120 Comments
User's avatar
Brian DeLeon's avatar

Amazing how when the shoe is on the other foot, suddenly it’s government censorship. Hypocrisy indeed. And who cares about Jimmy Kimmel? He was a real douchebag.

Expand full comment
Amy Kennedy's avatar

This!! The networks have been a propaganda machine for the dems for years and now it’s a problem?!?

Expand full comment
Donald C. Bryan's avatar

To be clear, this was a monetary decision by ABC - same as it was by CBS when they decided to end Colbert's contract. Kimmel is at least as expensive as Colbert, and he was losing at least as much money. He just happened to hand ABC a big fat excuse to cut their losses by opening his big fat mouth for the millionth offensive time.

boofreakinhoo, Jimmy.

Expand full comment
Suzanne-Marie English's avatar

Exactly! And loved your “boofreakinhoo, Jimmy.”🎯💥💪🏼

Expand full comment
Jennifer James's avatar

Thank goodness his “big fat mouth” is now silent!

Expand full comment
Michael Framson's avatar

Kimmel's disgusting mouth led me to want him tar and feathered. He went after parents who declined vaccines for their children by exercising the medical ethical principle of informed consent. They declined and that was too much for Jimmy "the monster" Kimmel.

Key events from 2015 include:

February 2015: In response to a measles outbreak, Kimmel dedicated a monologue to criticizing anti-vaccination parents, noting that in some schools in Los Angeles, "parents here are more afraid of gluten than they are of smallpox". He also mocked celebrities like Jenny McCarthy who spread misinformation about vaccines.

February 27, 2015: His show featured a segment in which real doctors recorded a profane public service announcement urging people to vaccinate their children.

March 2015: Kimmel responded to backlash from the anti-vaccination community by airing a satirical "child's right to choose" segment, in which he and his crew pretended to survey children on whether they wanted a vaccination shot.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

And I don’t believe anything Fire said. They can spin it that way to get the reaction they want. What if that’s not how it happened at all? What if the government didn’t pressure them, but the public pressured the stations? That’s free market, not censorship.

I’m tired of these made up stories where some convo took place with someone in the government and it’s twisted out of proportion or unfair assumptions are made, and reported on falsely just to get us all upset.

Expand full comment
Bernadette's avatar

Jimmy Kimmel has free speech, and ABC has the freedom to terminate him. No one is "canceling" him but his employer and his fiduciaries. He is free to be hired again, he has not been de-banked, and he has not been cast out into the darkness. If his ratings were good he'd likely still be employed. He is ultimately the victim of his own lack of comedic talent, IMO

Expand full comment
jabster's avatar

More succinctly, Jimmy Kimmel has free speech, including keeping his mouth shut, and ABC has free speech, including keeping their electronic mouth shut.

Freedom of contract FTW!

Expand full comment
Patricia Taylor's avatar

I hope you are ready, emotionally, to have the government take away your free speech. Because, once they start taking it, they don’t stop.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

Sort of like the Biden years right? That was the MOST censorship I’ve ever witnessed in my entire 60 years. And nobody is limiting free speech today. 🙄

Expand full comment
KAM's avatar

Free speech is never absolute. We try to find the line. As much freedom as possible. As much order as necessary. It’s always contingent.

Celebrating murder is not OK. I’ll live with pressure to do better.

Expand full comment
Lynette's avatar

Celebrating a death by assassination broke a basic moral code. I hope TPUSA and Erika Kirk still sue these evil liars like a Democrat.

Expand full comment
Patricia Taylor's avatar

I am surprised by how much anger and mean words that Christians use against Democrats.

Expand full comment
Lynette's avatar

Are all Democrats sociopaths, or are all sociopaths Democrats?

Expand full comment
jabster's avatar
3hEdited

Celebrating murder is OK from a 1A standpoint, but not a personal decency standpoint.

The 1A recognizes the right of everyone to be an asshole (or a sicko) by what they say.

I don't think the Mouse likes assholes working for them.

https://www.amazon.com/Asshole-Rule-Civilized-Workplace-Surviving/dp/1600245854

Expand full comment
Jeff Keener's avatar

The good news is that Kimmel is available to help our farmers bring in the last of the fruit and vegetables. Fresh air, productive work, and a break from the poison he trafficks would do him a world of good. He can come back stronger and better than ever.

Expand full comment
Patricia Taylor's avatar

Oh, I see. You think Jimmy K. Would be good at farming because he’s Mexican. Do you really think God believes that Mexicans are only good at farming? I just wondered.

Expand full comment
Formerly_Known_As_Someone's avatar

Wikipedia says he’s German and Italian.

Expand full comment
Jeff Keener's avatar

🙄What a strange thing to wonder about. I don't think any of those things that you think I think. Here's what I think: I think Kimmel would be a lousy farmer, but I think it would do him some good to work with a picking crew for a bit and take a break from his current tawdry life and experience something real. Doesn't require too much skill or knowledge to pick squash or pumpkins.

