285 Comments
User's avatar
john Phillip's avatar

Well Sasha I think you are hitting your stride. Run with it!!

Kurt's avatar

Sasha, great piece. So many extended clips buttress your clear analysis. Thank you for your compelling arguments and incredible effort. You are the best.

Kelly Green's avatar

The 2008 angle is a bad analysis. The change was the onset of social media, and the role of the internet in damaging traditional media. Social media had several effects:

1) drove first the left more left and then the right more right by creating self-reinforcing online echo chambers, especially initially among left leaning members of our media

2) caused those left leaning media folks to go so far left that they had growing gaps with mainstream America's thinking

3) echo chamber amplified by algorithms made them say false things outright, embellish, and take further out positions

4) social media, though, enabled candidates, and really all citizens, to speak directly to the public, and successfully falsify those media narratives

5) further-right folks could now also create their own embellished narratives and had more ability to get heard by their own side through greater connectivity and by algorithm driven content feeds

Essentially, social media and the internet killed the bipartisan control of the national narrative, which killed the elite's control of everyone and everything.

Everything since then is a form of the elites trying to claim that power back. When they can't get it using their old methods, they need to cancel candidates with superdelegates (Bernie), they need to try impeachments, Russiagate narratives, lawfare, social media censorship and (overseas) banning political parties (Germanyt) and using censorship (UK, Germany, Brazil) and lawfare (Brazil) more successfully.

Technology-driven change caused a change that, with the election of Trump in 2024, is essentially purer democracy in action. But the elites never wanted democracy really, and they never actually knew what it meant or would result in when they spoke about it.

Mike Herzog's avatar

uh, we are a republic, not a democracy. Try reading the Constitution before positing theories of social decline. The Left is always the root of destruction because they can never figure out how to play by 'rules'. See history

Kelly Green's avatar

I most certainly did not say otherwise. Saying a given election is more or less democratic within a constitutional republic is not saying it IS a pure democracy.

I used it in sense 1(a) below, your straw man is that I claimed sense 1(b) when it's plain from context that's nowhere near the case.

democracy

noun

1. : government by the people : rule of the majority

a) **********a form of government in which the people elect representatives to make decisions, policies, laws, etc. according to law*******************

b) a form of government in which the people vote directly against or in favor of decisions, policies, laws, etc.; also called a direct democracy or pure democracy

Mike Petrik's avatar

A republic is an indirect democracy. There has not been a true direct democracy since ancient Athens, but carry on.

Bill Bowers's avatar

Which has never proved sustainable, hence the compromise representative democracy.

Mike Petrik's avatar

Exactly, which is why when people say democracy they almost invariably mean indirect or representative democracy, except for those who think everyone else is so ignorant they need reminding that we are a republic.

Neil Ringlee's avatar

That seemingly innocent distraction is by design. Compare curricula prior to and post 1975 in most public schools and you see the content stripped away. Who reads The Federalist today below the graduate school level?

User's avatar
Comment removed
Nov 18, 2025
Comment removed
Kelly Green's avatar

I would agree with you about the lesser ability to steal our republic from the people. Turkey fought off a military coup in 2016 in exactly this way. Armed citizens (and armed police) took to the streets and said no.

I think Euromaidan is the most likely form of attempted revolution here, but I agree it can't happen here. In Ukraine there was also the aspect that they had much stronger regional cultural and political concentration. You could draw a line roughly where the front lines are now and separate the country into spheres by both language spoken and political party support. So when the eastern forces took over the gov't and turned things eastward, the west-supporting faction that was the far majority in the capital city could take over the seat of gov't. But, of course, instantly Crimea and Donbas became a different country effectively, too.

So the question becomes, yes, you'll have your freedom in Texas and Florida, but are you going to march on New York City or just leave it to the other side?

History shows, by the way, that there is little blood shed in civil wars or rebellions when the average age of the population is >38, and we're like at 45 or something. That makes a simple walk-away split much more likely, too.

