103 Comments
User's avatar
Ken D.'s avatar

It kind of struck me this week that the whole J6 thing was really an entrapment. Below somethings I posted on another substack. (I don't know enough about substack to know how to link this, other than copy & paste). But the reality of the situation just struck me like a ton of bricks this week. That really, the J6 intrusion was an engineered event, and based on this engineered event, they really, literally do want to put Trump in jail. Took awhile for that to sink in with me.

The gist of my reasoning is that by this point we can be absolutely certain that Ray Epps was a government agent. And, therefore, we also know for a fact that the day before the Capitol intrusion the government had an agent walking around telling groups of strangers to go into the capitol, (at a time when no one else was talking about doing this. It's theoretically possible, of course, to say that Epps might have flown across the country to do this on his own initiative, but that is so unlikely as to be comparable to saying that Covid escaped from the Wuhan wet market

. Reasonably, we have to assume that Epps' handlers wanted him to do what he did, and therefore they wanted people to go into the capitol the next day, and therefore the whole thing was just a rotten setup.

If you listen to the tapes of Epps on the day before saying "We got to go into the Capitol" it's clear he is stressing "we" and "into". No one else was saying that at the time, and it proved to be the event. And then Epps magically appears at key breach points just before the events.

Damm, no, it was a frickin' setup. And now they want to run the country for it.

Here's what I posted elsewhere on Substack this:

There is ample evidence now to be certain that the January 6 intrusion into the Capitol building was a Government set up. Here is a brief proof.

1. There can be no doubt that Ray Epps was a Government agent. [See https://open.ink/collections/j6 as proof, for example.] Epps was

• filmed at multiple locations the day before promoting the intrusion to groups of strangers.

• He appeared at two of the major breach points just prior to those events.

• He texted his nephew that afternoon that he organized the event.

2. Despite being provably a thousand times more guilty of promoting the event than any other person, Epps was unpunished.

3. Other ample circumstantial evidence corroborates the Government's involvement in :

• The FBI agent who ran the Michigan Governor Whitmer kidnapping hoax was put in charge in DC on J6,

• Despite being authorized to do so, Nancy Pelosi refused to have extra security from the National Guard on hand on that day. (By law, Pelosi was the only person who could do this.)

• In some cases, locked doors were open for the protestors by Capitol Police.

• Grounds around the building which normally were open to the public were temporarily made "no trespassing" areas, and then the "no trespassing" signage was mysteriously removed just before most of the protestors arrived on the scene.

Much more could be said, but the above is sufficient to prove beyond reasonable doubt that J6 was a Government entrapment aimed at catching people who otherwise would have violated no laws.

(and below this I posted)

had Epps been prosecuted proportionally to other J6 protestors, he would have already been in jail for several years. And, he would be facing incarceration for the remainder of his days. Even innocent people are being forced to plead guilty because they can't afford defense and the DC courts and juries are pernicious. Epps would not have been charged at all, except that the pressure on the DOJ to do so eventually became overwhelming.

There is also the circumstance that immediately after the intrusion Epps was put on a governmental "most wanted" list, and then shortly thereafter removed from that list with no explanation.

We only know these things because of great independent reporters such as the great Warren Beattie at Revolver News, and other non-mainstream journalists elsewhere. People who only watch mainstream news are clueless about this stuff.

Expand full comment
BradK (Afuera!)'s avatar

Very well stated, sir, and spot-on. The clear evidence is overwhelming that J6 was a contrived plot to discredit Trump (whom they knew would run for a second term) and to put the fear of God into his supporters. Needless to say it has had the very opposite effect, much like the sham prosecutions.

I'm assuming you've seen this? https://open.ink/collections/j6

Expand full comment
NickO.'s avatar

From my couch, I don't see how there's anything worth prosecuting Trump over. They clearly feel the same way or they wouldn't be chasing such contrived bullshit all over the place. There appears to be plenty of ammo to go after a large swath of the political class that would pass muster in a court that they don't have to hand-pick.

Expand full comment
BradK (Afuera!)'s avatar

None of the sham prosecutions against Trump would ever stand up to appeal. Maintaining a conviction is not the point though, making him unelectable (in a truly fair and transparent election) is the only goal. If and when any convictions are overturned on appeal but after the election, they still have achieved their goal. There would not be an election do-over any more than there was after a substantial chunk of Biden voters discovered that the Laptop From Hell was indeed genuine and regretted their vote.