Expand full comment
Dena's avatar

Jimmy Kimmel is Mexican? Who cares.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

🤣 I couldn’t tell, I don’t even know if that’s true, but ol Patricia sure is trolling as hard as she can all over these comments trying to stoke discord. 🤣 so obvious

Expand full comment
Janet Merran's avatar

Don’t forget what happened to Roseanne Barr

Expand full comment
BD's avatar

Yes, and she was fired, not because of Obama, but because of Obama's dumb ass girlfriend.

Expand full comment
Patricia Taylor's avatar

It still surprises me how people can always find a way to blame Obama for anything they disapprove of.

~~Do Christians really think Jesus would be ok with people judging others cause of their skin color?

Expand full comment
BD's avatar
1hEdited

Brilliant deduction. Obama=skin color. So why not raise the racist flag? Huh? You don't even understand the comment so you regress to the old racist mantra. Nice job. BTW, I don't judge Obama on his skin color. The leftist America he's helped create is reason enough to judge him as a failed President.

Expand full comment
Michael Pergola's avatar

Antifa designated a terrorist organization.

Now we’re talking !!!!

Expand full comment
Patricia Taylor's avatar

We’ll end up like Nazi Germany. Is that ok with Christians?

Expand full comment
Michael Pergola's avatar

What a stupid thing to say . America defeated Nazi Germany, dimwit .

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

They have a hyper-fixation with “Christians” in almost every reply they post. LOL truest sign of a propaganda troll. Wonder if she has hairy feet too

Expand full comment
Ruth H's avatar

Karma is sweet. Kimmel was an egotistical ignorant POS. The left set up these rules and did all they could to debunk, censor, lawfare, accuse, and destroy we the ‘deplorables.’ We finally are playing by their rules in a very limited way, as we never want to repeat every atrocious action they thought was ok.

Expand full comment
Kurt's avatar

Another Trump masterful play--put Disney in the position of defending a money-losing clown who is not funny.

This is not a free speech issue. There are plenty more democrat jackels in the media.

Expand full comment
Barbara Bergin's avatar

I agree 100%, and have written such to Trump, Vance and my representatives. We must let our voices be heard, especially since right now, we should not have fear of government retribution. However, I do believe private entities should be allowed to fire people based on their public behaviors. As a previous business owner, I would have fired an employee for public immorality, be they left or right. If it did not represent what I wanted to convey to the public, I should have every right to can someone behaving badly, whether they say, "I'm happy Charlie Kirk is dead," or something homophobic. But as a private business owner, I did not have someone else's wealth bouying me up with financial support, as do the legacy media institutions. I have only the income generated directly from customers. Kimmel and others should have been gone a long time ago, but they were financially supported. It was time for him to go. No matter when that was, the left would blame the administration for suppression of free speech.

Expand full comment
Patricia Taylor's avatar

But what if GOP loses elections in 2028? What if new Leftie leaders want to fire people for being Christians?

Expand full comment
Gary W.'s avatar
3hEdited

I remember when the Democrats were in power and Sen. Chuck Schumer gave a speech strongly encouraging FOX to not allow anymore Tucker segments on J6. And of course they dropped Tucker not long after, when he had high ratings, unlike Kimmel.

Expand full comment
Tom from WNY's avatar

Same happened to Glen Beck after Soros met with Murdoch. Bye-bye!

Expand full comment
david's avatar

It’s a business, with his terrible ratings they were probably looking for a reason to get rid of him. He provided them an easy out.

Expand full comment
Jennifer James's avatar

Late night killed funny…which jimmy Kimmel helped happen!

Expand full comment
Petey Kay's avatar

It’s a good outcome. No more Mr. Nice Guy. F em.

Expand full comment
Patricia Taylor's avatar

Do you think Jesus is ok with the “F em” treatment of our fellow humans?

Expand full comment
ReadingRainbow's avatar

It used to be illegal for network news to blatantly lie. Obama repealed that law. Jimmy Kimmel saying the shooter was a MAGA Republican was straight up disinformation.

What would they have done to Jimmy if he had told his audience not to take the Covid vax? Would he have even made it on the air?

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar
4hEdited

While the market is an efficient way to make decisions about what should live or die, it is not necessarily moral. If this country ever becomes more than 50% "immoral" as at least 25% are today (justifying assassination to get rid of political opponents) then I am not sure "free speech" will matter any longer. It is difficult to apply tests of morality to speech, so let's hope we never need to do so. The FCC has long had a role in pushing the public interest, which includes public decency

Expand full comment
Mick's avatar

Your point about the FCC is spot on. The FCC grants a license to broadcast over the airwaves to ABC and it's granting of that license does have some limitations.

Expand full comment
Paul Scofield's avatar

The First Amendment talks about "Congress" making no law abridging the freedom of speech. That does not mean that the consequences of shooting one's mouth off in the private sector are protected. If you have legitimate citations and proof of the Trump administration coercing ABC (or others) to can employees (like a written EO sent along to the FCC), you might want to post the URL. Otherwise it is just talk.

Given the wholesale media-led assault on American citizens' and President Trump's constitutional rights both before and during the FJB interregnum, I think it is convenient for the self-same to now cast themselves as the aggrieved and the defenders of 1A. To hell with that. Both the MSM and the American Left writ large have permanently lost any claim to being anyone's moral betters.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

THIS!

Expand full comment