Kelly Green's avatar

Donald's skill isn't endearing, really. It's just a learned skill from using the tabloids to become famous in NYC in the 80's and 90's. He learned how to push the buttons to get written about, just like he was spending time in the wrestling ring learning how to play the heel. What he didn't know when he was learning it was how technology would shift to make that skill ideal for charting a path to the Oval Office.

michael holt's avatar

Hey Sasha, slight correction: it's not JoJofromJurz, but…Jurzee. Not a biggy, just a word of advice. Carry on, sweetie!😊

NWCitizen's avatar

So why is Stone rehashing the past? Is she trying to avoid saying anything about the Epstein files or Trump's murderous spree in Venezuela?

I wouldn't worry about the Epstein files; Trump can't do anything vile enough to make his cult turn against him.

Reporters have interviewed the families of people Trump has killed in villages in Venezuela. Most are impoverished fisherman who occasionally run drugs to make a little extra money. They are the lowest of the low in Trump's "drug cartel." Also most fentanyl come in by land from Mexico. These boats are running cocaine destined for Europe. And if there is a market for fentanyl in the US, the drug cartels will find a way to get it here. I don't think a useless, once sided war with Venezuela is going to help him get the Nobel Peace Prize.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-venezuela-boat-strikes-drugs-cocaine-trafficking-95b54a3a5efec74f12f82396a79617ea

234's avatar

Why are you so hell bent on looking for something vile on Trump?

Don't you think if he molested one single girl Rachel Maddow would have made this victim an international celebrity long ago?

How does it fell waking up every morning in your world full of hate....for just one man?

NWCitizen's avatar

He has multiple charges of sexual assault which the right totally ignored and everything he does is to benefit himself and his billionaire buddies.

Joe Luciano's avatar

You are the exact person Sasha is talking about. Living in the past with your hate. Quoting Dem talking points about only representing billionaire buddies. He's obviously helped the working class in this country much more than Biden ever did. You are just like a southerner from the 1800's who supported Jim Crow laws......

NWCitizen's avatar

Trump has only gotten worse since his first term. He wants to throw millions off health care, ruined markets for farmers & others with his tariffs, is invading cities and wants to use them for military training. (With black hawk helicopters) , wants to shut down networks & anyone who speaks out against him, indiscriminately grabbing black & brown people off the streets thanks to the white supremacist s. Miller & holding them for weeks even in a mistake, and he is surrounded by incompetent sycophants (like hegsick).

234's avatar

Multiple? if there are these are gold diggers (can you name one of these women?) If you accidentally brush up against me I can accuse you of sexual assault.

The only case found against him IN CIVIL COURT was by E Jean Carrol, another gold digger who has previously accused 6 other men of the same.

That verdict, on appeal, was found in a heavily TDS-inflicted area of NY.....like expecting Emitt Till to get a fair trial in 1935 rural Mississippi.

Kelly Green's avatar

I wonder if impoverished fishermen who run drugs just to make a little extra cash think about it in the same terms when it carries a possible death sentence? I like the approach as it can't hurt anything. It's justified by the fleeing felon use of force doctrine, to me. People will suffer great harm if the boats get through. That justifies use of deadly force if it's hard to catch them.

Jen Todd's avatar

This is a great atricle from Chris Bray about those drug boats from a former Navy guy involved in those kinds of operations.

https://open.substack.com/pub/cdrsalamander/p/a-drug-war-goes-hot?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=qs409

Pete's avatar

This comment deserves a gold medal in whataboutism.

Bill Dannenmaier's avatar

My whole family is happy the US Navy is slaughtering criminals bringing fentanyl to our streets. I worked in hospital ER's for forty years. The democrat party did nothing to stop the influx of this scourge. Biden welcomed illegal immigration, probably democrats figured they would harvest votes... "impoverished fishermen who occasionally run drugs"....drugs that kill our fellow citizens...Please! we lose no sleep over these criminals...

