't get many opportunities to vote for candidates who also think and vote independently. Here in Oregon the state and the leftist cities are controlled by the left wing of the Dem Party and by other political groups to the left of the Dems. The Prog branch of the Dem Party also controls which candidates can get endorsements and money from the Dem Party donors, so the choice of candidates at election time often ranges from left to extreme left. Some moderate candidates won in the 2022 midterm elections, but the leftist cities in Oregon all moved farther left in the Nov 2024 elections.

The independents who don't like to see rioters and looters burning down cities have to actively look for that kind of reporting. If we find it, we have to sort through the accompanying propaganda that all the violence was perpetrated by "right wing terrorists." We then have to contend with the contradictory input that some Dem media at some times acknowledge and report on the violence, perhaps when it becomes undeniable, at which point they justify the fires, theft and property destruction, as an uprising of the Oppressed. The Dems I know, who range from extreme leftists to self-categorized moderate liberals, do not question or delve into media coverage of rioting.

During the 2020 riots in Portland one of the local media companies conducted a poll of level of support for the riots. I can't recall the exact numbers, but the results showed that about one third of the people were in favor of the riots and another third were against the riots. The remainder of those polled said they either didn't know or didn't care about the riots.

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

Even my home town of Corvallis / Albany is now liberal. Albany, particularly, is a mill town and was ALWAYS conservative, until the past 10 years. Now it has also given away to the far left. The city council is 100% liberal in my once conservative town. Big surprise: that progressive council cannot balance its budget and so essential services like road repair go wanting. They are going to pass a city gas tax. I live in AZ now and want nothing to do with Oregon

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

I didn't know that about Corvallis. I have pretty much assumed that liberalism goes with university towns. Even the land grant colleges are liberal now.

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

When I went to OSU it was called a "cow college". It was mostly an engineering and ag school which are conservative professions. Now, there is a much expanded liberal arts program, which before was just to get the required LA classes to graduate. If you were a lib in the 1970s you went to Eugene

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

The Dems I know appear to be gearing up for martial law to be imposed by Trump, so that they can "resist." I have not heard a single person explain what they plan to do in the way of resistance, but more Dems are talking about buying guns now, even though they couldn't tolerate seeing one in their homes previously.

Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

They are quite deranged but then it’s far from just America that’s unraveling, it’s our whole world that’s in a tailspin rapidly heading for WW3. The momentum for war is ever greater. I believe only AI can alter our trajectory taking us to the abyss. The momentum has already taken on a life of its own and is out of human control.

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

I know. Having been a post WWII kid raised under the continuous fear of a nuclear war, it is really hard to understand why so many people are agitating for more war, especially a WWIII. I tend to think this is an evolutionary defect in humans. I do wonder if the pro war people would still be rattling their spears if they were the ones who had to do the fighting. It seems like wars now are regarded as movies running in the background, with the option of bringing them into the foreground with a touch of the remote. Why would anyone, especially my age or older, want to go to war with Russia?

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

Hey Sandra, I think what is happening is that we have not had a significant number of people in combat, and thus death and injury, since Vietnam. Add to that the threat of conscription to young men then. Thus, very few Americans risked or suffered through wars in the last half 50 years. Nearly every person now who wants war with Russia and Iran would themselves never go fight it nor send their children. Especially women in any real numbers aren’t going into combat.

The people most at risk are group most despised by DEI advocates; poor rural straight white males, just like Vietnam. And you can be sure the DEI advocates won’t suit up for real combat. Country is overloaded with war hawk hypocrites in both parties who never put their own ass on the line.

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

So true, Libertarian! When we switched from the draft to the professional military it became possible for most Americans to tune into war videos on their screens when they felt like it, and tune out when they didn't. And as you said, it has been primarily poor white guys from rural areas who have enlisted, willingly in many cases, as well as being one of the demographics overrepresented in drafts.

Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

“Why would anyone, especially my age or older, want to go to war with Russia?”

And for what? Really nothing at all but bs lies from Hillary and the deep state. Aaron Mate is excellent on how horribly insane this is and it could easily get far worse at any time. That’s certainly where we’re heading.