The lies only need to be maintained until November 5th, after that the consequences are nil.

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

The FBI specializes in unethical "sting" operations. They are famous for pushing the legal boundaries and have lost many cases based on "entrapment" law. If there was a legitimate DOJ today (and it isn't), the Jan6 cases would have been thrown out on this doctrine: https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-645-entrapment-elements

Expand full comment
DoctorBuzzard's avatar

Don't you know, and that's what I see too… Besides I don't believe in coincidence, it's also difficult to believe those half-wits could be clever enough to figure such a remarkable… I'd say something of genius. Which eliminates all of the DNC voters but even James Carville would be hard-pressed. But there it is. Scary.

Expand full comment
Jon's avatar

Thank you for finally paying attention to the Fani Willis story. It has the potential of exploding if it truly does lead back to the DOJ coordinating all of these various lawfare cases brought against Trump.

Expand full comment
NickO.'s avatar

It shows how weak these cases actually are. None of the prosecutors seem to be capable of doing any of this on their own, which means that there is inveitibly a trail back to the DOJ if anyone bothers to look for it. If there were strong cases, they wouldn't have to be run through inept people like Letitia James, Fani Willis, and Alvin Bragg. They are running these cases in front of hand-picked judges that they or their predecessors appointed in precincts where they will have sympathetic jury pools. If these were truly democracy-saving cases, they wouldn't have to hunt for a judiciary harder than a pill popper does a new doctor.

Expand full comment
Jon's avatar

Every case should have a change of venue. These cases are as organic as Jan 6th and Russia-gate.

Expand full comment
BradK (Afuera!)'s avatar

Donald Trump receiving a fair trial in front of a NY or DC jury comprised of 100% hard-core TDS Democrats is about as likely as a black defendant facing a jury of Klansman.

Expand full comment
NickO.'s avatar

That's a very apt analogy.

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

Looks like Fani Willis and her Fulton County and White House co-conspirators are guilty of violating RICO law. How ironic.

Expand full comment
Name Invalid's avatar

We are analyzing the wrong thing. The assumption is that there is some iota of legitimacy about the cases, the evidence, the DAs, The judges... etc. (and in doing so, legitimizes the fraud)

It is like analyzing wrestling moves in a WWE match.

Yes, the Broadway play is poor, but both the actors and the audience know the scripted ending.

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

Each court case is just one arrow in the quiver. As these fail, others will appear. Taking Trump off the ballot will probably fail too. It is curious that they deployed this for the primary rather than waiting for the fall. Probably part of the fantasy about Nikki Haley. Pretty much shows what she is. DNC is trying to convince Democrats to use the open primary to vote for her. The cheat machine is intact. Assassination talk is bubbling out there in the media. War? Riots? Deep State sabotage? I don't know what other "insurance policies" there are but I know they exist.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

Nikki the Neocon is a warmongering neocon. We’re so fucked if she gets elected.

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

Never Nikki.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 14, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

Haley isn't on our side.

Expand full comment
Joe Esposito's avatar

Its great to see the state of Texas standing up to the Fascist federal government led by the fake dementia president.

Have you noticed each time Biden attacks Republicans and Conservatives he can speak in full sentences that are somewhat coherent.

It’s possible there’s a new dementia drug he’s taking or he’s faking his illness.

Hopefully the truth will be revealed right after we get the JFK assassination report from the corrupt CIA.

I say in 100 years?

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

Took Texas Governor at least 2 years too long and several million additional illegal aliens, to act but I am glad he finally did.

Expand full comment
Gym+Fritz's avatar

Vivek Ramaswamy’s 1776 video really rang a bell with me.

What a great team Trump and Ramaswamy could make.

Add Kennedy, and we would have the perfect troika.

Something needs to be done about the “monopoly” of our two political parties.

Expand full comment
NickO.'s avatar

As seems to have been the case from the beginning, all of those that will be the White Knight to take out the horrible Orange Man are worse than anything we’re told he is. Hopefully enough Americans wake up to this before the freedom we know is gone forever. If they can do this to him, they can absolutely do it do any of us.