NWCitizen's avatar

Except Trump is lying about fentanyl. Venezuela is known for cocaine, most fentanyl come in overland from Mexico. Venezuela wants to take over the oil rich region of Guyana called Essequibo which is the main reason for the US taking an interest in Venezuela and staging a deadly "theatre" off it's coast.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 19, 2025
Comment deleted
Tom Paine's avatar

Agreed just another brainwashed

lib making excuses for criminals.

NWCitizen's avatar

Except they are running cocaine bound for Europe. Mostly fentanyl comes overland from Mexico

Walter Stock's avatar

My god that guy sounds exactly like “Professor Galloway”

Dutchmn007's avatar

Don’t forget that Granny Mao Jackets referred to half the country as a “basket of deplorables”. Biden followed that up with calling the same half “garbage”.

michael holt's avatar

Don't forget the “bitter clingers” to their guns and Bibles. That was pure Obama.

Ripple's avatar

The funny thing is, he was speaking about Democrat primary voters who favored Hillary, not Republicans.

Rather Curmudgeonly's avatar

Much as the 2020 Kamala Harris implosion blamed racism and misogyny - in the Democratic primaries.

NWCitizen's avatar

And now Fuentes and his groypers are given a platform on Tucker Carlson.

Rather Curmudgeonly's avatar

I don't get the fear of this guy and his message. Is everyone afraid of how persuasive he is? You can't actually refute what he says? What is it?

NWCitizen's avatar

I can't repute what a vulgar, antisemitic misogynist says? You could read Stones article "The NY Times glorifies Nick Fuentes" to find out what's wrong with him.

https://www.sashastone.com/p/the-nyt-glorifies-nick-fuentes?utm_campaign=posts-open-in-app&triedRedirect=true.

Paul137's avatar

Useful clarification, Ripple. I either never knew that or had forgotten ...

grad's avatar

Dates, they still mean something.

Michael O's avatar

In the next few months, we will witness how clingy the Venezuelan Maduro is to power. He has a choice. Move his entire circle to Havana or Moscow (and take all the Cuban KGB advisers in Caracas with him) or cling to power and die. That authoritarian clinging instinct is very powerful.

Here's also. Woke is not dead. It's clingy in the West.

NWCitizen's avatar

Don't forget that Trump calls democrats "the enemy within", "radical leftwing lunatics", and said, "We pledge to you that we will root out the communists, Marxists, fascists, and the radical left thugs that live like VERMIN within the confines of our country."

Tom Paine's avatar

You are all of that brainwashed lefties are a cancer on society.

Ron Goodman's avatar

Actually, she never said that. She was referring to about half of the Trump voters, not the country as a whole.

rural counsel's avatar

A distinction without a difference.

Ron Goodman's avatar

“You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?” Clinton said. “The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic—you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up.”

Roger Beal's avatar

That remark from Hillaroid is what fundamental transformation was based on.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Nov 18, 2025
Comment removed
NWCitizen's avatar

Fuentes is back with his vulgarity! Is that your favorite word?

danbfas's avatar

Oh, well, that's ok then. Only 40 million Americans if they didn't vote for Hillary? No problem.

Ron Goodman's avatar

Why lie. She was referring to about half of the Trump voters, not half the country. As far as I an see, she nailed it.

Ichabod Kunkleberry's avatar

You forgot to mention the "little people".

Joe Esposito's avatar

The civil war is happening in our democrat cities when they attack Federal ICE agents carrying out the laws that congress passed on illegal immigration.

When the Democrat Leftist elevated to sainthood

George “the thug” Floyd and murdered 12 people, attacked the White House, set fire to the president's church and caused 3 billion dollars in property damage.

The Russian collusion hoax, Hunter Biden’s laptop, the phony January 6 committee and many more civil disorders set up by the Plantation Democrats.

To all you folks who are against gun ownership you best rethink your naive thought process.

When these Leftist Pigs get back into power they will be coming for the people like yourself and they will show no mercy.

Carl L. McWilliams's avatar

Don't forget Barack Hussein Obama, Kamala Harris, Valerie Jarrett and Pete Buttigieg are all the children of Communists.