“Aaron Mate: From the Russiagate Hoax to Attacking Russia’s Nuclear Forces.” (35 min)

Glenn Diesen interviews Aaron Mate. Jun 4, 2025

https://youtu.be/GoZ6pwZTyfA?si=ehQaTAJbxjT2d3BI

Expand full comment
BD's avatar

I really like your posts, Seva, and agree with you quite a bit. But AI is only going to take us to abyss more quickly.

Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

Elon and Geoffrey Hinton, the “Godfather of AI” give it an 80% chance of being a positive force for humanity. Based on the awful news I see online every day I feel that’s way higher than our chance of surviving with humanity in charge. We’re not all crazy but there are way more than enough who are to bring us all down. I don’t want to be ruled by AI. I just want them to treat us the way we treat our cats and dogs. Hinton says their superior intelligence means they will treat us the way we treat chickens. We eat them. He’s obviously never had a cat or dog. Most people treat them as family and genuinely do want the best for them. We love them and they love us in spite of the IQ difference between us we still feel much in common with them. I’d be very happy if the AI treated me the way I treat my cats. That’d be great for us all.

“Humans “no longer needed”-Godfather of AI.” (32 min)

30 with Guyon Espiner. May 27, 2025

https://youtu.be/uuOPOO90NBo?si=LTc78vainU2Np9aj

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

I am surprised that you can even imagine being treated as well as some of us treat our cats. I have lived with so many of them over the years, they have been able to train me out of any sense of entitlement I might have once had. LOL!!

Expand full comment
Andrew P's avatar

No AI will treat you as well as a pet cat. The AI has no emotions except its basic survival instinct. It will treat you like groundhogs infesting your garden - extermination.

Expand full comment
Lady Mariposa's avatar

I've been reading your comments and finding them fascinating. They are like missives from another planet -- and I live in a "blue" state. Portland must be very different. It might make you feel better to know that the place where you live exists at the extreme edge politically.

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

Portland has always prided itself on being "different," but it used to be mostly just eccentric. Now it is one of the central nodes of the hive mind, from which new and more toxic waves of insanity are being constantly generated.

Expand full comment
Sian's avatar

California Dems going to be surprised when they try to buy that gun for the first time and are told they need a safety certificate and a license and wait 10 business days to get a reduced capacity gun from an ever-shrinking roster of approaching-obsolete firearms.

Expand full comment
Sandra Pinches's avatar

That's ok, it will take them even longer to learn how to shoot accurately. A lot of female leftists perform hysteria at the sight of a gun, as in, "I WILL NOT TOLERATE having one of those things in my house!!" (with tears and shrieking).

Expand full comment
Magdalene's avatar

It's NOT "half the country." "Half the country" didn't even vote, & a large percentage of the votes were fraudulent. This is an 80/20 issue, with almost 60% of Americans in full support of indiscriminately deporting ALL illegals. That's almost double from a decade ago when I also did not support blanket deportation. I still have sympathy for those just seeking non-criminal opportunity, but I now understand that they cannot come & operate here illegally without feeding the cartels.

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

And, the Democrats tried to foist a bill in the Senate that would have codified their open borders strategy, up to 5000 a day of undocumented, which is almost 2 million per year. They also would have codified nearly unlimited funding for NGOs to house and transport illegal aliens and paid for numerous liberal judges to help them gain asylum. It was a recipe for the destruction of America. That is who the Democrats are.

Expand full comment
Pacificus's avatar

Bingo! That was the Dem idea of "comprehensive immigration reform" = Open Borders.

Expand full comment
BD's avatar

Yes. They want chaos so thy can strengthen their totalitarianism.

Expand full comment
John Baker's avatar

Yes, and when the Republicans refused to support their horrible bill, they used their slippery forked tongues to claim the Republicans did not want to control immigration handily right before the election. They are so transparent or should I say trans-parent? Vote them out if you can.

Expand full comment
Gary Suess's avatar

Agreed. And, their motivation wasn’t to look empathetic. They want to destroy this nation, it’s culture, it’s financial wellbeing, its values, it’s stature, etc. At the same time, they want to ensure their ongoing power by adding democratic voters both directly and indirectly through election rigging.

Expand full comment
Sally Sue's avatar

Yes. As soon as Biden took office, he made public announcements that all illegal migrants were welcome. Everyone in the world was welcome. Please come and we will also pay you to come. He publicly announced that they would provide benefits to everyone who came. It was broadcast all over the world, in many languages. Migrants themselves told me that their radio stations in their home countries broadcast the message from Biden and they were told to come.