Expand full comment
Libertarian's avatar

No idea how you have survived so long and so close to Hollywood but I am glad you did and are now a voice for freedom and integrity.

Expand full comment
Sweet Mama's avatar

I. Told. You. So. The vast majority of what they are throwing at Trump has a snowball's chance in hell of sticking, and they know it. It's all been timed and designed as a psyop to make him a martyr, tug at the heartstrings of some very easily fooled people, who will then make him "our" candidate, despite all his failings, betrayals and gaslighting, and then they will hit him with the big guns, the ones he himself provided through his own hubris, dishonesty and incompetence. We have one chance to reverse this with DeSantis, who has a far better record of getting the things done that conservatives say they want. Either way, this country will get what it deserves. We can finally start reversing course on a lot of the carnage, or we can have at least four more years of complete Democrat dominance and lose everything. Decide and own it.

Expand full comment
JMaryH's avatar

Hollywood is beneath contempt, as is the Pfizer Mainstream Media. The effort to muzzle honest candidates running for President, with worthy ideas and issues to be discussed, shows the disdain PMM has for American citizens and the lock on power they perceive themselves worthy of.

Expand full comment
Brian M's avatar

Seems like Fani Willis is another in a long line of Democrat operatives, charading as legitimate justice officials, who believe they are protected by their party and Biden affiliation from the repercussions of their own actions. We can call this the "Hunter Biden Effect", though it has existed for decades (there was also protection for all the Barack Obama gang). But Hunter has made it clear that if you have something on Joe Biden, Merrick Garland and his extended DOJ (extending all the way to the state and local district level) will protect and defend you, regardless of your crime. This can also be called racketeering. So maybe it is Fani Willis who should have the RICO laws applied to her own actions.

Expand full comment
David White's avatar

Three "novel theories" and two "selective prosecutions". That probably adds up to five appeals. What could possibly go wrong?

Expand full comment
Ron's avatar

On Jan 6, 2021, Donald Trump was president of the United States. How is it possible that the sitting president leads an insurrection against the government that he is the head of?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 14, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Justwannabeleftalone's avatar

Not forgotten, just irrelevant. He was the president on jan 6th, 2021. Head of state, head of government. It's not possible for him to lead an insurrection against his own administration.

Nothing else matters.... anout J6

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 15, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Justwannabeleftalone's avatar

Blitz, he WAS the head of government, it was not possible for him to lead an insurrection against himself. And he remained president for 14 days afterwards.

How these simple facts are difficult to understand is beyond comprehension.

Have a fine day!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 15, 2024Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Justwannabeleftalone's avatar

Everyone understands what the few "rioters" goals were, and what the "transition" period is. Perhaps you fail to understand that exclusive and total presidential authority extends until noon, on the 20th of January following an election year.

The good news for me is that once this debate went ad hominem, victory is mine! 🤣

Expand full comment
Allison Gilliland's avatar

Enjoy your Stack so much!

Expand full comment
KAM's avatar

Thank you. Most of this is new to me.

Expand full comment
LudicrousLife's avatar

Really? Where have you been? Welcome to reality! Better late than never. Most of us here have figured out that once you open your eyes and take off the rose colored glasses and see what is going on in our country-you cannot unsee the truth. Then you question every little narrative.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 13, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Pacificus's avatar

Blitz, your use of buzzwords/buzzterms like "conspiracy theory", "cons", cults", "revisionist narratives" and the like, without referencing anything specific is an admission that you got nothing when it comes to actually responding to the points being made here. But your lame argument does, ironically, implicitly validate those points.

Yeah, sounds like someone is watching way too much MSM "news." You have all the key terms down.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 14, 2024Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Pacificus's avatar

You quote AP press reports as if it is a credible source. It isn't. Fail.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 14, 2024Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Heyjude's avatar

So you’ve come back under another new identity, I see.

Expand full comment
LudicrousLife's avatar

Or perhaps you just watch msm

Expand full comment
BeadleBlog's avatar

In regard to the civil case, this can work both ways. It's alleged Trump overvalued his property, but property can be undervalued by banks and appraisers, and this has happened and led to developers having to adjust plans. Could they not then claim being damaged by this undervaluation? Do these morons want us to drown life in the court system?

Expand full comment