I posit BHO and Valerie Jarrett (and continuing under four years of O'Biden's Administration), have engaged in "asymmetric warfare" - and BHO/Jarrett have embedded the DEEP STATE with Marxists/Socialists who are "down for the revolution". Our enemies are determined. They are relentless. They have a plan and are executing it every day.

A hot civil war between red and blue states is not an impossibility.

KEVIN PEARSON's avatar

Valerie Jarett was born in Iran.

She is clearly his handler

Carl L. McWilliams's avatar

Yes, you are correct: Valerie Jarrett was born on November 14, 1956, in Shiraz, Iran, to American parents, James E. Bowman and Barbara T. Bowman. Her father was a pathologist and geneticist working in Iran at the time of her birth. The family lived in Iran for several years before moving to London and later settling in Chicago in 1962 or 1963.

Moreover, Valerie Jarrett's parents and other close family members were under investigation by the FBI due to suspected communist insurgent ties. Her father, Dr. James E. Bowman, a pathologist and geneticist, had extensive ties to communist associations and individuals. FBI files show he communicated with Alfred Stern, a paid Soviet agent, and was a member of the Association of Internes and Medical Students, which the FBI considered a communist-insurgent group. The FBI investigated him for these affiliations. Her maternal grandfather, Robert Rochon Taylor, was also under FBI scrutiny for his business partnership with Alfred Stern and involvement with communist groups. Her father-in-law, Vernon Jarrett, appeared on the FBI’s Security Index and was considered a potential communist saboteur.

KEVIN PEARSON's avatar

Which is why we must make sure they never do

Roger Beal's avatar

And the Trump impeachment hearings they will launch ... beyond counting.

D Parker's avatar

My concern is that like a magician, the Violent left is trying to distract from the real issues at stake.

Dredging up a very old canard that this is Communism versus Fascism – when both of those leftists, collectivist ideologies are just evil twins.

The true conflict is between Economic Freedom and Socialistic slavery, Good versus Evil.

TWC's avatar

Authoritarianism vs Freedom.

Carl L. McWilliams's avatar

Hello, my wife Karen and I live in the banana republic of Colorado, where I am a 77 year old self-employed sociologist and serial entrepreneur. In 2021, during the Covid-19 scam, I prepared this Google Document for Colorado Governor Jared Polis titled, "Economic Freedom VS. Marxist Socialism - it was subsequently ignored by the Democrat governor. (three minute read)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WH6ZRRip5TotRaU45iOCfALmDQvO_6jk659XiWvqLFg/edit?usp=sharing

R H's avatar

Excellent piece! Rush Limbaugh coined the phrase "Womb to the Tomb" to succinctly describe Big Government's end goal.

Lady Mariposa's avatar

Worse. Totalitarianism vs. Freedom.

Brian M's avatar

I could argue that every instance of Marxism adopted on the planet was just another example of fascism. Fascists do not have to be Marxists, but Marxists have to be fascists. It is really simple. No leader has ever forced unnatural Marxism down the throats of his countrymen without resorting to fascist (nationalist totalitarian with centralized government military controls) techniques. Mussolini was a Marxist. Hitler was as well, though he denied it (ego too big to acknowledge the teaching of his Jewish German predecessor). Mao was both a Marxist and a fascist as was Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot, Castro and Maduro. Xi is a quasi-Marxist but all in on fascism as is Putin (modern Marxists have acknowledged the limitations of sharing wealth equally, and want to be elites themselves).

Roger Beal's avatar

See Jonah Goldberg's 2007 book, "Liberal Fascism", for detailed cross-cultural and historically-accurate support of your comments.

Jorge Finkielman's avatar

Great episode Sasha. Bringing those events from our recent past manage to shine an intense light of today’s event. We are living the consequences of things mainstream media is incapable to present now.

X7C00 (Timothy Hargadon)'s avatar

The party of slavery, of the Confederacy, of both iterations of the KKK, of Jim Crow, of segregation, of dilapidated shit hole cities, of open borders, of the sterilization of children, of failed schools, of riots and assassinations, and of total institutional control would like to correct some of your mischaracterizations.