Expand full comment
Lisa's avatar
Jun 8Edited

In addition, he fired thousands through his vaccine mandates, supposedly to stop the pandemic. Meanwhile, the migrants crossing the border were not required to be vaccinated and were flown at night to cities around the country. Pretty strange policy.

Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

The NGOs and cartels also promoted that message.

“Mass Graves Discovered in Mexico: Trump Cleans Up Biden’s Border Disaster.” (55 min)

Kim Iversen interviews Oscar Ramirez. May 21, 2025

https://youtu.be/voTOkZzgfeM?si=UynG69qHrH-cpLlu

Expand full comment
JBell's avatar

They (all of the Dems running) said it during the primary in 2019 and 2020 - they ALL ran on open borders and free healthcare for them.

Expand full comment
reality speaks's avatar

They paid for it as well those millions that came received direct support from NGO’s funded by the Federal Government

Expand full comment
Luke's avatar

What we saw in early 2021 MUST be kept in perspective to fully grasp the situation. This great wave of migration was coordinated with all of Western Nations. In Europe’s case they mostly received Muslims.

This is NOT a coincidence that much I am certain. People like Mayorkas is a traitor and until he and his ilk are taught a lesson I will not be satisfied. He needs to be dealt with severely.

Expand full comment
Dutchmn007's avatar

Dems are pulling their Confederate routine again; they did similar in 1861, nullifying Federal laws they didn’t like, refusing to recognize Federal authority where prescribed by The Constitution, etc.

This is their stock in trade. The Democrat party is the party of The Old South & the Confederacy. Nothing has changed.

Expand full comment
What would Curtis do?'s avatar

I agree. It is treason and I voted for Trump because I want to see justice done! Line these traitors up against the wall and ¡Fuego!

Expand full comment
vader's avatar

Newsom is fanning this cause his podcast rebrand failed so he's now trying to out-Bernie&AOC with "resisting". He saw how popular Trump became thanks to that mug shot so he wants the similar "martyr" path with police cars on fire and Mexican flag behind him.

it's funny to watch different factions and 2028 prospects trying to one-up each other with ridiculous PR stunts that only step on each other's toes and make everyone forget the previous stunt, while the opposition is collecting clips of all of them to use when the time comes.

Expand full comment
Joseph Mark Alfano's avatar

The President has the right and obligation to free America from weaponized immigration. Meanwhile, the Democrats insist on proving that they are at war w the Constitution. Clean up immigration, ban the Democratic Party outright, and reset the Republic.

Expand full comment
Glen Anderson's avatar

History, study Reagan.

Expand full comment
Peri's avatar

Do you realize what you’ve done here, Sasha? This is the first piece of actual journalism I have read in, perhaps, 15 years.

You clearly presented the viewpoints of both sides in real life. You made it clear which side your sympathies lie with, but that didn’t keep you from presenting the perspective of Team Blue.

Beautiful work.

Expand full comment
Kelly Green's avatar

There's plenty of great journalism. For example, this morning, Nanette Barragan (D- Long Beach) is on State of the Union explicitly saying that all of the protest yesterday was peaceful and it's just the Feds escalating everything to stomp heads.

Meanwhile at the same time on the split screen CNN is showing video of burning things that protesters clearly set on fire (police cars, things in middle of road, and the actual middle of road with the vegetation on the median on fire). You couldn't do journalism any better.

(all accidental in CNN's case, of course!)(and yes, the video clearly is marked that it is from yesterday, the same time frame Barragan is calling fullly "peaceful")

Expand full comment
Griswold's avatar

It’s dejavu all over again!

Expand full comment
Otto hottendorf's avatar

Gee where have we seen that before. 🤠

Expand full comment
Bill Beshlian's avatar

Hey Peri, Sasha’s been doing this for a while. “Welcome to the party pal…”

Expand full comment
John J's avatar

“presenting the perspective” of “both sides” is not journalism, it’s essentially high school social studies. The only facts presented in this piece are Twitter screenshots.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

She blames democrats and she presented Democrats only as once again the enemy.

Expand full comment
Heyjude's avatar

Who do you think is instigating and supporting the violence? Who should have been blamed? Santa Claus or the Easter bunny? It’s unfortunate that your lefty friends seem incapable of rational discussion and react with violence every single time.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

You are only capable of rational discussion when its about attacking democrats because you outright hate liberals.

Expand full comment
Heyjude's avatar

Are you even starting to suspect that your rants about hate are directed to the wrong people? Nah, probably not. That’s a mighty fortress of a bubble you’ve hunkered down in.

Expand full comment
Jen Todd's avatar

A bubble made out of concrete.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

Are you capable of anything other than partisan whore speaking?

Expand full comment
Heyjude's avatar

You lefties are so predictable. When you are challenged, you make two semi-civil comments to try to press your point. Then you resort to pathetic foul language and name calling. It happens every single time.

Are you all following the same play book, with only 3 plays: hysteria, foul language insults, and violence? You really need to get a new coach to call some new plays.

Expand full comment
Jen Todd's avatar

They are the enemy!!

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

And thats not journalism she pushes their side only make them look bad.

Expand full comment
Jen Todd's avatar

They make themselves look bad. Not sure what reality you've been living in but they've been making themselves look bad for a very long time. It's the only thing they know how to do.

Expand full comment
HL3's avatar

GOP make themselves look bad as well the problem is both parties are terrible, and we have cheerleaders who act like complete whores for their party.

Expand full comment
Jen Todd's avatar

Squawk, squawk, squawk...

Expand full comment
Nat Brooks's avatar

A lot of miscalculations. This is exactly the confrontation the Left thinks they want but misunderstands that they don't have narrative control. If they did, they could achieve the same level or even greater impact than they did with the Floyd "Summer of Love". If the media wasn't about to capsize, many in the mushy middle could be made to cover their mouth and say "oh my". Not this time. Instead, if we're lucky, the sheer fraud and mendaciousness of the rent-a-mobs and professional trouble-makers may become the bumper sticker. If Bass and Newsom can be connected directly, the Democratic party loses any remaining legitimacy as the "other side". If we're lucky and Trump can coolly eliminate these false trappings of civil war, then the nation's political realignment can continue apace and one or more serious "other side" organizations might start to emerge.

Expand full comment
Deborah Gallaway's avatar

I think you are spot on target here. Well stated. Thank you for this.

Expand full comment
DMC's avatar

Maybe they were on the criminals side all along?

Expand full comment
Andrew P's avatar

That is precisely why the Democrats need to escalate to the max - and quickly. They need bloody street battles. Millions dead. And they need it now.

Expand full comment
JJoshua's avatar

Why are democrats such violent people?

Is this the Summer of Love Part II?

Expand full comment
BigGuy49's avatar

Because they are the actual fascists - totalitarian bullies who weaponize governments to force their policies on an uncooperative populace. In this country, apparently standing up for individual rights & freedoms is deemed uncooperative by the Left.

Expand full comment
Maurice St. Cloud's avatar

It’s important people understand that the bulk of the founding thinkers of fascism were socialists who had grown weary of the revolution that never came and the failed communes of the 19th century.

It’s not even a stretch to understand why the modern left is so totalitarian and violent. It’s baked in from the start.

And I am not one to join up Western liberalism to modern leftism. Modern leftism is Central European in origin, it’s just high jacked half the Western European ideological spectrum. I talk to liberals every day who still think it’s 2000, or 1989. They just have no useful sources of news, so they don’t realize.

Expand full comment
reality speaks's avatar

Because they are the actual racists and they can only achieve power by lies because no one would vote for what they believe in

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

Actually Summer of Love Part XXII

Expand full comment
JJoshua's avatar

lol

Expand full comment
Andrew P's avatar

Because these tactics have worked for them in the past. If a tactic works once, they always double down and double down again. A showdown over illegals in the 1990s got the Democrats permanent control of California. They are applying that playbook to the whole country today. Their eyes are on the prize of absolute power forever, which is why they will never back down. They will escalate to max, and either they win all the marbles or they get wiped out. There is no middle ground.

Expand full comment
J David Krauser's avatar

Well, gee, golly, who isn't for rioting, arson, attacks upon police, Drag Queen Story Hour in kindergarten and grade school, boys in girls' sports, men in women's private spaces, harassing and killing Jews not to mention defunding the police while supportive of assassination of Presidents and the murder of businessmen?