Steenroid's avatar

I used to enjoy Ken Burns work until I realized what a guilty racist he was. He never grew up in and with any black kids. Never played ball with them and wondered why they had to go to school 23 miles from where we lived. It was fun and good when they started coming to our school. We could all play ball on our schools teams.

Judy Harper's avatar

You are so right. I grew up in Louisiana. A lot of kids were raised by black “maids”. We hugged them, went to their houses and churches. I rarely heard the N word. Ken burns revulsion is something I’ve never seen or felt. When I was growing up interracial marriage was still taboo but now it is common and accepted in most classes. I can’t think of any of my friends who don’t have some interracial marriage in their families. Obama really divided the races. My older black friends warn me that some of the black youth are “messed up”. I have a friend in her 40’s who has a masters degree, great job and family but still feels oppressed. I tried to understand but now I’m just worn out with it. Another decisive thing Obama did was light up the White House when the right to gay marriage was passed. This showed incredible intensity to half of the country. It’s supposed to be the People’s House. Thank you Sasha!!

NWCitizen's avatar

Domestic work was the only job black women could get in the south which is why kids were raised by black "maids." Were blacks subject to Jim Crow laws in Louisiana? I think that was a result of "revulsion & hate",

Dave Sylvester's avatar

As one comedian said, I’m not too worried about an actual civil war in a country where half the people don’t even want to go in to work. “Can I zoom into the war?”

Lynnr's avatar

Also, don’t forget the “rent a mob” and the massive amounts of dark money behind them!

Cathryn Kotler's avatar

Don’t discount the other half

Richard's avatar

I think the implosion happens in Europe first. As out of touch with reality as our ruling class is, their's is an order of magnitude worse. I saw a description of the UK as like North Korea but with Islamic rape gangs. Germany wants another go at Russia, Poland wants to take on both of them, France is just paralyzed. Hopefully, this will provide a warning to pull us back from the brink. War is horrible and war at home is the worst.

Brian M's avatar

It will be interesting to watch the Muslims in Germany fight the Muslims in France and the UK. We will find out if there is any national pride left in Europe at all. I kind of doubt it. For that reason, I give a WW3 started in Europe a very low probability

Tom Potts's avatar

Shia versus Sunni, the ancient battle for the last 1,400 years.

Centrist's avatar

Both unite in their hate for all that are not Islamists.

Bonnie Beresford's avatar

There is nascent patriotism in England which is why they squeaked by to exit the EU. I hope they will recover their true place in the world, but things don't look good right now for a revival of love for country that Trump has brought to the US.

Roger Beal's avatar

When the coming caliphate finally traps the last freerange Anglo-Saxon in the USA, his pre-dhimmi belief that Islam posed an existential threat to western societies will be recognized as prescient, not phobic. But it will then be too late for that to matter.

Richard Comer's avatar

Sasha, you’re over the target and releasing precision weapons. Hope that metaphor doesn’t trigger anyone, but it’s a proper description of this article. Right on, Sasha! Your writing has gotten stronger this year. This one might be your best. I’m a happy subscriber.

L.'s avatar

Ken Burns is a pussy.

Robert Lime's avatar

One searches assiduously for such elegant bluntness.

Cat C.'s avatar

And an anti-republic socialist.....just look at his CCP Chinese haircut and stash and beard!!

Jen Todd's avatar

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Deejay's avatar

I think people greatly underestimate how damaging 2008 Obama was. Everyone allowed themselves to be swept away with an Obama Derangement Syndrome, conveniently forgetting or overlooking that he was a snake from South Chicago who had spent years fully involved with some of the most radical “revolutionary” race charlatans in the world, like Louis Farrakhan.