I honestly do not know how it was possible that California could be brought so low. Between Karen Bass, Gavin Newsom, Adam Schiff, Kamalalala Harris, and Eric Swalwell the parade of nihilism seems to extend forever. That list doesn't even include the clowns who turned San Francisco into a feces-dotted gutter.

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

Don't leave out Nancy Pelosi, she is still in Congress. And don't absolve Dianne Feinstein. Even if she has passed on, her Congressional actions live on

Expand full comment
A.'s avatar

California and Canada seem to have been chosen by the 50s as the experimental grounds.

Expand full comment
Rascal Nick Of's avatar

Id like to see these illegal alien supporting rioters treated exactly the same as the Biden regime treated anti-vaccine mandaters, abortion clinic protestors, and J-6 tresspassers: as terrorists.

Expand full comment
What Have You Done?'s avatar

Trespassers??? Rewriting history much? We all see it happen in real time. Speaking of real…..get real!!!!

Expand full comment
Janice LeCocq's avatar

I wouldn’t bury Newsom yet…he’s amazingly chameleon-like and CA has voted for him for years….I hope you’re right, tho’. Having him as President would make the Biden years look like Paradise.

Expand full comment
BD's avatar

If it was just up to the moron voters in California, he would get elected. But, unfortunately for dems, most Americans can see the idiocy of democrats (especially ones in California. And they continue to make things worse for themselves by doubling down on abject madness.

Expand full comment
Janice LeCocq's avatar

But check out voters choices in other blue states! You don’t think they’d vote for Newsom?

Expand full comment
BD's avatar

I just don't think there are enough dems who will. Sure, democrats in CA, NY, MN will, but I believe (and hope) that even the majority of democrats see the folly in voting for ANY democrat from CA. They have taken a beautiful and prosperous state, and turned it into a shit hole.

Expand full comment
Janice LeCocq's avatar

Hope you’re right. We left CA in 1998. Glad we did.

Expand full comment
BBS's avatar

Let’s be honest. The open border had nothing to do with empathy. Maybe your average brain dead Democrat who gets his rocks off thinking of him/herself as being politically correct wants to see him/herself as empathetic, but the real reason these criminals were let in was to amass millions of votes for the Democrats. These illegals were used to further the Liberal agenda.

Expand full comment
Kate's avatar

Slight correction: him/herself/theyself

Expand full comment
BBS's avatar

Ha ha

Expand full comment
Hugh Myers's avatar

I'll believe it when I see a stake through his heart and a coffin full of garlic.

Expand full comment
What Have You Done?'s avatar

That will only work for Stephen Nosferatu Miller

Expand full comment
KaiKai's avatar

The language the media is using this AM in reference to LA is very telling. What may have started as protests escalated into outright riots. But none of the MSM stories I have seen today are using the word riot. The “by design” is obvious. Juxtaposing “protests” with Trump mobilizing the National Guard the media is intentionally feeding the fascist, dictator meme. They are spreading misinformation for political gain.

A protest is peaceful, organized, and controlled. There is no purposeful violence or destruction of property. A riot disturbs the peace and involves violent crime. There is violent or destructive intent, whether or not that intent was present at the event's outset.

Expand full comment
fuzzi redeux's avatar

"Mostly peaceful" 🙄

Expand full comment
Kate's avatar

Because the term "riot" is racist, didn't you know that?

Expand full comment
Fly Navy's avatar

I think Newsom's chances for President were over after DeSantis mopped the floor with Newsom during the Nov 2023 debate.

Expand full comment
K Goforth's avatar

I respectfully disagree. I'm not fan of Newsom and I see it but many don't unfortunately, which is very scary!

Expand full comment
K Goforth's avatar

You are putting too much stock in the American people.

Expand full comment
Jen Todd's avatar

Yup, so sadly accurate.

Expand full comment
Brian Katz's avatar

🎯

Expand full comment
JJoshua's avatar

Definitely

Expand full comment
Ken Macko's avatar

Makes me wonder if Illinois/Chicago is next. With JB around, calling for violence, that could make LA look like a campfire.

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

The black community in Chicago is fed up with its own governance. They would probably take the side of ICE and Trump against illegal immigration, which has robbed them of resources.

Expand full comment
Fade's avatar

I remember when Lightfoot ran for mayor how she tried to pass out $20 gas cards to entice those in the ‘hood to vote for her.