After so many of his soaring speeches that had everyone drunk with hopefulness—to the jaw dropping extent that they gave him a Nobel Peace Prize, for election speeches!!!!!—I remember everyone honestly believed he was going to lead a new era of Yes We Can bipartisanship to improve life and fix so many problems. Immediately after inauguration, the GOP showed up for the bipartisan address-the-problems-of-all-Americans kickoff…and the soaring speech-giver had been replaced by the real Obama. Cold dismissive South Chicago political thug, “elections have consequences” and “I won.”

Also everyone let themselves believe that Obama was uniquely positioned to heal any lingering racial tensions. And that electing a black president was a monumental step forward and confirmation of American democracy’s ability to renew and reinvent. And then came the “Beer Summit” incident. Where a pompous black Harvard professor provoked a tense situation with a local police officer. And then cried racism and injustice…and Obama reflexively jumped in to criticize the white police officer as racist, to “teach America” about ubiquitous systemic racism against black people, to criticize police. And then the real facts of that incident came out. So Obama sheepishly called for the beer summit, where the professor and police officer came together at the White House over a drink to “understand each other.” But it was an unsettling glimpse behind Obama‘s mask, that he was not a guru of racial healing in the slightest, rather every bone in his body was pickled with the divisive grievance mongering of South Chicago radicals.

And so America let itself be entirely duped by his election speeches. And that hopefulness and trust was shattered when he turned out to be the exact opposite. He is the exact opposite of the man in the speeches, which makes him one of the biggest boldest liars in the history of the world. He is exactly who we should have known him to be, a radical South Chicago thug and race baiter, who unleashed and accelerated untold evil divisiveness that has grown into an impossible cancer now 17 years later.

Jim I's avatar

FYI: There is documented evidence (via FBI files) that Valerie Jarrett’s father, maternal grandfather, and father-in-law all had involvement with Communist-aligned groups or individuals.

Vero's avatar

Obama is a psycho/split personality. He couldn’t lead, only destroy. You can see his wife is nuts too. Both are messed up in the head; people who make no sense and stand for nothing.

NWCitizen's avatar

Well, trump stands for "something" - enriching himself. I wonder if he and his "boys" are busy making more deals with the MSB while he's here. Jared got him to invest $2B in his business.

Richard's avatar

Some shrink in NYC gave an interview saying that 75% of his patients have TDS. Peachy Keenan says this would make a great Hallmark Christmas movie.

Tom Potts's avatar

Only if they give them chainsaws and battle axes 🪓

Please tell us again why any sane person wants to live in a larger American city again?

Lynette's avatar

Hallmark wouldn't go there. LOL.

Kolson 67's avatar

The timeline is spot on, our collective delusion about "virtue" and "authenticity" has been hacked by those who have none of it. Obama was the start of this path toward division and the othering of anyone who does not toe the Left's mythological line. Kern & Taibbi brilliantly tied this together, how did the very people who built America and Western Civilization become the people who are to be despised, who are "no good," and "racist, sexist and homophobic."

The Democrats/Neo-Liberals have decided that in oder to rule without challenge, they have to degrade and destroy America and the Americans who built and protected it. Thankfully we are not the UK yet, but it is quite clear that we will be if Democrats and their ilk are allowed to gain any kind of power again.

My grandparents were life long Democrats, grandfather a WWII veteran who was at D-Day, voted that way because they thought they were the Party of the working class. Today, they are the great destroyers of the working class, veterans and any one who presents any challenge to their total rule. We live in very dangerous times. In WWII they could rely on their Country to save them, today, the Left (Labor/Democrats) are the ones systematically seeking to destroy them. I still can't wrap my head around it?!

Raymond E. Allen's avatar

How right your are to compare the Left with the Southern slave owners. Only 7 % of the Southern population owned slaves, yet they controlled all the house and senate seats of the Southern states in congress. They also stated the founder's were wrong all men are not created equal, some men must rule and other men must be ruled, of course by them. If those in the Left rank and file would understand that the elite rule them, just like the slaves, even the slave owners claim they had the perfect socialism, they took care of their slaves, property, from cradle to grave

NWCitizen's avatar

LOL! Trump and his billionaire buddies rule you. The only thing trump is interested in is enriching himself.