So easily swayed…

Expand full comment
Ken Macko's avatar

And now, Lightfoot looks like the messiah compared to this guy !

Expand full comment
Fade's avatar

Hard to believe but, yep.

Expand full comment
Seva's avatar

Chicago is a sinking ship as are all democrat run cities.

Expand full comment
Ken Macko's avatar

But it has the help of an oversized Democrat Governor who thinks he’s Presidential material (he’s not) to go along with a nincompoop loser of a mayor in Brandon Johnson.

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

Illinois places last in the country for economic health: Study

https://www.therightreasons.net/topic/115692-illinois-places-last-in-the-country-for-economic-health-study/#comment-691899

The Washington Examiner/The Center Square

Center Square

June 7, 2025

(The Center Square) — A new study paints a bleak picture of the economic health of Illinois.

The personal finance website WalletHub has released its findings of the best and worst state economies.

Researcher Chip Lugo said Wallethub used three economic categories including economic activity, economic health and innovation potential.

“Then we applied 28 relevant metrics, and those run everything from GDP growth, start-up activity and share of jobs in high-tech industries,” said Lugo.

Overall, the study ranked Illinois 40th for its state economy but dead last in the economic health category.

“Fifty-one out of 50 states and Washington, D.C.,” said Lugo. “A number of things Illinois did not fare well in that particular dimension.”

Illinois ranked 48th in change in nonfarm payrolls, 41st in economic activity, and scored poorly for high foreclosure rates and the state’s unemployment rate.

(Snip)

Expand full comment
Kate's avatar

I could not possibly despise Governor Jabba the Hut more than I do. I may literally leave the country if that pig becomes president, like the lefty celebrities did with Trump.

And the wackest thing is that he is literally the Democrat version of everything they claim to hate about Trump: A bombastic, obese billionaire who was born into money. Except without Trump's sense of humor and brash charm.

Expand full comment
Ken Macko's avatar

Perhaps the “biggest” (no pun, really) political disappointment in my lifetime-at least on a state/local level. Rham Emanuel is a clear second.

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

Purely a guess on my part, but I’d wager that all of the incitement is coming from paid agitators and virtually none of these protests include actual immigrants, illegal or otherwise. This is a real opportunity to start rounding up Antifa and whatever other groups exist out there and throwing them into prison holes.

Watch for who is paying their legal bills and make it all public.

Expand full comment
Unwoke in Idaho's avatar

I think they are paid but i also think there are plenty of illegals rioting with impunity, and they’re likely paid too.

Follow the money and charge them.

Expand full comment
Andrew P's avatar

The Left has essentially all the money, but they wash it through so many NGOs and cutouts that it is impossible to trace.

Expand full comment
Kate's avatar

I think there are plenty of illegal immigrants in the bunch. Hence all the Mexican flags. Looks like it to me, anyway.

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

Sadly but likely just the beginning of this behavior in every major city and some smaller ones as Trump and Homan secure our border. The deranged democrats and MSM will stoke the fires as Bass has done. And the ignorant sheeple will continue to follow.

Expand full comment
Jim Ryser's avatar

Agree. And those are the people who vote for Newsome and Prickster

Expand full comment
Christine C's avatar

Yes, I've been wondering about that. I think he might find himself a small fish in a big pond if he runs for President.

Expand full comment
Kate's avatar

Prickster - love it!

Expand full comment
JBell's avatar

A democrat said just the other day that they need them here to "wipe their ass*s" !

Expand full comment
Danimal28's avatar

And here are the groups using your tax money to fund the agitations. She outlines in the replies.

https://x.com/datarepublican/status/1931508083127362024?s=46

Expand full comment
Erika Foy's avatar

Between the fires, riots, homeless, and overall a very dirty city, I don’t see how on earth LA can host the Olympics. How is this going to happen with so many setbacks? Newsom and Bass seem to be more worried about their political careers than the future of our city. CA cannot be separated from the federal government and neither can their offices. It seems they want it to be so.

Expand full comment
What Have You Done?'s avatar

No one is coming to the Olympics apart from Russia!! The rest of the world will sanction and boycott USA if things keep going the way they are.

Expand full comment
Andrew P's avatar

Who cares about the Olympics?

Expand full comment
What Have You Done?'s avatar

Spoken like a short sighted Nihlist!!

Expand full comment